Association of mean platelet volume/lymphocyte ratio with inflammation in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1–4: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: The mean platelet volume/ratio (MPVLR) is recognized as a novel marker of inflammation. We evaluated whether the MPVLR is associated with inflammation in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1–4. METHODS: A total of 402 non-dialysis patients with CKD stages 1–4 were included. The indicators of hematological, renal function (urea, serum creatinine [Scr], estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], and urine albumin to creatinine ratio [ACR]) and the markers of inflammation (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP] and fibrinogen [FIB]) were recorded. The MPVLR values at different CKD stages were analyzed. Next, based on the absence (hsCRP level < 5 mg/L) and presence (hsCRP level > 5 mg/L) of inflammation, the patients were categorized, and the differences in indices between the two groups were observed. The patients were divided into two groups based on the median MPVLR value (6.39) at admission. The laboratory indices of patients with CKD were compared. Simultaneously, a correlation analysis was performed to identify the association between the MPVLR and each parameter. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to test whether the MPVLR was associated independently with the presence of inflammation in non-dialysis patients with CKD. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyzed diagnostic performance of the MPVLR in evaluating the inflammation of non-dialysis patients with CKD stages 1-4. RESULTS: The MPVLR was higher in patients with CKD stages 3–4 than in those with CKD stages 1 and 2. Significant differences in urea, Scr, eGFR, ACR, lymphocyte (LYM), red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), RBC distribution width (RDW-CV), MPVLR, and FIB values were observed between the groups with and without inflammation. The patients with a higher MPVLR had higher urea, Scr, ACR, WBC, neutrophils (NEU), RDW-CV, platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), and hsCRP values and lower eGFR, LYM, RBC, HGB, and platelet (PLT) values. The MPVLR showed a positive correlation with age, urea, Scr, WBC, NEU, RDW-CV, PDW, MPV, and hsCRP values and a negative correlation with the eGFR, LYM, RBC, HGB, and PLT values. A logistic analysis revealed that the MPVLR was associated independently with the presence of inflammation in non-dialysis patients with CKD, after adjustment for the confounding factors (odds ratio = 1.020; P = 0.024). Furthermore, MPVLR exhibited a modest diagnostic performance for the assessment of inflammation in non-dialysis patients with CKD stages 1-4, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.706, and the sensitivity, specificity being 46.2% and 83.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MPVLR was associated independently with the presence of inflammation in non-dialysis patients with CKD and may be useful for monitoring inflammation.