Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators of digital interventions use to reduce loneliness among older adults: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Digital interventions are considered as a potential solution to loneliness in older adults. However, this type of intervention has had limited acceptance among older adults (aged ≥60 years). To ensure the use of digital interventions in older adults, possible barriers and facilitating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hongyu, Välimäki, Maritta, Li, Xiaoyang, Nan, Jiahui, Wu, Shuang, Zeng, Xianmei, Duan, Yunzhu, Feng, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36456019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067858
_version_ 1784842764919242752
author Zhang, Hongyu
Välimäki, Maritta
Li, Xiaoyang
Nan, Jiahui
Wu, Shuang
Zeng, Xianmei
Duan, Yunzhu
Feng, Hui
author_facet Zhang, Hongyu
Välimäki, Maritta
Li, Xiaoyang
Nan, Jiahui
Wu, Shuang
Zeng, Xianmei
Duan, Yunzhu
Feng, Hui
author_sort Zhang, Hongyu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Digital interventions are considered as a potential solution to loneliness in older adults. However, this type of intervention has had limited acceptance among older adults (aged ≥60 years). To ensure the use of digital interventions in older adults, possible barriers and facilitating factors should be better understood from the user’s perspective. We aim to systematically examine the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital interventions designed to reduce loneliness in older adults by identifying, evaluating and synthesising qualitative studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive search of qualitative studies for barriers and facilitators for use of digital interventions will be conducted in the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Studies reported in English will be considered for this review. Grey literature will not be included. Two reviewers (HZ and XL) will independently screen the literatures, and any differences will be solved by turning to the third reviewer (JN). The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Qualitative Research Critical Appraisal Checklist will be used by two reviewers to independently assess the validity of the methods used. Relevant data about the populations, context, culture, geographical location, study methods and barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital interventions will be extracted using the JBI standardised data extraction tool. JBI meta-aggregation methods will be implemented to synthesise the data, which will generate themes and categories based on the data. The final synthesis will establish confidence levels using the JBI ConQual approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol does not require ethical approval. The data are based on published scientific databases. The results will be disseminated through journal articles and scientific conference presentations (if feasible). PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022328609.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9716780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97167802022-12-03 Barriers and facilitators of digital interventions use to reduce loneliness among older adults: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review Zhang, Hongyu Välimäki, Maritta Li, Xiaoyang Nan, Jiahui Wu, Shuang Zeng, Xianmei Duan, Yunzhu Feng, Hui BMJ Open Nursing INTRODUCTION: Digital interventions are considered as a potential solution to loneliness in older adults. However, this type of intervention has had limited acceptance among older adults (aged ≥60 years). To ensure the use of digital interventions in older adults, possible barriers and facilitating factors should be better understood from the user’s perspective. We aim to systematically examine the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital interventions designed to reduce loneliness in older adults by identifying, evaluating and synthesising qualitative studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive search of qualitative studies for barriers and facilitators for use of digital interventions will be conducted in the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Studies reported in English will be considered for this review. Grey literature will not be included. Two reviewers (HZ and XL) will independently screen the literatures, and any differences will be solved by turning to the third reviewer (JN). The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Qualitative Research Critical Appraisal Checklist will be used by two reviewers to independently assess the validity of the methods used. Relevant data about the populations, context, culture, geographical location, study methods and barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital interventions will be extracted using the JBI standardised data extraction tool. JBI meta-aggregation methods will be implemented to synthesise the data, which will generate themes and categories based on the data. The final synthesis will establish confidence levels using the JBI ConQual approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol does not require ethical approval. The data are based on published scientific databases. The results will be disseminated through journal articles and scientific conference presentations (if feasible). PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022328609. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9716780/ /pubmed/36456019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067858 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Nursing
Zhang, Hongyu
Välimäki, Maritta
Li, Xiaoyang
Nan, Jiahui
Wu, Shuang
Zeng, Xianmei
Duan, Yunzhu
Feng, Hui
Barriers and facilitators of digital interventions use to reduce loneliness among older adults: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review
title Barriers and facilitators of digital interventions use to reduce loneliness among older adults: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review
title_full Barriers and facilitators of digital interventions use to reduce loneliness among older adults: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators of digital interventions use to reduce loneliness among older adults: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators of digital interventions use to reduce loneliness among older adults: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review
title_short Barriers and facilitators of digital interventions use to reduce loneliness among older adults: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review
title_sort barriers and facilitators of digital interventions use to reduce loneliness among older adults: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36456019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067858
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghongyu barriersandfacilitatorsofdigitalinterventionsusetoreducelonelinessamongolderadultsaprotocolforaqualitativesystematicreview
AT valimakimaritta barriersandfacilitatorsofdigitalinterventionsusetoreducelonelinessamongolderadultsaprotocolforaqualitativesystematicreview
AT lixiaoyang barriersandfacilitatorsofdigitalinterventionsusetoreducelonelinessamongolderadultsaprotocolforaqualitativesystematicreview
AT nanjiahui barriersandfacilitatorsofdigitalinterventionsusetoreducelonelinessamongolderadultsaprotocolforaqualitativesystematicreview
AT wushuang barriersandfacilitatorsofdigitalinterventionsusetoreducelonelinessamongolderadultsaprotocolforaqualitativesystematicreview
AT zengxianmei barriersandfacilitatorsofdigitalinterventionsusetoreducelonelinessamongolderadultsaprotocolforaqualitativesystematicreview
AT duanyunzhu barriersandfacilitatorsofdigitalinterventionsusetoreducelonelinessamongolderadultsaprotocolforaqualitativesystematicreview
AT fenghui barriersandfacilitatorsofdigitalinterventionsusetoreducelonelinessamongolderadultsaprotocolforaqualitativesystematicreview