Cargando…
Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Usability is a key factor affecting the acceptance of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) for elderly individuals, but traditional usability evaluation methods may not be suitable for use in this population because of aging barriers. The objectives of this study were to identify, e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9717549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02064-5 |
_version_ | 1784842923148312576 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Qiuyi Liu, Jing Zhou, Lanshu Tian, Jing Chen, Xuemei Zhang, Wei Wang, He Zhou, Wanqiong Gao, Yitian |
author_facet | Wang, Qiuyi Liu, Jing Zhou, Lanshu Tian, Jing Chen, Xuemei Zhang, Wei Wang, He Zhou, Wanqiong Gao, Yitian |
author_sort | Wang, Qiuyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Usability is a key factor affecting the acceptance of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) for elderly individuals, but traditional usability evaluation methods may not be suitable for use in this population because of aging barriers. The objectives of this study were to identify, explore, and summarize the current state of the literature on the usability evaluation of mHealth apps for older adults and to incorporate these methods into the appropriate evaluation stage. METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted in 10 databases. Inclusion criteria were articles focused on the usability evaluation of mHealth apps designed for older adults. The included studies were classified according to the mHealth app usability evaluation framework, and the suitability of evaluation methods for use among the elderly was analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Research activity increased steeply after 2013 (n = 92). Satisfaction (n = 74) and learnability (n = 60) were the most frequently evaluated critical measures, while memorability (n = 13) was the least evaluated. The ratios of satisfaction, learnability, operability, and understandability measures were significantly related to the different stages of evaluation (P < 0.05). The methods used for usability evaluation were questionnaire (n = 68), interview (n = 36), concurrent thinking aloud (n = 25), performance metrics (n = 25), behavioral observation log (n = 14), screen recording (n = 3), eye tracking (n = 1), retrospective thinking aloud (n = 1), and feedback log (n = 1). Thirty-two studies developed their own evaluation tool to assess unique design features for elderly individuals. CONCLUSION: In the past five years, the number of studies in the field of usability evaluation of mHealth apps for the elderly has increased rapidly. The mHealth apps are often used as an auxiliary means of self-management to help the elderly manage their wellness and disease. According to the three stages of the mHealth app usability evaluation framework, the critical measures and evaluation methods are inconsistent. Future research should focus on selecting specific critical measures relevant to aging characteristics and adapting usability evaluation methods to elderly individuals by improving traditional tools, introducing automated evaluation tools and optimizing evaluation processes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-02064-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9717549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97175492022-12-03 Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review Wang, Qiuyi Liu, Jing Zhou, Lanshu Tian, Jing Chen, Xuemei Zhang, Wei Wang, He Zhou, Wanqiong Gao, Yitian BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: Usability is a key factor affecting the acceptance of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) for elderly individuals, but traditional usability evaluation methods may not be suitable for use in this population because of aging barriers. The objectives of this study were to identify, explore, and summarize the current state of the literature on the usability evaluation of mHealth apps for older adults and to incorporate these methods into the appropriate evaluation stage. METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted in 10 databases. Inclusion criteria were articles focused on the usability evaluation of mHealth apps designed for older adults. The included studies were classified according to the mHealth app usability evaluation framework, and the suitability of evaluation methods for use among the elderly was analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Research activity increased steeply after 2013 (n = 92). Satisfaction (n = 74) and learnability (n = 60) were the most frequently evaluated critical measures, while memorability (n = 13) was the least evaluated. The ratios of satisfaction, learnability, operability, and understandability measures were significantly related to the different stages of evaluation (P < 0.05). The methods used for usability evaluation were questionnaire (n = 68), interview (n = 36), concurrent thinking aloud (n = 25), performance metrics (n = 25), behavioral observation log (n = 14), screen recording (n = 3), eye tracking (n = 1), retrospective thinking aloud (n = 1), and feedback log (n = 1). Thirty-two studies developed their own evaluation tool to assess unique design features for elderly individuals. CONCLUSION: In the past five years, the number of studies in the field of usability evaluation of mHealth apps for the elderly has increased rapidly. The mHealth apps are often used as an auxiliary means of self-management to help the elderly manage their wellness and disease. According to the three stages of the mHealth app usability evaluation framework, the critical measures and evaluation methods are inconsistent. Future research should focus on selecting specific critical measures relevant to aging characteristics and adapting usability evaluation methods to elderly individuals by improving traditional tools, introducing automated evaluation tools and optimizing evaluation processes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-02064-5. BioMed Central 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9717549/ /pubmed/36461017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02064-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wang, Qiuyi Liu, Jing Zhou, Lanshu Tian, Jing Chen, Xuemei Zhang, Wei Wang, He Zhou, Wanqiong Gao, Yitian Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review |
title | Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review |
title_full | Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review |
title_short | Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review |
title_sort | usability evaluation of mhealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9717549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02064-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangqiuyi usabilityevaluationofmhealthappsforelderlyindividualsascopingreview AT liujing usabilityevaluationofmhealthappsforelderlyindividualsascopingreview AT zhoulanshu usabilityevaluationofmhealthappsforelderlyindividualsascopingreview AT tianjing usabilityevaluationofmhealthappsforelderlyindividualsascopingreview AT chenxuemei usabilityevaluationofmhealthappsforelderlyindividualsascopingreview AT zhangwei usabilityevaluationofmhealthappsforelderlyindividualsascopingreview AT wanghe usabilityevaluationofmhealthappsforelderlyindividualsascopingreview AT zhouwanqiong usabilityevaluationofmhealthappsforelderlyindividualsascopingreview AT gaoyitian usabilityevaluationofmhealthappsforelderlyindividualsascopingreview |