Cargando…

The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

To study the feasibility and safety of One-Shot Dilatation (OSD), versus serial sequential dilatation in tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). One Hundred and Fifty patients were randomised into two groups; Group A (One-Shot Dilatation), Group B (Serial Dilatation). Twenty-one patients were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghoneima, Waleed, Makki, Mohamed, Lotfi, Mohamed Amr, Mostafa, Amr, Elkady, Amr, Rammah, Ahmed M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01383-6
_version_ 1784842468101980160
author Ghoneima, Waleed
Makki, Mohamed
Lotfi, Mohamed Amr
Mostafa, Amr
Elkady, Amr
Rammah, Ahmed M.
author_facet Ghoneima, Waleed
Makki, Mohamed
Lotfi, Mohamed Amr
Mostafa, Amr
Elkady, Amr
Rammah, Ahmed M.
author_sort Ghoneima, Waleed
collection PubMed
description To study the feasibility and safety of One-Shot Dilatation (OSD), versus serial sequential dilatation in tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). One Hundred and Fifty patients were randomised into two groups; Group A (One-Shot Dilatation), Group B (Serial Dilatation). Twenty-one patients were excluded from the study. Detailed history was taken and full physical examination was performed. Pre-operative routine laboratory investigations were done. Also, non-contrast Computed Tomography of the Urinary Tract (CTUT) and plain urinary tract x-ray were done. Intra-operative assessments of dilatation, total operative, total fluoroscopy and fluoroscopy during dilatation durations were recorded, as well as estimated blood loss. Post-operatively haemoglobin, creatinine levels and CTUT were performed for all patients. Complications, as urinary leakage time, analgesic requirements and hospitalization time were measured. There were statistically significant differences in the intraoperative durations, where Group A had shorter dilatation time, fluoroscopy time during dilatation and total operative time. Group B had a higher complications rate than Group A; 37.9%, 11.3%, respectively. Also, Group B showed haemoglobin drop by 0.44 mg/dl higher than Group A. More doses of analgesia were required for Group B. Hospitalization time and rate of urinary leakage were both in favour of Group A. For patients undergoing Tubeless PCNL, we have concluded that one-shot dilatation seems to be a safer and more feasible technique than Serial dilatation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9715517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97155172022-12-03 The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study Ghoneima, Waleed Makki, Mohamed Lotfi, Mohamed Amr Mostafa, Amr Elkady, Amr Rammah, Ahmed M. Urolithiasis Research To study the feasibility and safety of One-Shot Dilatation (OSD), versus serial sequential dilatation in tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). One Hundred and Fifty patients were randomised into two groups; Group A (One-Shot Dilatation), Group B (Serial Dilatation). Twenty-one patients were excluded from the study. Detailed history was taken and full physical examination was performed. Pre-operative routine laboratory investigations were done. Also, non-contrast Computed Tomography of the Urinary Tract (CTUT) and plain urinary tract x-ray were done. Intra-operative assessments of dilatation, total operative, total fluoroscopy and fluoroscopy during dilatation durations were recorded, as well as estimated blood loss. Post-operatively haemoglobin, creatinine levels and CTUT were performed for all patients. Complications, as urinary leakage time, analgesic requirements and hospitalization time were measured. There were statistically significant differences in the intraoperative durations, where Group A had shorter dilatation time, fluoroscopy time during dilatation and total operative time. Group B had a higher complications rate than Group A; 37.9%, 11.3%, respectively. Also, Group B showed haemoglobin drop by 0.44 mg/dl higher than Group A. More doses of analgesia were required for Group B. Hospitalization time and rate of urinary leakage were both in favour of Group A. For patients undergoing Tubeless PCNL, we have concluded that one-shot dilatation seems to be a safer and more feasible technique than Serial dilatation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9715517/ /pubmed/36454345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01383-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Ghoneima, Waleed
Makki, Mohamed
Lotfi, Mohamed Amr
Mostafa, Amr
Elkady, Amr
Rammah, Ahmed M.
The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_full The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_fullStr The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_short The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_sort feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01383-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ghoneimawaleed thefeasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT makkimohamed thefeasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lotfimohamedamr thefeasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT mostafaamr thefeasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT elkadyamr thefeasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT rammahahmedm thefeasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ghoneimawaleed feasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT makkimohamed feasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lotfimohamedamr feasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT mostafaamr feasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT elkadyamr feasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT rammahahmedm feasibilityandsafetyofoneshotdilatationcomparedtoconventionalsequentialdilatationintubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy