Cargando…

The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach

OBJECTIVE: This UK-wide OATech Network + consensus study utilised a Delphi approach to discern levels of awareness across an expert panel regarding the role of existing and novel technologies in osteoarthritis research. To direct future cross-disciplinary research it aimed to identify which could be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mennan, Claire, Hopkins, Timothy, Channon, Alastair, Elliott, Mark, Johnstone, Brian, Kadir, Timor, Loughlin, John, Peffers, Mandy, Pitsillides, Andrew, Sofat, Nidhi, Stewart, Caroline, Watt, Fiona E., Zeggini, Eleftheria, Holt, Cathy, Roberts, Sally
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100081
_version_ 1784843013347868672
author Mennan, Claire
Hopkins, Timothy
Channon, Alastair
Elliott, Mark
Johnstone, Brian
Kadir, Timor
Loughlin, John
Peffers, Mandy
Pitsillides, Andrew
Sofat, Nidhi
Stewart, Caroline
Watt, Fiona E.
Zeggini, Eleftheria
Holt, Cathy
Roberts, Sally
author_facet Mennan, Claire
Hopkins, Timothy
Channon, Alastair
Elliott, Mark
Johnstone, Brian
Kadir, Timor
Loughlin, John
Peffers, Mandy
Pitsillides, Andrew
Sofat, Nidhi
Stewart, Caroline
Watt, Fiona E.
Zeggini, Eleftheria
Holt, Cathy
Roberts, Sally
author_sort Mennan, Claire
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This UK-wide OATech Network + consensus study utilised a Delphi approach to discern levels of awareness across an expert panel regarding the role of existing and novel technologies in osteoarthritis research. To direct future cross-disciplinary research it aimed to identify which could be adopted to subcategorise patients with osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: An online questionnaire was formulated based on technologies which might aid OA research and subcategorisation. During a two-day face-to-face meeting concordance of expert opinion was established with surveys (23 questions) before, during and at the end of the meeting (Rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Experts spoke on current evidence for imaging, genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, biomarkers, activity monitoring, clinical engineering and machine learning relating to subcategorisation. For each round of voting, ≥80% votes led to consensus and ≤20% to exclusion of a statement. RESULTS: Panel members were unanimous that a combination of novel technological advances have potential to improve OA diagnostics and treatment through subcategorisation, agreeing in Rounds 1 and 2 that epigenetics, genetics, MRI, proteomics, wet biomarkers and machine learning could aid subcategorisation. Expert presentations changed participants’ opinions on the value of metabolomics, activity monitoring and clinical engineering, all reaching consensus in Round 2. X-rays lost consensus between Rounds 1 and 2; clinical X-rays reached consensus in Round 3. CONCLUSION: Consensus identified that 9 of the 11 technologies should be targeted towards OA subcategorisation to address existing OA research technology and knowledge gaps. These novel, rapidly evolving technologies are recommended as a focus for emergent, cross-disciplinary osteoarthritis research programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9718088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97180882022-12-05 The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach Mennan, Claire Hopkins, Timothy Channon, Alastair Elliott, Mark Johnstone, Brian Kadir, Timor Loughlin, John Peffers, Mandy Pitsillides, Andrew Sofat, Nidhi Stewart, Caroline Watt, Fiona E. Zeggini, Eleftheria Holt, Cathy Roberts, Sally Osteoarthr Cartil Open ORIGINAL PAPER OBJECTIVE: This UK-wide OATech Network + consensus study utilised a Delphi approach to discern levels of awareness across an expert panel regarding the role of existing and novel technologies in osteoarthritis research. To direct future cross-disciplinary research it aimed to identify which could be adopted to subcategorise patients with osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: An online questionnaire was formulated based on technologies which might aid OA research and subcategorisation. During a two-day face-to-face meeting concordance of expert opinion was established with surveys (23 questions) before, during and at the end of the meeting (Rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Experts spoke on current evidence for imaging, genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, biomarkers, activity monitoring, clinical engineering and machine learning relating to subcategorisation. For each round of voting, ≥80% votes led to consensus and ≤20% to exclusion of a statement. RESULTS: Panel members were unanimous that a combination of novel technological advances have potential to improve OA diagnostics and treatment through subcategorisation, agreeing in Rounds 1 and 2 that epigenetics, genetics, MRI, proteomics, wet biomarkers and machine learning could aid subcategorisation. Expert presentations changed participants’ opinions on the value of metabolomics, activity monitoring and clinical engineering, all reaching consensus in Round 2. X-rays lost consensus between Rounds 1 and 2; clinical X-rays reached consensus in Round 3. CONCLUSION: Consensus identified that 9 of the 11 technologies should be targeted towards OA subcategorisation to address existing OA research technology and knowledge gaps. These novel, rapidly evolving technologies are recommended as a focus for emergent, cross-disciplinary osteoarthritis research programmes. Elsevier 2020-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9718088/ /pubmed/36474678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100081 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle ORIGINAL PAPER
Mennan, Claire
Hopkins, Timothy
Channon, Alastair
Elliott, Mark
Johnstone, Brian
Kadir, Timor
Loughlin, John
Peffers, Mandy
Pitsillides, Andrew
Sofat, Nidhi
Stewart, Caroline
Watt, Fiona E.
Zeggini, Eleftheria
Holt, Cathy
Roberts, Sally
The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach
title The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach
title_full The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach
title_fullStr The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach
title_full_unstemmed The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach
title_short The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach
title_sort use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a delphi study approach
topic ORIGINAL PAPER
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100081
work_keys_str_mv AT mennanclaire theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT hopkinstimothy theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT channonalastair theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT elliottmark theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT johnstonebrian theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT kadirtimor theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT loughlinjohn theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT peffersmandy theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT pitsillidesandrew theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT sofatnidhi theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT stewartcaroline theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT wattfionae theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT zegginieleftheria theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT holtcathy theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT robertssally theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT mennanclaire useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT hopkinstimothy useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT channonalastair useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT elliottmark useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT johnstonebrian useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT kadirtimor useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT loughlinjohn useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT peffersmandy useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT pitsillidesandrew useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT sofatnidhi useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT stewartcaroline useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT wattfionae useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT zegginieleftheria useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT holtcathy useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT robertssally useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach
AT useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach