Cargando…

Reliability and concurrent validity of three-dimensional ultrasound for quantifying knee cartilage volume

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to test the reliability and validity of a handheld mechanical three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) device for quantifying femoral articular cartilage (FAC) against the current clinical standard of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DESIGN: Bilateral knee images...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papernick, S., Dima, R., Gillies, D.J., Appleton, C.T., Fenster, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100127
_version_ 1784843073758429184
author Papernick, S.
Dima, R.
Gillies, D.J.
Appleton, C.T.
Fenster, A.
author_facet Papernick, S.
Dima, R.
Gillies, D.J.
Appleton, C.T.
Fenster, A.
author_sort Papernick, S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to test the reliability and validity of a handheld mechanical three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) device for quantifying femoral articular cartilage (FAC) against the current clinical standard of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DESIGN: Bilateral knee images of 25 healthy volunteers were acquired with 3D US and 3.0 T MRI. The trochlear FAC was segmented by two raters who repeated segmentations on five cases during separate sessions. MRI and 3D US segmentations were registered using a semi-automated surface-based registration algorithm, and MRI segmentations were trimmed to match the FAC region from 3D US. Intra- (n = 5) and inter-rater (n = 25) reliabilities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) calculated from FAC volumes. Relationships between MRI and 3D US were assessed using Spearman correlation and linear regression (n = 25). RESULTS: MRI intra-rater ICCs were 0.97 (0.79, 1.00) and 0.90 (0.25, 0.99) for each rater with an inter-rater ICC of 0.83 (0.48, 0.94). 3D US intra-rater ICCs were 1.00 (0.98, 1.00) and 0.98 (0.84, 1.00) for each rater with an inter-rater ICC of 0.96 (0.90, 0.98). Spearman correlation and linear regression revealed a strong correlation ρ = 0.884 (0.746, 0.949) and regression R(2) = 0.848 (0.750, 0.950). CONCLUSION: These results suggest 3D US demonstrates excellent intra- and inter-rater reliabilities and strong concurrent validity with MRI when quantifying healthy trochlear FAC volume. 3D US may reduce imaging costs and greatly improve feasibility of quantifying knee cartilage volume during knee arthritis clinical trials and patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9718346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97183462022-12-05 Reliability and concurrent validity of three-dimensional ultrasound for quantifying knee cartilage volume Papernick, S. Dima, R. Gillies, D.J. Appleton, C.T. Fenster, A. Osteoarthr Cartil Open ORIGINAL PAPER OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to test the reliability and validity of a handheld mechanical three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) device for quantifying femoral articular cartilage (FAC) against the current clinical standard of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DESIGN: Bilateral knee images of 25 healthy volunteers were acquired with 3D US and 3.0 T MRI. The trochlear FAC was segmented by two raters who repeated segmentations on five cases during separate sessions. MRI and 3D US segmentations were registered using a semi-automated surface-based registration algorithm, and MRI segmentations were trimmed to match the FAC region from 3D US. Intra- (n = 5) and inter-rater (n = 25) reliabilities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) calculated from FAC volumes. Relationships between MRI and 3D US were assessed using Spearman correlation and linear regression (n = 25). RESULTS: MRI intra-rater ICCs were 0.97 (0.79, 1.00) and 0.90 (0.25, 0.99) for each rater with an inter-rater ICC of 0.83 (0.48, 0.94). 3D US intra-rater ICCs were 1.00 (0.98, 1.00) and 0.98 (0.84, 1.00) for each rater with an inter-rater ICC of 0.96 (0.90, 0.98). Spearman correlation and linear regression revealed a strong correlation ρ = 0.884 (0.746, 0.949) and regression R(2) = 0.848 (0.750, 0.950). CONCLUSION: These results suggest 3D US demonstrates excellent intra- and inter-rater reliabilities and strong concurrent validity with MRI when quantifying healthy trochlear FAC volume. 3D US may reduce imaging costs and greatly improve feasibility of quantifying knee cartilage volume during knee arthritis clinical trials and patient care. Elsevier 2020-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9718346/ /pubmed/36474884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100127 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle ORIGINAL PAPER
Papernick, S.
Dima, R.
Gillies, D.J.
Appleton, C.T.
Fenster, A.
Reliability and concurrent validity of three-dimensional ultrasound for quantifying knee cartilage volume
title Reliability and concurrent validity of three-dimensional ultrasound for quantifying knee cartilage volume
title_full Reliability and concurrent validity of three-dimensional ultrasound for quantifying knee cartilage volume
title_fullStr Reliability and concurrent validity of three-dimensional ultrasound for quantifying knee cartilage volume
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and concurrent validity of three-dimensional ultrasound for quantifying knee cartilage volume
title_short Reliability and concurrent validity of three-dimensional ultrasound for quantifying knee cartilage volume
title_sort reliability and concurrent validity of three-dimensional ultrasound for quantifying knee cartilage volume
topic ORIGINAL PAPER
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100127
work_keys_str_mv AT papernicks reliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofthreedimensionalultrasoundforquantifyingkneecartilagevolume
AT dimar reliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofthreedimensionalultrasoundforquantifyingkneecartilagevolume
AT gilliesdj reliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofthreedimensionalultrasoundforquantifyingkneecartilagevolume
AT appletonct reliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofthreedimensionalultrasoundforquantifyingkneecartilagevolume
AT fenstera reliabilityandconcurrentvalidityofthreedimensionalultrasoundforquantifyingkneecartilagevolume