Cargando…

Novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: No evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search

According to the attentional dwelling hypothesis, task-irrelevant abrupt-onset cues capture attention in a stimulus-driven way by eliciting spatial shifts and further dwelling at cue position until target onset. Consequently, search can be facilitated for targets at cued locations relative to uncued...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmid, Rebecca Rosa, Ansorge, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460927
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02623-y
_version_ 1784843119143944192
author Schmid, Rebecca Rosa
Ansorge, Ulrich
author_facet Schmid, Rebecca Rosa
Ansorge, Ulrich
author_sort Schmid, Rebecca Rosa
collection PubMed
description According to the attentional dwelling hypothesis, task-irrelevant abrupt-onset cues capture attention in a stimulus-driven way by eliciting spatial shifts and further dwelling at cue position until target onset. Consequently, search can be facilitated for targets at cued locations relative to uncued locations. Critically, effects of stimulus-driven capture can go undetected in mean reaction times and error rates when search is too easy. In contrast, according to the priority accumulation framework (PAF), cueing effects for task-irrelevant cues differ from cueing effects by task-relevant cues. Most critically, cueing effects by irrelevant cues do not necessarily index spatial shifts and more dwelling but rather retrieval of cueing information. We used both behavioral measures (i.e., cueing effects and distractor compatibility effects) and event-related potentials on direct visual orienting activity elicited by the cue (Experiment 2) as well as consequences on target processing (Experiment 1) to investigate whether task-irrelevant abrupt onsets elicited attention shifts and led to further dwelling. We found behavioral support for attentional effects of task-irrelevant cues, surprisingly, however, only when search displays remained on-screen until response. We found no support for the attentional dwelling hypothesis or for PAF in the size of cueing effects as a function of search difficulty. Critically, lateralized ERPs revealed that salience of abrupt onsets per se is not sufficient to elicit spatial shifts during color search. Finally, neurophysiological evidence demonstrates that choices toward the implementation of experimental protocols can dramatically alter behavioral results on attentional effects of salient, but task-irrelevant abrupt onsets and conclusions drawn from them. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-022-02623-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9718589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97185892022-12-05 Novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: No evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search Schmid, Rebecca Rosa Ansorge, Ulrich Atten Percept Psychophys Article According to the attentional dwelling hypothesis, task-irrelevant abrupt-onset cues capture attention in a stimulus-driven way by eliciting spatial shifts and further dwelling at cue position until target onset. Consequently, search can be facilitated for targets at cued locations relative to uncued locations. Critically, effects of stimulus-driven capture can go undetected in mean reaction times and error rates when search is too easy. In contrast, according to the priority accumulation framework (PAF), cueing effects for task-irrelevant cues differ from cueing effects by task-relevant cues. Most critically, cueing effects by irrelevant cues do not necessarily index spatial shifts and more dwelling but rather retrieval of cueing information. We used both behavioral measures (i.e., cueing effects and distractor compatibility effects) and event-related potentials on direct visual orienting activity elicited by the cue (Experiment 2) as well as consequences on target processing (Experiment 1) to investigate whether task-irrelevant abrupt onsets elicited attention shifts and led to further dwelling. We found behavioral support for attentional effects of task-irrelevant cues, surprisingly, however, only when search displays remained on-screen until response. We found no support for the attentional dwelling hypothesis or for PAF in the size of cueing effects as a function of search difficulty. Critically, lateralized ERPs revealed that salience of abrupt onsets per se is not sufficient to elicit spatial shifts during color search. Finally, neurophysiological evidence demonstrates that choices toward the implementation of experimental protocols can dramatically alter behavioral results on attentional effects of salient, but task-irrelevant abrupt onsets and conclusions drawn from them. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-022-02623-y. Springer US 2022-12-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9718589/ /pubmed/36460927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02623-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Schmid, Rebecca Rosa
Ansorge, Ulrich
Novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: No evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search
title Novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: No evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search
title_full Novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: No evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search
title_fullStr Novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: No evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search
title_full_unstemmed Novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: No evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search
title_short Novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: No evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search
title_sort novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: no evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460927
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02623-y
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidrebeccarosa noveltestsofcapturebyirrelevantabruptonsetsnoevidenceforamediatingroleofsearchtaskdifficultyduringcolorsearch
AT ansorgeulrich noveltestsofcapturebyirrelevantabruptonsetsnoevidenceforamediatingroleofsearchtaskdifficultyduringcolorsearch