Cargando…
Exploring patient experience of mandatory mask wearing during MRI scans
INTRODUCTION: Anxiety in patients undergoing Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations has been well documented along with causes and strategies to support patent through this. During the Covid-19 pandemic, mask wearing in clinical settings became compulsory for both staff and patients. Whilst s...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35618399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2022.10.012 |
_version_ | 1784842584468750336 |
---|---|
author | Partner, A Costigan, C |
author_facet | Partner, A Costigan, C |
author_sort | Partner, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Anxiety in patients undergoing Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations has been well documented along with causes and strategies to support patent through this. During the Covid-19 pandemic, mask wearing in clinical settings became compulsory for both staff and patients. Whilst staff may be more familiar with wearing personal protective equipment it is unknown how this could affect patient experiences. We know that patients can get claustrophobic in MR scans which affects their wellbeing, scan attendance and even scan quality. This study aims to understand if wearing a mask had any effect of their willingness to comply with the scan, and if they were adequately prepared, and how it affects their feelings about attending for future scan appointments. METHODS: A purposive sampling technique was chosen with participants being invited nationally across the UK. Inclusion criteria required that participants be aged 18 years or older, their scan had taken place in a UK organisation either NHS or private between March 2020 and December 2021 and that they had worn a face mask during their scan. Ethical approval was gained from University of Derby Research and Ethics Committee. Informed consent and participation information sheets were completed. No identifying data was collected and therefore responses were anonymous. A mixed methods online survey design was utilised, and this was shared on social media using professional accounts and charities. RESULTS: Inductive thematic analysis was used with both researchers independently blind coded the qualitative data. The main themes emerged which were anxiety and discomfort, information and preparation and positivity around the experience. The quantitative data analysis in on-going and will be presented in the final presentation. CONCLUSION: We should review patient experiences taking a holistic approach to the entire examination including preparatory material as well as activity in the waiting area and scan room. We need to consider the impact of mask wearing on anxiety and discomfort and revisit what patient preparation looks like to ensure patients have a better experience. This needs to take place in the education of student radiographers as well as qualified professionals in clinical departments. People want to feel prepared and be treated as individuals. We must embrace the principles of person-centred care at every level of what we do. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9716001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97160012022-12-02 Exploring patient experience of mandatory mask wearing during MRI scans Partner, A Costigan, C J Med Imaging Radiat Sci Article INTRODUCTION: Anxiety in patients undergoing Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations has been well documented along with causes and strategies to support patent through this. During the Covid-19 pandemic, mask wearing in clinical settings became compulsory for both staff and patients. Whilst staff may be more familiar with wearing personal protective equipment it is unknown how this could affect patient experiences. We know that patients can get claustrophobic in MR scans which affects their wellbeing, scan attendance and even scan quality. This study aims to understand if wearing a mask had any effect of their willingness to comply with the scan, and if they were adequately prepared, and how it affects their feelings about attending for future scan appointments. METHODS: A purposive sampling technique was chosen with participants being invited nationally across the UK. Inclusion criteria required that participants be aged 18 years or older, their scan had taken place in a UK organisation either NHS or private between March 2020 and December 2021 and that they had worn a face mask during their scan. Ethical approval was gained from University of Derby Research and Ethics Committee. Informed consent and participation information sheets were completed. No identifying data was collected and therefore responses were anonymous. A mixed methods online survey design was utilised, and this was shared on social media using professional accounts and charities. RESULTS: Inductive thematic analysis was used with both researchers independently blind coded the qualitative data. The main themes emerged which were anxiety and discomfort, information and preparation and positivity around the experience. The quantitative data analysis in on-going and will be presented in the final presentation. CONCLUSION: We should review patient experiences taking a holistic approach to the entire examination including preparatory material as well as activity in the waiting area and scan room. We need to consider the impact of mask wearing on anxiety and discomfort and revisit what patient preparation looks like to ensure patients have a better experience. This needs to take place in the education of student radiographers as well as qualified professionals in clinical departments. People want to feel prepared and be treated as individuals. We must embrace the principles of person-centred care at every level of what we do. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-12 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9716001/ /pubmed/35618399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2022.10.012 Text en Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Partner, A Costigan, C Exploring patient experience of mandatory mask wearing during MRI scans |
title | Exploring patient experience of mandatory mask wearing during MRI scans |
title_full | Exploring patient experience of mandatory mask wearing during MRI scans |
title_fullStr | Exploring patient experience of mandatory mask wearing during MRI scans |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring patient experience of mandatory mask wearing during MRI scans |
title_short | Exploring patient experience of mandatory mask wearing during MRI scans |
title_sort | exploring patient experience of mandatory mask wearing during mri scans |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35618399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2022.10.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT partnera exploringpatientexperienceofmandatorymaskwearingduringmriscans AT costiganc exploringpatientexperienceofmandatorymaskwearingduringmriscans |