Cargando…

Defending the use of the mutual manipulability criterion in the extended cognition debate

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gillett, Alexander James, Whyte, Christopher Jack, Hewitson, Christopher Louis, Kaplan, David Michael
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:	Psychology
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1043747

Ejemplares similares

Experimentally Manipulating Items Informs on the (Limited) Construct and Criterion Validity of the Humor Styles Questionnaire
por: Ruch, Willibald, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Simulations in Cyber-Security: A Review of Cognitive Modeling of Network Attackers, Defenders, and Users
por: Veksler, Vladislav D., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Susceptible user search for defending opinion manipulation
por: Tang, Wenyi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Asymmetric participation of defenders and critics of vaccines to debates on French-speaking Twitter
por: Gargiulo, Floriana, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Editorial: Language, Cognition, and the Manipulated Brain: Theoretical and Experimental Perspectives on Manipulative Processes in Language Comprehension
por: Masia, Viviana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

On the hodological criterion for homology
por: Faunes, Macarena, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Defending Oneself From Tourists: The Counter-Environmental Bubble
por: Cortini, Michela, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Affective Primacy vs. Cognitive Primacy: Dissolving the Debate
por: Lai, Vicky Tzuyin, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Our health insurance fund: a mutual benefit system worth defending!
por: Association du personnel
Publicado: (2007)

Defending culture : conceptual foundation and Contemporary Debate
por: Fornäs Johan
Publicado: (2017)

A neural basis of rational inattention models: consistency of cognitive cost with the mutual information criterion
por: Wu, Qi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Neutrophils defending the defenders
por: Singh, Roli, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Defenders of the truth : the battle for science in the sociobiology debate and beyond /
por: Segerstråle, Ullica Christina Olofsdotter

Ionic Hopping Defended
por: Miller, Christopher
Publicado: (1999)

Criterion Validity of Cognitive Reflection for Predicting Job Performance and Training Proficiency: A Meta-Analysis
por: Otero, Inmaculada, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A mutual information criterion with applications to canonical correlation analysis and graphical models
por: DelSole, Timothy, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

To Defend or Not To Defend: That’s the Question
por: Varahan, Sriram, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Dubious decision evidence and criterion flexibility in recognition memory
por: Kantner, Justin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Does Ability to Defend Moderate the Association between Exposure to Bullying and Symptoms of Anxiety?
por: Nielsen, Morten Birkeland, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Inferring Association Between Alcohol Addiction and Defendant's Emotion Based on Sound at Court
por: Song, Yun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Criterion and incremental validity of the emotion regulation questionnaire
por: Ioannidis, Christos A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Zen and the brain: mutually illuminating topics
por: Austin, James H.
Publicado: (2013)

Effects of Male Defendants’ Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles
por: Yang, Qun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Inferring influence of people's emotions at court on defendant's emotions using a prediction model
por: Song, Yun, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

How Different is Different? Criterion and Sensitivity in Face-Space
por: Hill, Harold, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Security under Uncertainty: Adaptive Attackers Are More Challenging to Human Defenders than Random Attackers
por: Moisan, Frédéric, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cyber Security: Effects of Penalizing Defenders in Cyber-Security Games via Experimentation and Computational Modeling
por: Maqbool, Zahid, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Adolescent Empathy Influences Bystander Defending in School Bullying: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis
por: Deng, Xiaoping, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Neutrophil: Constant Defender and First Responder
por: Fine, Noah, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Human–Autonomy Teaming: Definitions, Debates, and Directions
por: Lyons, Joseph B., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Joint Distribution Criterion and the Distance Tests for Selective Probabilistic Causality
por: Dzhafarov, Ehtibar N., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Criterion and Divergent Validity of the Sexual Minority Adolescent Stress Inventory
por: Goldbach, Jeremy T., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Mirror Self-Recognition in Pigeons: Beyond the Pass-or-Fail Criterion
por: Wittek, Neslihan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Direct Bullying and Cyberbullying: Experimental Study of Bystanders’ Motivation to Defend Victims and the Role of Anxiety and Identification With the Bully
por: Jungert, Tomas, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Socially Extended Cognition and Shared Intentionality
por: Lyre, Holger
Publicado: (2018)

Thinking Animals: A Closed Case or an Open Debate?
por: Parrish, Audrey E., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Unconscious Imagination and the Mental Imagery Debate
por: Brogaard, Berit, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The Importance of Perceived Procedural Justice Among Defendants With a Non-Western Background Involved in Dutch Criminal Cases
por: Ansems, Lisa F. M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Concurrent Criterion Validity of the 32-Item Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure
por: Medhizadah, Shabnam, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The Strengths Use Scale: Psychometric Properties, Longitudinal Invariance and Criterion Validity
por: van Zyl, Llewellyn E., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_irmqksgqrsrcltblc8h1ri55j2