Cargando…

General practitioners’ (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: The proliferation and growing demands of genetic testing are anticipated to revolutionise medical practice. As gatekeepers of healthcare systems, general practitioners (GPs) are expected to play a critical role in the provision of clinical genetic services. This paper aims to review exist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ong, Cheryl Siow Bin, Fok, Rose Wai‑Yee, Tan, Ryo Chee Ann, Fung, Si Ming, Sun, Shirley, Ngeow, Joanne Yuen Yie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9717000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36450397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001515
_version_ 1784842811435122688
author Ong, Cheryl Siow Bin
Fok, Rose Wai‑Yee
Tan, Ryo Chee Ann
Fung, Si Ming
Sun, Shirley
Ngeow, Joanne Yuen Yie
author_facet Ong, Cheryl Siow Bin
Fok, Rose Wai‑Yee
Tan, Ryo Chee Ann
Fung, Si Ming
Sun, Shirley
Ngeow, Joanne Yuen Yie
author_sort Ong, Cheryl Siow Bin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The proliferation and growing demands of genetic testing are anticipated to revolutionise medical practice. As gatekeepers of healthcare systems, general practitioners (GPs) are expected to play a critical role in the provision of clinical genetic services. This paper aims to review existing literature on GPs’ experience, attitudes and needs towards clinical genetic services. DESIGN: A systematic mixed studies review of papers published between 2010 and 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The inclusion criterion was peer-reviewed articles in English and related to GPs’ experience, views and needs on any genetic testing. INFORMATION SOURCES: The PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, EMBASE databases were searched using Mesh terms, Boolean and wildcards combinations to identify peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2022. Study quality was assessed using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Only articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected. A thematic meta-synthesis was conducted on the final sample of selected articles to identify key themes. RESULTS: A total of 62 articles were included in the review. Uncertainty over GPs’ role in providing genetic services were attributed by the lack of confidence and time constraints and rarity of cases may further exacerbate their reluctance to shoulder an expanded role in clinical genetics. Although educational interventions were found to increasing GPs’ knowledge and confidence to carry out genetic tasks, varied interest on genetic testing and preference for a shared care model with other genetic health professionals have resulted in minimal translation to clinical adoption. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the need for deeper exploration of GPs’ varied experience and attitudes towards clinical genetic services to better facilitate targeted intervention in the adoption of clinical genetics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9717000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97170002022-12-03 General practitioners’ (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review Ong, Cheryl Siow Bin Fok, Rose Wai‑Yee Tan, Ryo Chee Ann Fung, Si Ming Sun, Shirley Ngeow, Joanne Yuen Yie Fam Med Community Health Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: The proliferation and growing demands of genetic testing are anticipated to revolutionise medical practice. As gatekeepers of healthcare systems, general practitioners (GPs) are expected to play a critical role in the provision of clinical genetic services. This paper aims to review existing literature on GPs’ experience, attitudes and needs towards clinical genetic services. DESIGN: A systematic mixed studies review of papers published between 2010 and 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The inclusion criterion was peer-reviewed articles in English and related to GPs’ experience, views and needs on any genetic testing. INFORMATION SOURCES: The PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, EMBASE databases were searched using Mesh terms, Boolean and wildcards combinations to identify peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2022. Study quality was assessed using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Only articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected. A thematic meta-synthesis was conducted on the final sample of selected articles to identify key themes. RESULTS: A total of 62 articles were included in the review. Uncertainty over GPs’ role in providing genetic services were attributed by the lack of confidence and time constraints and rarity of cases may further exacerbate their reluctance to shoulder an expanded role in clinical genetics. Although educational interventions were found to increasing GPs’ knowledge and confidence to carry out genetic tasks, varied interest on genetic testing and preference for a shared care model with other genetic health professionals have resulted in minimal translation to clinical adoption. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the need for deeper exploration of GPs’ varied experience and attitudes towards clinical genetic services to better facilitate targeted intervention in the adoption of clinical genetics. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9717000/ /pubmed/36450397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001515 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ong, Cheryl Siow Bin
Fok, Rose Wai‑Yee
Tan, Ryo Chee Ann
Fung, Si Ming
Sun, Shirley
Ngeow, Joanne Yuen Yie
General practitioners’ (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review
title General practitioners’ (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review
title_full General practitioners’ (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review
title_fullStr General practitioners’ (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed General practitioners’ (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review
title_short General practitioners’ (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review
title_sort general practitioners’ (gps) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9717000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36450397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001515
work_keys_str_mv AT ongcherylsiowbin generalpractitionersgpsexperienceattitudesandneedsonclinicalgeneticservicesasystematicreview
AT fokrosewaiyee generalpractitionersgpsexperienceattitudesandneedsonclinicalgeneticservicesasystematicreview
AT tanryocheeann generalpractitionersgpsexperienceattitudesandneedsonclinicalgeneticservicesasystematicreview
AT fungsiming generalpractitionersgpsexperienceattitudesandneedsonclinicalgeneticservicesasystematicreview
AT sunshirley generalpractitionersgpsexperienceattitudesandneedsonclinicalgeneticservicesasystematicreview
AT ngeowjoanneyuenyie generalpractitionersgpsexperienceattitudesandneedsonclinicalgeneticservicesasystematicreview