A comparison of patients with neck abscesses caused by esophageal foreign body impaction vs. inflammatory disease: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES: During clinical practice, we have detected a few cases of neck abscesses in patients diagnosed with esophageal foreign body impaction (EFB) but without the primary inflammatory disease. However, we do not know if neck abscesses caused by an inflammatory source are more like to be associated with a more severe progression or poorer prognosis. In this study, we aimed to identify differences between these two groups of patients by comparing progression and prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent neck abscess incisions between January 2011 and March 2022 and divided these patients into two groups: an EFB group and an inflammation group. Data were described by percentages, means, and standard deviations (SDs). Fisher's precision probability test was used to compare differences between the EFB and inflammation groups. Categorical variables were analyzed by Pearson's Chi-squared test. In addition, three factors including hospital days, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and drainage-tube removal time were used for multivariate analysis to identify independent correlations separately. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 33 patients with neck abscesses who received surgical incisions; the EFB group included 14 (42%) cases, while the inflammatory group included 19 (58%) cases. No significant differences were identified between the two groups in terms of surgery type (with or without mediastinotomy) and postoperative management (negative pressure drainage or postoperative irrigation). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, the timing of drainage-tube removal, the risk of ICU admission, and the probability of receiving intubation and tracheotomy. The incidence rate of esophageal perforation differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in terms of other preoperative or postoperative comorbidities. The multivariate analysis revealed that the application of mediastinotomy (HR = 0.216 [0.049, 0.963]; p = 0.044) was correlated with a longer stay in the hospital. The time from symptoms to surgery was associated with a longer drainage tube removal time (HR = 0.392 [0.159, 0.967]; P = 0.042) and longer ICU stay (OR = 79.754[1.513, 4203.182]; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients with neck abscesses associated with EFB and inflammation received the same therapeutic management, and there were no significant differences between these two groups in terms of prognosis. Furthermore, esophageal perforation was found to be irrelevant to the aggravation of neck abscesses, and there was no need for additional surgery to repair a perforated esophagus in patients with neck abscesses. Level of evidence: Retrospective cohort (2b).