Cargando…

Self-assessment of cochlear health by cochlear implant recipients

Recent technological advances in cochlear implant (CI) telemetry have enabled, for the first time, CI users to perform cochlear health (CH) measurements through self-assessment for prolonged periods of time. This is important to better understand the influence of CH on CI outcomes, and to assess the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mushtaq, Faizah, Soulby, Andrew, Boyle, Patrick, Nunn, Terry, Hartley, Douglas E. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9717610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36468071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1042408
_version_ 1784842937233833984
author Mushtaq, Faizah
Soulby, Andrew
Boyle, Patrick
Nunn, Terry
Hartley, Douglas E. H.
author_facet Mushtaq, Faizah
Soulby, Andrew
Boyle, Patrick
Nunn, Terry
Hartley, Douglas E. H.
author_sort Mushtaq, Faizah
collection PubMed
description Recent technological advances in cochlear implant (CI) telemetry have enabled, for the first time, CI users to perform cochlear health (CH) measurements through self-assessment for prolonged periods of time. This is important to better understand the influence of CH on CI outcomes, and to assess the safety and efficacy of future novel treatments for deafness that will be administered as adjunctive therapies to cochlear implantation. We evaluated the feasibility of using a CI to assess CH and examined patterns of electrode impedances, electrically-evoked compound action potentials (eCAPs) and electrocochleography (ECochGs), over time, in a group of adult CI recipients. Fifteen subjects were trained to use the Active Insertion Monitoring tablet by Advanced Bionics, at home for 12 weeks to independently record impedances twice daily, eCAPs once weekly and ECochGs daily in the first week, and weekly thereafter. Participants also completed behavioral hearing and speech assessments. Group level measurement compliance was 98.9% for impedances, 100% for eCAPs and 99.6% for ECochGs. Electrode impedances remained stable over time, with only minimal variation observed. Morning impedances were significantly higher than evening measurements, and impedances increased toward the base of the cochlea. eCAP thresholds were also highly repeatable, with all subjects showing 100% measurement consistency at, at least one electrode. Just over half of all subjects showed consistently absent thresholds at one or more electrodes, potentially suggesting the existence of cochlear dead regions. All subjects met UK NICE guidelines for cochlear implantation, so were expected to have little residual hearing. ECochG thresholds were, unsurprisingly, highly erratic and did not correlate with audiometric thresholds, though lower ECochG thresholds showed more repeatability over time than higher thresholds. We conclude that it is feasible for CI users to independently record CH measurements using their CI, and electrode impedances and eCAPs are promising measurements for objectively assessing CH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9717610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97176102022-12-03 Self-assessment of cochlear health by cochlear implant recipients Mushtaq, Faizah Soulby, Andrew Boyle, Patrick Nunn, Terry Hartley, Douglas E. H. Front Neurol Neurology Recent technological advances in cochlear implant (CI) telemetry have enabled, for the first time, CI users to perform cochlear health (CH) measurements through self-assessment for prolonged periods of time. This is important to better understand the influence of CH on CI outcomes, and to assess the safety and efficacy of future novel treatments for deafness that will be administered as adjunctive therapies to cochlear implantation. We evaluated the feasibility of using a CI to assess CH and examined patterns of electrode impedances, electrically-evoked compound action potentials (eCAPs) and electrocochleography (ECochGs), over time, in a group of adult CI recipients. Fifteen subjects were trained to use the Active Insertion Monitoring tablet by Advanced Bionics, at home for 12 weeks to independently record impedances twice daily, eCAPs once weekly and ECochGs daily in the first week, and weekly thereafter. Participants also completed behavioral hearing and speech assessments. Group level measurement compliance was 98.9% for impedances, 100% for eCAPs and 99.6% for ECochGs. Electrode impedances remained stable over time, with only minimal variation observed. Morning impedances were significantly higher than evening measurements, and impedances increased toward the base of the cochlea. eCAP thresholds were also highly repeatable, with all subjects showing 100% measurement consistency at, at least one electrode. Just over half of all subjects showed consistently absent thresholds at one or more electrodes, potentially suggesting the existence of cochlear dead regions. All subjects met UK NICE guidelines for cochlear implantation, so were expected to have little residual hearing. ECochG thresholds were, unsurprisingly, highly erratic and did not correlate with audiometric thresholds, though lower ECochG thresholds showed more repeatability over time than higher thresholds. We conclude that it is feasible for CI users to independently record CH measurements using their CI, and electrode impedances and eCAPs are promising measurements for objectively assessing CH. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9717610/ /pubmed/36468071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1042408 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mushtaq, Soulby, Boyle, Nunn and Hartley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Mushtaq, Faizah
Soulby, Andrew
Boyle, Patrick
Nunn, Terry
Hartley, Douglas E. H.
Self-assessment of cochlear health by cochlear implant recipients
title Self-assessment of cochlear health by cochlear implant recipients
title_full Self-assessment of cochlear health by cochlear implant recipients
title_fullStr Self-assessment of cochlear health by cochlear implant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Self-assessment of cochlear health by cochlear implant recipients
title_short Self-assessment of cochlear health by cochlear implant recipients
title_sort self-assessment of cochlear health by cochlear implant recipients
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9717610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36468071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1042408
work_keys_str_mv AT mushtaqfaizah selfassessmentofcochlearhealthbycochlearimplantrecipients
AT soulbyandrew selfassessmentofcochlearhealthbycochlearimplantrecipients
AT boylepatrick selfassessmentofcochlearhealthbycochlearimplantrecipients
AT nunnterry selfassessmentofcochlearhealthbycochlearimplantrecipients
AT hartleydouglaseh selfassessmentofcochlearhealthbycochlearimplantrecipients