Cargando…

State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use

BACKGROUND: Such patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-centered outcome measures as the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS), Phase of Illness, and IPOS Views on Care (IPOS VoC), facilitate patient-centered care and help improve quality. To ensure sustainability, implement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seipp, Hannah, Haasenritter, Jörg, Hach, Michaela, Becker, Dorothée, Schütze, Dania, Engler, Jennifer, Bösner, Stefan, Kuss, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01109-w
_version_ 1784842739348668416
author Seipp, Hannah
Haasenritter, Jörg
Hach, Michaela
Becker, Dorothée
Schütze, Dania
Engler, Jennifer
Bösner, Stefan
Kuss, Katrin
author_facet Seipp, Hannah
Haasenritter, Jörg
Hach, Michaela
Becker, Dorothée
Schütze, Dania
Engler, Jennifer
Bösner, Stefan
Kuss, Katrin
author_sort Seipp, Hannah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Such patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-centered outcome measures as the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS), Phase of Illness, and IPOS Views on Care (IPOS VoC), facilitate patient-centered care and help improve quality. To ensure sustainability, implementation and usage should be adapted according to setting. When settings involve several distinct teams that differ in terms of views and working practices, it is more difficult to integrate outcome measures into daily care. The ELSAH study aimed to learn how health professionals working in specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC) viewed the use of these outcome measures in daily care, and what they express is needed for successful sustainable, state-wide application. METHODS: We used a parallel mixed-methods design involving three focus groups (n = 14) and an online-survey based on normalization process theory (n = 76). Most participants were nurses and physicians from 19 SOPC-teams in Hesse, Germany. We used a triangulation protocol including convergence coding matrices to triangulate findings. RESULTS: The majority of health professionals were able to integrate the outcome measures into their working lives and said that it had become a normal part of their day-to-day work. To ensure their sustainable integration into daily care, the motivation and concerns of health professionals should be taken into consideration. Health professionals must clearly recognize how the measures help improve daily care and quality evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: To implement the outcome measures in a number of teams, it will be necessary to take individual team characteristics into account, because they influence motivation and concerncs. Further, it will be necessary to offer opportunities for them to engage in peer support and share information with other teams. The sustainable use of outcome measures in SOPC will require continuous support within each team as well as across teams. When several distinct teams are working in the same setting, a cross-team coordination unit can help to coordinate their work efficiently. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00012421; www.germanctr.de/DRKS00012421 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-01109-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9716659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97166592022-12-03 State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use Seipp, Hannah Haasenritter, Jörg Hach, Michaela Becker, Dorothée Schütze, Dania Engler, Jennifer Bösner, Stefan Kuss, Katrin BMC Palliat Care Research BACKGROUND: Such patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-centered outcome measures as the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS), Phase of Illness, and IPOS Views on Care (IPOS VoC), facilitate patient-centered care and help improve quality. To ensure sustainability, implementation and usage should be adapted according to setting. When settings involve several distinct teams that differ in terms of views and working practices, it is more difficult to integrate outcome measures into daily care. The ELSAH study aimed to learn how health professionals working in specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC) viewed the use of these outcome measures in daily care, and what they express is needed for successful sustainable, state-wide application. METHODS: We used a parallel mixed-methods design involving three focus groups (n = 14) and an online-survey based on normalization process theory (n = 76). Most participants were nurses and physicians from 19 SOPC-teams in Hesse, Germany. We used a triangulation protocol including convergence coding matrices to triangulate findings. RESULTS: The majority of health professionals were able to integrate the outcome measures into their working lives and said that it had become a normal part of their day-to-day work. To ensure their sustainable integration into daily care, the motivation and concerns of health professionals should be taken into consideration. Health professionals must clearly recognize how the measures help improve daily care and quality evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: To implement the outcome measures in a number of teams, it will be necessary to take individual team characteristics into account, because they influence motivation and concerncs. Further, it will be necessary to offer opportunities for them to engage in peer support and share information with other teams. The sustainable use of outcome measures in SOPC will require continuous support within each team as well as across teams. When several distinct teams are working in the same setting, a cross-team coordination unit can help to coordinate their work efficiently. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00012421; www.germanctr.de/DRKS00012421 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-01109-w. BioMed Central 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9716659/ /pubmed/36461081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01109-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Seipp, Hannah
Haasenritter, Jörg
Hach, Michaela
Becker, Dorothée
Schütze, Dania
Engler, Jennifer
Bösner, Stefan
Kuss, Katrin
State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use
title State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use
title_full State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use
title_fullStr State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use
title_full_unstemmed State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use
title_short State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use
title_sort state-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (proms) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (elsah): a mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01109-w
work_keys_str_mv AT seipphannah statewideimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinspecializedoutpatientpalliativecareteamselsahamixedmethodsevaluationandimplicationsfortheirsustainableuse
AT haasenritterjorg statewideimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinspecializedoutpatientpalliativecareteamselsahamixedmethodsevaluationandimplicationsfortheirsustainableuse
AT hachmichaela statewideimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinspecializedoutpatientpalliativecareteamselsahamixedmethodsevaluationandimplicationsfortheirsustainableuse
AT beckerdorothee statewideimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinspecializedoutpatientpalliativecareteamselsahamixedmethodsevaluationandimplicationsfortheirsustainableuse
AT schutzedania statewideimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinspecializedoutpatientpalliativecareteamselsahamixedmethodsevaluationandimplicationsfortheirsustainableuse
AT englerjennifer statewideimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinspecializedoutpatientpalliativecareteamselsahamixedmethodsevaluationandimplicationsfortheirsustainableuse
AT bosnerstefan statewideimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinspecializedoutpatientpalliativecareteamselsahamixedmethodsevaluationandimplicationsfortheirsustainableuse
AT kusskatrin statewideimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinspecializedoutpatientpalliativecareteamselsahamixedmethodsevaluationandimplicationsfortheirsustainableuse