Cargando…

Spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant African women: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Spirometry is a commonly used lung function test. It assesses respiratory functions by measuring the air volume and the rate at which a person can exhale from lungs filled to their total capacity. The most helpful spirometry parameters are: forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruhighira, Jacktan Josephat, Mashili, Fredirick L., Tungu, Alexander Mtemi, Mamuya, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02081-6
_version_ 1784842624122748928
author Ruhighira, Jacktan Josephat
Mashili, Fredirick L.
Tungu, Alexander Mtemi
Mamuya, Simon
author_facet Ruhighira, Jacktan Josephat
Mashili, Fredirick L.
Tungu, Alexander Mtemi
Mamuya, Simon
author_sort Ruhighira, Jacktan Josephat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spirometry is a commonly used lung function test. It assesses respiratory functions by measuring the air volume and the rate at which a person can exhale from lungs filled to their total capacity. The most helpful spirometry parameters are: forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow (PEF). Pregnancy derives an altered physiological state due to hormonal and anatomical changes that affect the respiratory system. Despite that, spirometry is less commonly done during pregnancy, and if done, test results are evaluated against non-pregnancy references. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore spirometry profiles in pregnant and non-pregnant women and describe their differences. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study involved age-matched pregnant and non-pregnant participants recruited from Mnazi Moja ANC and Muhimbili University (MUHAS). A digital spirometer was used to assess respiratory function. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 23. The mean spirometry values of pregnant participants were compared to those of non-pregnant participants using an independent sample t-test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study included 92 pregnant and 98 non-pregnant participants subjected to spirometry. Both FVC and FEV1 values were significantly lower in pregnant than in non-pregnant participants (2.7 ± 0.5 L vs. 2.9 ± 0.5 L; p < 0.01 and 2.2 ± 0.4 L vs. 2.5 ± 0.4 L; p < 0.01 respectively). In addition, pregnant participants had significantly lower mean PEF values than their non-pregnant counterparts (303 ± 84 L/min versus 353 ± 64 L/min; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Spirometry test values are lower in pregnancy than in non-pregnant participants. RECOMMENDATIONS: Interpreting the spirometry test values of pregnant women using references obtained from non-pregnant women may be inappropriate. Future studies should evaluate the appropriateness of predicting spirometry values of pregnant women using reference equations derived from non-pregnant women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9716166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97161662022-12-02 Spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant African women: a cross-sectional study Ruhighira, Jacktan Josephat Mashili, Fredirick L. Tungu, Alexander Mtemi Mamuya, Simon BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: Spirometry is a commonly used lung function test. It assesses respiratory functions by measuring the air volume and the rate at which a person can exhale from lungs filled to their total capacity. The most helpful spirometry parameters are: forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow (PEF). Pregnancy derives an altered physiological state due to hormonal and anatomical changes that affect the respiratory system. Despite that, spirometry is less commonly done during pregnancy, and if done, test results are evaluated against non-pregnancy references. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore spirometry profiles in pregnant and non-pregnant women and describe their differences. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study involved age-matched pregnant and non-pregnant participants recruited from Mnazi Moja ANC and Muhimbili University (MUHAS). A digital spirometer was used to assess respiratory function. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 23. The mean spirometry values of pregnant participants were compared to those of non-pregnant participants using an independent sample t-test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study included 92 pregnant and 98 non-pregnant participants subjected to spirometry. Both FVC and FEV1 values were significantly lower in pregnant than in non-pregnant participants (2.7 ± 0.5 L vs. 2.9 ± 0.5 L; p < 0.01 and 2.2 ± 0.4 L vs. 2.5 ± 0.4 L; p < 0.01 respectively). In addition, pregnant participants had significantly lower mean PEF values than their non-pregnant counterparts (303 ± 84 L/min versus 353 ± 64 L/min; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Spirometry test values are lower in pregnancy than in non-pregnant participants. RECOMMENDATIONS: Interpreting the spirometry test values of pregnant women using references obtained from non-pregnant women may be inappropriate. Future studies should evaluate the appropriateness of predicting spirometry values of pregnant women using reference equations derived from non-pregnant women. BioMed Central 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9716166/ /pubmed/36461083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02081-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ruhighira, Jacktan Josephat
Mashili, Fredirick L.
Tungu, Alexander Mtemi
Mamuya, Simon
Spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant African women: a cross-sectional study
title Spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant African women: a cross-sectional study
title_full Spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant African women: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant African women: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant African women: a cross-sectional study
title_short Spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant African women: a cross-sectional study
title_sort spirometry profiles among pregnant and non-pregnant african women: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02081-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ruhighirajacktanjosephat spirometryprofilesamongpregnantandnonpregnantafricanwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT mashilifredirickl spirometryprofilesamongpregnantandnonpregnantafricanwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT tungualexandermtemi spirometryprofilesamongpregnantandnonpregnantafricanwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT mamuyasimon spirometryprofilesamongpregnantandnonpregnantafricanwomenacrosssectionalstudy