Cargando…

Cognitive flexibility in younger and older children who stutter

PURPOSE: Recent research findings suggest possible weaknesses in cognitive flexibility (CF) in children who stutter (CWS) when compared to children who do not stutter (CWNS). Studies so far, have been conducted with either younger (3–6 years old) or older children (6–12 years old) with a variety of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paphiti, Maria, Eggers, Kurt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017319
_version_ 1784842578572607488
author Paphiti, Maria
Eggers, Kurt
author_facet Paphiti, Maria
Eggers, Kurt
author_sort Paphiti, Maria
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Recent research findings suggest possible weaknesses in cognitive flexibility (CF) in children who stutter (CWS) when compared to children who do not stutter (CWNS). Studies so far, have been conducted with either younger (3–6 years old) or older children (6–12 years old) with a variety of measures. The purpose of the present study was to investigate CF with the use of a single behavioral measure across a broader age range (4–10 years old). METHODS: Participants were 37 CWS (mean age = 6.90 years) and 37 age-and gender-matched CWNS (mean age = 6.88 years), divided in a younger (below 7 years) and older (above 7 years) age group. All participants undertook a computerized visual set-shifting task consisting of three blocks. CF was evaluated through across-and within-block comparisons of the actual response speed and accuracy values. In addition, mixing-and set-shifting-costs were evaluated based on the mean response speed and accuracy. RESULTS: All participants showed expected mixing-and set-shifting-costs. Only the within-block analyses yielded significant between (sub)group differences. Investigation of the block × classification group × age group interactions showed that older CWS had larger set-shifting-costs (slowed down more and made more errors) compared to older CWNS. CONCLUSION: While all participants required more time during set-shifting trials, only the older CWS (7–10 years old), and not younger CWS, were slower and made more errors. This finding corroborates previous findings in CWS of a similar age and could possibly point to a role of CF in stuttering persistence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9715977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97159772022-12-03 Cognitive flexibility in younger and older children who stutter Paphiti, Maria Eggers, Kurt Front Psychol Psychology PURPOSE: Recent research findings suggest possible weaknesses in cognitive flexibility (CF) in children who stutter (CWS) when compared to children who do not stutter (CWNS). Studies so far, have been conducted with either younger (3–6 years old) or older children (6–12 years old) with a variety of measures. The purpose of the present study was to investigate CF with the use of a single behavioral measure across a broader age range (4–10 years old). METHODS: Participants were 37 CWS (mean age = 6.90 years) and 37 age-and gender-matched CWNS (mean age = 6.88 years), divided in a younger (below 7 years) and older (above 7 years) age group. All participants undertook a computerized visual set-shifting task consisting of three blocks. CF was evaluated through across-and within-block comparisons of the actual response speed and accuracy values. In addition, mixing-and set-shifting-costs were evaluated based on the mean response speed and accuracy. RESULTS: All participants showed expected mixing-and set-shifting-costs. Only the within-block analyses yielded significant between (sub)group differences. Investigation of the block × classification group × age group interactions showed that older CWS had larger set-shifting-costs (slowed down more and made more errors) compared to older CWNS. CONCLUSION: While all participants required more time during set-shifting trials, only the older CWS (7–10 years old), and not younger CWS, were slower and made more errors. This finding corroborates previous findings in CWS of a similar age and could possibly point to a role of CF in stuttering persistence. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9715977/ /pubmed/36467213 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017319 Text en Copyright © 2022 Paphiti and Eggers. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Paphiti, Maria
Eggers, Kurt
Cognitive flexibility in younger and older children who stutter
title Cognitive flexibility in younger and older children who stutter
title_full Cognitive flexibility in younger and older children who stutter
title_fullStr Cognitive flexibility in younger and older children who stutter
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive flexibility in younger and older children who stutter
title_short Cognitive flexibility in younger and older children who stutter
title_sort cognitive flexibility in younger and older children who stutter
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017319
work_keys_str_mv AT paphitimaria cognitiveflexibilityinyoungerandolderchildrenwhostutter
AT eggerskurt cognitiveflexibilityinyoungerandolderchildrenwhostutter