A Review of Mentorship in Urology: Are We Satisfied?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the state of mentorship in the field of urology. RECENT FINDINGS: Mentorship has been shown to decrease burnout, increase recruitment of underrepresented minority groups, and have a positive influence on the career trajectory of mentees. Approximately half of surgical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Annie, Harnett, Joseph, Kothari, Pankti, Ernst, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Education (G Badalato and E Margolin, Section Editors)
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36459377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01122-9
_version_ 1784842621270622208
author Chen, Annie
Harnett, Joseph
Kothari, Pankti
Ernst, Michael
author_facet Chen, Annie
Harnett, Joseph
Kothari, Pankti
Ernst, Michael
author_sort Chen, Annie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the state of mentorship in the field of urology. RECENT FINDINGS: Mentorship has been shown to decrease burnout, increase recruitment of underrepresented minority groups, and have a positive influence on the career trajectory of mentees. Approximately half of surgical residency programs have mentorship programs. The current literature supports the idea that formal mentorship programs are successful based on level 1 satisfaction scores. However, studies are sparse and of low quality. Mentorship program success is rarely objectively measured. SUMMARY: Structured mentorship programs appear to be beneficial, but require serious planning, evaluation, and ongoing support without which the programs can fail. Future research should be focused on objective and measurable metrics of success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9716155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97161552022-12-02 A Review of Mentorship in Urology: Are We Satisfied? Chen, Annie Harnett, Joseph Kothari, Pankti Ernst, Michael Curr Urol Rep Education (G Badalato and E Margolin, Section Editors) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the state of mentorship in the field of urology. RECENT FINDINGS: Mentorship has been shown to decrease burnout, increase recruitment of underrepresented minority groups, and have a positive influence on the career trajectory of mentees. Approximately half of surgical residency programs have mentorship programs. The current literature supports the idea that formal mentorship programs are successful based on level 1 satisfaction scores. However, studies are sparse and of low quality. Mentorship program success is rarely objectively measured. SUMMARY: Structured mentorship programs appear to be beneficial, but require serious planning, evaluation, and ongoing support without which the programs can fail. Future research should be focused on objective and measurable metrics of success. Springer US 2022-12-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9716155/ /pubmed/36459377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01122-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Education (G Badalato and E Margolin, Section Editors)
Chen, Annie
Harnett, Joseph
Kothari, Pankti
Ernst, Michael
A Review of Mentorship in Urology: Are We Satisfied?
title A Review of Mentorship in Urology: Are We Satisfied?
title_full A Review of Mentorship in Urology: Are We Satisfied?
title_fullStr A Review of Mentorship in Urology: Are We Satisfied?
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Mentorship in Urology: Are We Satisfied?
title_short A Review of Mentorship in Urology: Are We Satisfied?
title_sort review of mentorship in urology: are we satisfied?
topic Education (G Badalato and E Margolin, Section Editors)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36459377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01122-9
work_keys_str_mv AT chenannie areviewofmentorshipinurologyarewesatisfied
AT harnettjoseph areviewofmentorshipinurologyarewesatisfied
AT kotharipankti areviewofmentorshipinurologyarewesatisfied
AT ernstmichael areviewofmentorshipinurologyarewesatisfied
AT chenannie reviewofmentorshipinurologyarewesatisfied
AT harnettjoseph reviewofmentorshipinurologyarewesatisfied
AT kotharipankti reviewofmentorshipinurologyarewesatisfied
AT ernstmichael reviewofmentorshipinurologyarewesatisfied

Ejemplares similares