Cargando…
Unlawful killing at inquests: Clarity or confusion?
This article examines the standard of proof for unlawful killing in coronial proceedings. Historically, the criminal standard of proof governed inquest findings of unlawful killing. In R (Maughan) v Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire, the Supreme Court resolved the important question of wh...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35694742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00258172221099080 |
_version_ | 1784842676375388160 |
---|---|
author | Kelly, Gerard |
author_facet | Kelly, Gerard |
author_sort | Kelly, Gerard |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article examines the standard of proof for unlawful killing in coronial proceedings. Historically, the criminal standard of proof governed inquest findings of unlawful killing. In R (Maughan) v Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire, the Supreme Court resolved the important question of whether the criminal or civil standard governed inquest conclusions of unlawful killing. The court concluded that the correct standard of proof for all conclusions in coronial proceedings is the balance of probabilities. This article argues that whilst preserving differing standards of proof in coronial proceedings was no longer defensible and Maughan has provided welcome clarity, unanswered questions remain concerning the implementation of this fundamental change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9716378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97163782022-12-03 Unlawful killing at inquests: Clarity or confusion? Kelly, Gerard Med Leg J Commentaries This article examines the standard of proof for unlawful killing in coronial proceedings. Historically, the criminal standard of proof governed inquest findings of unlawful killing. In R (Maughan) v Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire, the Supreme Court resolved the important question of whether the criminal or civil standard governed inquest conclusions of unlawful killing. The court concluded that the correct standard of proof for all conclusions in coronial proceedings is the balance of probabilities. This article argues that whilst preserving differing standards of proof in coronial proceedings was no longer defensible and Maughan has provided welcome clarity, unanswered questions remain concerning the implementation of this fundamental change. SAGE Publications 2022-06-13 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9716378/ /pubmed/35694742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00258172221099080 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Commentaries Kelly, Gerard Unlawful killing at inquests: Clarity or confusion? |
title | Unlawful killing at inquests: Clarity or confusion? |
title_full | Unlawful killing at inquests: Clarity or confusion? |
title_fullStr | Unlawful killing at inquests: Clarity or confusion? |
title_full_unstemmed | Unlawful killing at inquests: Clarity or confusion? |
title_short | Unlawful killing at inquests: Clarity or confusion? |
title_sort | unlawful killing at inquests: clarity or confusion? |
topic | Commentaries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35694742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00258172221099080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kellygerard unlawfulkillingatinquestsclarityorconfusion |