Cargando…
Supportive therapies in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and appropriate use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: a Delphi consensus statement
PURPOSE: Data indicate that the use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in routine practice is not consistent with guideline recommendations. The initiative “supportive care for febrile neutropenia prevention and appropria...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07430-7 |
_version_ | 1784842466619293696 |
---|---|
author | Adamo, Vincenzo Antonuzzo, Lorenzo Danova, Marco De Laurentiis, Michelino Marchetti, Paolo Pinto, Carmine Rosti, Giovanni |
author_facet | Adamo, Vincenzo Antonuzzo, Lorenzo Danova, Marco De Laurentiis, Michelino Marchetti, Paolo Pinto, Carmine Rosti, Giovanni |
author_sort | Adamo, Vincenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Data indicate that the use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in routine practice is not consistent with guideline recommendations. The initiative “supportive care for febrile neutropenia prevention and appropriateness of G-CFS use” was undertaken to address the issue of inappropriate prescription of G-CSFs and to improve guideline adherence in the treatment of FN. METHODS: In a two-round Delphi procedure, 36 medical oncologists reviewed clinically relevant recommendations on risk assessment, the appropriate use of G-CSFs, and the prevention of FN based on available literature and individual clinical expertise. RESULTS: The consensus was reached on 16 out of 38 recommendations, which are backed by evidence from randomised clinical trials and routine clinical practice. The medical oncologists agreed that the severity of neutropenia depends on patients’ characteristics and chemotherapy intensity, and therefore, the risk of severe neutropenia or FN should be assessed at each chemotherapy cycle so as to initiate prophylaxis with G-CSFs if required. The use of biosimilar G-CSFs, with similar efficacy and safety profiles to the originator biologic, has improved the availability and sustainability of cancer care. The timing of supportive therapy is crucial; for example, long-acting G-CSF should be administered 24–72 h after chemotherapy administration. Each biological agent has a recommended administration dose and duration, and it is important to follow these recommendations to avoid complications associated with under-prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: It is hoped that these statements will help to increase adherence to guideline recommendations for appropriate G-CSF use and improve patient care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07430-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9715510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97155102022-12-03 Supportive therapies in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and appropriate use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: a Delphi consensus statement Adamo, Vincenzo Antonuzzo, Lorenzo Danova, Marco De Laurentiis, Michelino Marchetti, Paolo Pinto, Carmine Rosti, Giovanni Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Data indicate that the use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in routine practice is not consistent with guideline recommendations. The initiative “supportive care for febrile neutropenia prevention and appropriateness of G-CFS use” was undertaken to address the issue of inappropriate prescription of G-CSFs and to improve guideline adherence in the treatment of FN. METHODS: In a two-round Delphi procedure, 36 medical oncologists reviewed clinically relevant recommendations on risk assessment, the appropriate use of G-CSFs, and the prevention of FN based on available literature and individual clinical expertise. RESULTS: The consensus was reached on 16 out of 38 recommendations, which are backed by evidence from randomised clinical trials and routine clinical practice. The medical oncologists agreed that the severity of neutropenia depends on patients’ characteristics and chemotherapy intensity, and therefore, the risk of severe neutropenia or FN should be assessed at each chemotherapy cycle so as to initiate prophylaxis with G-CSFs if required. The use of biosimilar G-CSFs, with similar efficacy and safety profiles to the originator biologic, has improved the availability and sustainability of cancer care. The timing of supportive therapy is crucial; for example, long-acting G-CSF should be administered 24–72 h after chemotherapy administration. Each biological agent has a recommended administration dose and duration, and it is important to follow these recommendations to avoid complications associated with under-prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: It is hoped that these statements will help to increase adherence to guideline recommendations for appropriate G-CSF use and improve patient care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07430-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9715510/ /pubmed/36334157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07430-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Adamo, Vincenzo Antonuzzo, Lorenzo Danova, Marco De Laurentiis, Michelino Marchetti, Paolo Pinto, Carmine Rosti, Giovanni Supportive therapies in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and appropriate use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: a Delphi consensus statement |
title | Supportive therapies in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and appropriate use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: a Delphi consensus statement |
title_full | Supportive therapies in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and appropriate use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: a Delphi consensus statement |
title_fullStr | Supportive therapies in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and appropriate use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: a Delphi consensus statement |
title_full_unstemmed | Supportive therapies in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and appropriate use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: a Delphi consensus statement |
title_short | Supportive therapies in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and appropriate use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: a Delphi consensus statement |
title_sort | supportive therapies in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and appropriate use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: a delphi consensus statement |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07430-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamovincenzo supportivetherapiesinthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaandappropriateuseofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsadelphiconsensusstatement AT antonuzzolorenzo supportivetherapiesinthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaandappropriateuseofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsadelphiconsensusstatement AT danovamarco supportivetherapiesinthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaandappropriateuseofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsadelphiconsensusstatement AT delaurentiismichelino supportivetherapiesinthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaandappropriateuseofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsadelphiconsensusstatement AT marchettipaolo supportivetherapiesinthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaandappropriateuseofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsadelphiconsensusstatement AT pintocarmine supportivetherapiesinthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaandappropriateuseofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsadelphiconsensusstatement AT rostigiovanni supportivetherapiesinthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaandappropriateuseofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsadelphiconsensusstatement |