Cargando…

Risk assessment of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola for the EU

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a risk assessment of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola (Xcv). This pest causes bacterial canker of grapevine and is reported from Brazil and India. Two scenarios were considered: scenario A0 (current practice) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bragard, Claude, Baptista, Paola, Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet, Di Serio, Francesco, Gonthier, Paolo, Jaques Miret, Josep Anton, Justesen, Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod, Alan, Magnusson, Christer Sven, Milonas, Panagiotis, Navas‐Cortes, Juan A, Parnell, Stephen, Potting, Roel, Reignault, Philippe Lucien, Stefani, Emilio, Thulke, Hans‐Hermann, van der Werf, Wopke, Yuen, Jonathan, Zappalà, Lucia, Cubero, Jaime, Gilioli, Gianni, Makowski, David, Mastin, Alexander, Maiorano, Andrea, Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf, Pautasso, Marco, Tramontini, Sara, Vicent Civera, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474480
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7641
_version_ 1784842665174499328
author Bragard, Claude
Baptista, Paola
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Di Serio, Francesco
Gonthier, Paolo
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe Lucien
Stefani, Emilio
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
van der Werf, Wopke
Yuen, Jonathan
Zappalà, Lucia
Cubero, Jaime
Gilioli, Gianni
Makowski, David
Mastin, Alexander
Maiorano, Andrea
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Pautasso, Marco
Tramontini, Sara
Vicent Civera, Antonio
author_facet Bragard, Claude
Baptista, Paola
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Di Serio, Francesco
Gonthier, Paolo
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe Lucien
Stefani, Emilio
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
van der Werf, Wopke
Yuen, Jonathan
Zappalà, Lucia
Cubero, Jaime
Gilioli, Gianni
Makowski, David
Mastin, Alexander
Maiorano, Andrea
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Pautasso, Marco
Tramontini, Sara
Vicent Civera, Antonio
collection PubMed
description Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a risk assessment of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola (Xcv). This pest causes bacterial canker of grapevine and is reported from Brazil and India. Two scenarios were considered: scenario A0 (current practice) and A2 (additional control measures). For the fresh grape import pathway, scenario A0 results in an order of magnitude of about one entry per 10 years (median; 90% uncertainty interval between ca. one entry per 18,000 years and ca. five entries per year). For the Vitis spp. plants for planting for research/breeding purposes import pathway, the risk of entry is several orders of magnitude smaller than the risk due to fresh grape import. This outcome is also obtained under scenario A2. The key entry uncertainties include import volume and transfer (for plants for planting), transfer and the disaggregation factor (for fresh grapes) and the limited availability of epidemiological data. The extent of the area favourable for Xcv establishment in the EU is uncertain, illustrating the limitations of climate suitability assessments when based on few data points and little epidemiological information. Nevertheless, the risk of Xcv establishment is only slightly lower than the risk of Xcv entry, i.e. no major establishment constraints are expected for most entries. Similarly, the risk of Xcv establishment is assessed as only slightly lower under current climate compared to the climate of 2041–2060. For grapevine growing areas in the EU with average yearly temperature above 17°C, the lag phase between establishment and spread is expected to be about 3 years (median; 90% range between ca. 6 months and ca. 6 years). Under the same scenario, the rate of spread by natural means is assessed to be ca. 300 m/year (median; 90% range between ca. 35 and ca. 800 m/year). The spread rate would be considerably higher considering movements of plants and cutting tools or machinery. The percentage of grapevine plants infected by Xcv in production sites as yearly average over a 30‐year production cycle is estimated to be ca. 17% (median; 90% range between ca. 1.5% and ca. 46%) in table grapes and ca. 12% (median; 90% range between ca. 0.7% and ca. 37%) in wine grapes. Impacts have been reported to be severe in Brazil and India, but the estimates provided here show that there is considerable uncertainty about expected impacts in the EU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9716333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97163332022-12-05 Risk assessment of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola for the EU Bragard, Claude Baptista, Paola Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Di Serio, Francesco Gonthier, Paolo Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Justesen, Annemarie Fejer MacLeod, Alan Magnusson, Christer Sven Milonas, Panagiotis Navas‐Cortes, Juan A Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Reignault, Philippe Lucien Stefani, Emilio Thulke, Hans‐Hermann van der Werf, Wopke Yuen, Jonathan Zappalà, Lucia Cubero, Jaime Gilioli, Gianni Makowski, David Mastin, Alexander Maiorano, Andrea Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Pautasso, Marco Tramontini, Sara Vicent Civera, Antonio EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a risk assessment of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola (Xcv). This pest causes bacterial canker of grapevine and is reported from Brazil and India. Two scenarios were considered: scenario A0 (current practice) and A2 (additional control measures). For the fresh grape import pathway, scenario A0 results in an order of magnitude of about one entry per 10 years (median; 90% uncertainty interval between ca. one entry per 18,000 years and ca. five entries per year). For the Vitis spp. plants for planting for research/breeding purposes import pathway, the risk of entry is several orders of magnitude smaller than the risk due to fresh grape import. This outcome is also obtained under scenario A2. The key entry uncertainties include import volume and transfer (for plants for planting), transfer and the disaggregation factor (for fresh grapes) and the limited availability of epidemiological data. The extent of the area favourable for Xcv establishment in the EU is uncertain, illustrating the limitations of climate suitability assessments when based on few data points and little epidemiological information. Nevertheless, the risk of Xcv establishment is only slightly lower than the risk of Xcv entry, i.e. no major establishment constraints are expected for most entries. Similarly, the risk of Xcv establishment is assessed as only slightly lower under current climate compared to the climate of 2041–2060. For grapevine growing areas in the EU with average yearly temperature above 17°C, the lag phase between establishment and spread is expected to be about 3 years (median; 90% range between ca. 6 months and ca. 6 years). Under the same scenario, the rate of spread by natural means is assessed to be ca. 300 m/year (median; 90% range between ca. 35 and ca. 800 m/year). The spread rate would be considerably higher considering movements of plants and cutting tools or machinery. The percentage of grapevine plants infected by Xcv in production sites as yearly average over a 30‐year production cycle is estimated to be ca. 17% (median; 90% range between ca. 1.5% and ca. 46%) in table grapes and ca. 12% (median; 90% range between ca. 0.7% and ca. 37%) in wine grapes. Impacts have been reported to be severe in Brazil and India, but the estimates provided here show that there is considerable uncertainty about expected impacts in the EU. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9716333/ /pubmed/36474480 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7641 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Bragard, Claude
Baptista, Paola
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Di Serio, Francesco
Gonthier, Paolo
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe Lucien
Stefani, Emilio
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
van der Werf, Wopke
Yuen, Jonathan
Zappalà, Lucia
Cubero, Jaime
Gilioli, Gianni
Makowski, David
Mastin, Alexander
Maiorano, Andrea
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Pautasso, Marco
Tramontini, Sara
Vicent Civera, Antonio
Risk assessment of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola for the EU
title Risk assessment of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola for the EU
title_full Risk assessment of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola for the EU
title_fullStr Risk assessment of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola for the EU
title_full_unstemmed Risk assessment of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola for the EU
title_short Risk assessment of Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola for the EU
title_sort risk assessment of xanthomonas citri pv. viticola for the eu
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474480
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7641
work_keys_str_mv AT riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT bragardclaude riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT baptistapaola riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT chatzivassiliouelisavet riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT diseriofrancesco riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT gonthierpaolo riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT jaquesmiretjosepanton riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT justesenannemariefejer riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT macleodalan riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT magnussonchristersven riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT milonaspanagiotis riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT navascortesjuana riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT parnellstephen riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT pottingroel riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT reignaultphilippelucien riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT stefaniemilio riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT thulkehanshermann riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT vanderwerfwopke riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT yuenjonathan riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT zappalalucia riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT cuberojaime riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT gilioligianni riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT makowskidavid riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT mastinalexander riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT maioranoandrea riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT mosbachschulzolaf riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT pautassomarco riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT tramontinisara riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu
AT vicentciveraantonio riskassessmentofxanthomonascitripvviticolafortheeu