Cargando…

Feasibility of one-shot dilation access in the pediatric age group

OBJECTIVE: To compare sequential fascial dilation (SFD) versus one-shot dilation (OSD) in the pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS: The present study is an observational study. The study subjects were divided into two groups. In group 1, renal dilation was done using t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srivastava, Alok, Yadav, Krishna Kumar, Singh, Anjana, Srivastava, Anoop Kumar, Singh, Sanjeet Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2021-000311
_version_ 1784842780023980032
author Srivastava, Alok
Yadav, Krishna Kumar
Singh, Anjana
Srivastava, Anoop Kumar
Singh, Sanjeet Kumar
author_facet Srivastava, Alok
Yadav, Krishna Kumar
Singh, Anjana
Srivastava, Anoop Kumar
Singh, Sanjeet Kumar
author_sort Srivastava, Alok
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare sequential fascial dilation (SFD) versus one-shot dilation (OSD) in the pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS: The present study is an observational study. The study subjects were divided into two groups. In group 1, renal dilation was done using the SFD and in group 2, renal dilation was done using the OSD. The amount of time exposed to radiation during access to pelvicalyceal system was estimated. Complications, stone free rates, ancillary procedures for residual stones and hospital stay were compared. Modified Clavien-Dindo classification was used for grading the complications. RESULTS: Radiation exposure and operative time were less in OSD group (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.068 to 14.072, and 2.565 to 12.435, p<0.005). The mean drop of hematocrit was statistically less significant in OSD group (p=0.032). In both groups, complications, stone free rate and hospital stay were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: OSD is feasible in the children with reduced radiation exposure and shorter operative time. The outcome was similar to SFD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9716858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97168582022-12-05 Feasibility of one-shot dilation access in the pediatric age group Srivastava, Alok Yadav, Krishna Kumar Singh, Anjana Srivastava, Anoop Kumar Singh, Sanjeet Kumar World J Pediatr Surg Original Research OBJECTIVE: To compare sequential fascial dilation (SFD) versus one-shot dilation (OSD) in the pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS: The present study is an observational study. The study subjects were divided into two groups. In group 1, renal dilation was done using the SFD and in group 2, renal dilation was done using the OSD. The amount of time exposed to radiation during access to pelvicalyceal system was estimated. Complications, stone free rates, ancillary procedures for residual stones and hospital stay were compared. Modified Clavien-Dindo classification was used for grading the complications. RESULTS: Radiation exposure and operative time were less in OSD group (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.068 to 14.072, and 2.565 to 12.435, p<0.005). The mean drop of hematocrit was statistically less significant in OSD group (p=0.032). In both groups, complications, stone free rate and hospital stay were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: OSD is feasible in the children with reduced radiation exposure and shorter operative time. The outcome was similar to SFD. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9716858/ /pubmed/36474623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2021-000311 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Srivastava, Alok
Yadav, Krishna Kumar
Singh, Anjana
Srivastava, Anoop Kumar
Singh, Sanjeet Kumar
Feasibility of one-shot dilation access in the pediatric age group
title Feasibility of one-shot dilation access in the pediatric age group
title_full Feasibility of one-shot dilation access in the pediatric age group
title_fullStr Feasibility of one-shot dilation access in the pediatric age group
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of one-shot dilation access in the pediatric age group
title_short Feasibility of one-shot dilation access in the pediatric age group
title_sort feasibility of one-shot dilation access in the pediatric age group
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9716858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2021-000311
work_keys_str_mv AT srivastavaalok feasibilityofoneshotdilationaccessinthepediatricagegroup
AT yadavkrishnakumar feasibilityofoneshotdilationaccessinthepediatricagegroup
AT singhanjana feasibilityofoneshotdilationaccessinthepediatricagegroup
AT srivastavaanoopkumar feasibilityofoneshotdilationaccessinthepediatricagegroup
AT singhsanjeetkumar feasibilityofoneshotdilationaccessinthepediatricagegroup