Cargando…
The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach
OBJECTIVE: This UK-wide OATech Network + consensus study utilised a Delphi approach to discern levels of awareness across an expert panel regarding the role of existing and novel technologies in osteoarthritis research. To direct future cross-disciplinary research it aimed to identify which could be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100081 |
_version_ | 1784843013347868672 |
---|---|
author | Mennan, Claire Hopkins, Timothy Channon, Alastair Elliott, Mark Johnstone, Brian Kadir, Timor Loughlin, John Peffers, Mandy Pitsillides, Andrew Sofat, Nidhi Stewart, Caroline Watt, Fiona E. Zeggini, Eleftheria Holt, Cathy Roberts, Sally |
author_facet | Mennan, Claire Hopkins, Timothy Channon, Alastair Elliott, Mark Johnstone, Brian Kadir, Timor Loughlin, John Peffers, Mandy Pitsillides, Andrew Sofat, Nidhi Stewart, Caroline Watt, Fiona E. Zeggini, Eleftheria Holt, Cathy Roberts, Sally |
author_sort | Mennan, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This UK-wide OATech Network + consensus study utilised a Delphi approach to discern levels of awareness across an expert panel regarding the role of existing and novel technologies in osteoarthritis research. To direct future cross-disciplinary research it aimed to identify which could be adopted to subcategorise patients with osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: An online questionnaire was formulated based on technologies which might aid OA research and subcategorisation. During a two-day face-to-face meeting concordance of expert opinion was established with surveys (23 questions) before, during and at the end of the meeting (Rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Experts spoke on current evidence for imaging, genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, biomarkers, activity monitoring, clinical engineering and machine learning relating to subcategorisation. For each round of voting, ≥80% votes led to consensus and ≤20% to exclusion of a statement. RESULTS: Panel members were unanimous that a combination of novel technological advances have potential to improve OA diagnostics and treatment through subcategorisation, agreeing in Rounds 1 and 2 that epigenetics, genetics, MRI, proteomics, wet biomarkers and machine learning could aid subcategorisation. Expert presentations changed participants’ opinions on the value of metabolomics, activity monitoring and clinical engineering, all reaching consensus in Round 2. X-rays lost consensus between Rounds 1 and 2; clinical X-rays reached consensus in Round 3. CONCLUSION: Consensus identified that 9 of the 11 technologies should be targeted towards OA subcategorisation to address existing OA research technology and knowledge gaps. These novel, rapidly evolving technologies are recommended as a focus for emergent, cross-disciplinary osteoarthritis research programmes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9718088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97180882022-12-05 The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach Mennan, Claire Hopkins, Timothy Channon, Alastair Elliott, Mark Johnstone, Brian Kadir, Timor Loughlin, John Peffers, Mandy Pitsillides, Andrew Sofat, Nidhi Stewart, Caroline Watt, Fiona E. Zeggini, Eleftheria Holt, Cathy Roberts, Sally Osteoarthr Cartil Open ORIGINAL PAPER OBJECTIVE: This UK-wide OATech Network + consensus study utilised a Delphi approach to discern levels of awareness across an expert panel regarding the role of existing and novel technologies in osteoarthritis research. To direct future cross-disciplinary research it aimed to identify which could be adopted to subcategorise patients with osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: An online questionnaire was formulated based on technologies which might aid OA research and subcategorisation. During a two-day face-to-face meeting concordance of expert opinion was established with surveys (23 questions) before, during and at the end of the meeting (Rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Experts spoke on current evidence for imaging, genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, biomarkers, activity monitoring, clinical engineering and machine learning relating to subcategorisation. For each round of voting, ≥80% votes led to consensus and ≤20% to exclusion of a statement. RESULTS: Panel members were unanimous that a combination of novel technological advances have potential to improve OA diagnostics and treatment through subcategorisation, agreeing in Rounds 1 and 2 that epigenetics, genetics, MRI, proteomics, wet biomarkers and machine learning could aid subcategorisation. Expert presentations changed participants’ opinions on the value of metabolomics, activity monitoring and clinical engineering, all reaching consensus in Round 2. X-rays lost consensus between Rounds 1 and 2; clinical X-rays reached consensus in Round 3. CONCLUSION: Consensus identified that 9 of the 11 technologies should be targeted towards OA subcategorisation to address existing OA research technology and knowledge gaps. These novel, rapidly evolving technologies are recommended as a focus for emergent, cross-disciplinary osteoarthritis research programmes. Elsevier 2020-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9718088/ /pubmed/36474678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100081 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL PAPER Mennan, Claire Hopkins, Timothy Channon, Alastair Elliott, Mark Johnstone, Brian Kadir, Timor Loughlin, John Peffers, Mandy Pitsillides, Andrew Sofat, Nidhi Stewart, Caroline Watt, Fiona E. Zeggini, Eleftheria Holt, Cathy Roberts, Sally The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach |
title | The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach |
title_full | The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach |
title_fullStr | The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach |
title_short | The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach |
title_sort | use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a delphi study approach |
topic | ORIGINAL PAPER |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100081 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mennanclaire theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT hopkinstimothy theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT channonalastair theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT elliottmark theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT johnstonebrian theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT kadirtimor theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT loughlinjohn theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT peffersmandy theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT pitsillidesandrew theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT sofatnidhi theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT stewartcaroline theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT wattfionae theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT zegginieleftheria theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT holtcathy theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT robertssally theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT theuseoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT mennanclaire useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT hopkinstimothy useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT channonalastair useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT elliottmark useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT johnstonebrian useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT kadirtimor useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT loughlinjohn useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT peffersmandy useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT pitsillidesandrew useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT sofatnidhi useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT stewartcaroline useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT wattfionae useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT zegginieleftheria useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT holtcathy useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT robertssally useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach AT useoftechnologyinthesubcategorisationofosteoarthritisadelphistudyapproach |