Cargando…

Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: A systematic review

Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the utility of functional outcome measures reported in intervention trials between 2010 and 2020, and to map these measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model. Method: The search was c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norton, Briony, Bugden, Benjamin, Liu, Karen PY
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15691861221114264
_version_ 1784842696276312064
author Norton, Briony
Bugden, Benjamin
Liu, Karen PY
author_facet Norton, Briony
Bugden, Benjamin
Liu, Karen PY
author_sort Norton, Briony
collection PubMed
description Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the utility of functional outcome measures reported in intervention trials between 2010 and 2020, and to map these measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model. Method: The search was carried out on MEDLINE, CINAHL and Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials. Peer-reviewed intervention studies detailing the functional outcome measures used for any treatment for distal radius fracture were selected. Participant characteristics, outcome measures reported and the trends in their use over time and geographical locations were extracted. Results: This review analysed 119 studies. Thirty-one functional outcome measures were used across 36 countries. Ninety-two percent of studies measured both the Body Function/Structure and Activity/Participation domains of the ICF. The most frequently used measures were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, Range of Motion and Grip Strength. There is a lack of measures on successful return to meaningful occupation. Conclusion: The outcome measures identified were equally spread across the ICF domains. There is a growing importance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to supplement performance-based measures, but a lack of measure on successful return to meaningful occupation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9716466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97164662022-12-03 Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: A systematic review Norton, Briony Bugden, Benjamin Liu, Karen PY Hong Kong J Occup Ther Reviews Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the utility of functional outcome measures reported in intervention trials between 2010 and 2020, and to map these measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model. Method: The search was carried out on MEDLINE, CINAHL and Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials. Peer-reviewed intervention studies detailing the functional outcome measures used for any treatment for distal radius fracture were selected. Participant characteristics, outcome measures reported and the trends in their use over time and geographical locations were extracted. Results: This review analysed 119 studies. Thirty-one functional outcome measures were used across 36 countries. Ninety-two percent of studies measured both the Body Function/Structure and Activity/Participation domains of the ICF. The most frequently used measures were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, Range of Motion and Grip Strength. There is a lack of measures on successful return to meaningful occupation. Conclusion: The outcome measures identified were equally spread across the ICF domains. There is a growing importance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to supplement performance-based measures, but a lack of measure on successful return to meaningful occupation. SAGE Publications 2022-08-11 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9716466/ /pubmed/36467517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15691861221114264 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Reviews
Norton, Briony
Bugden, Benjamin
Liu, Karen PY
Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: A systematic review
title Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: A systematic review
title_full Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: A systematic review
title_fullStr Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: A systematic review
title_short Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: A systematic review
title_sort functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36467517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15691861221114264
work_keys_str_mv AT nortonbriony functionaloutcomemeasuresfordistalradiusfracturesasystematicreview
AT bugdenbenjamin functionaloutcomemeasuresfordistalradiusfracturesasystematicreview
AT liukarenpy functionaloutcomemeasuresfordistalradiusfracturesasystematicreview