Cargando…

Feasibility of one-shot dilation access in the pediatric age group

OBJECTIVE: To compare sequential fascial dilation (SFD) versus one-shot dilation (OSD) in the pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS: The present study is an observational study. The study subjects were divided into two groups. In group 1, renal dilation was done using t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srivastava, Alok, Yadav, Krishna Kumar, Singh, Anjana, Srivastava, Anoop Kumar, Singh, Sanjeet Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2021-000311
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare sequential fascial dilation (SFD) versus one-shot dilation (OSD) in the pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS: The present study is an observational study. The study subjects were divided into two groups. In group 1, renal dilation was done using the SFD and in group 2, renal dilation was done using the OSD. The amount of time exposed to radiation during access to pelvicalyceal system was estimated. Complications, stone free rates, ancillary procedures for residual stones and hospital stay were compared. Modified Clavien-Dindo classification was used for grading the complications. RESULTS: Radiation exposure and operative time were less in OSD group (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.068 to 14.072, and 2.565 to 12.435, p<0.005). The mean drop of hematocrit was statistically less significant in OSD group (p=0.032). In both groups, complications, stone free rate and hospital stay were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: OSD is feasible in the children with reduced radiation exposure and shorter operative time. The outcome was similar to SFD.