Cargando…

Evaluation of in vivo staging of amyloid deposition in cognitively unimpaired elderly aged 78–94

Amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition is common in cognitively unimpaired (CU) elderly >85 years. This study investigated amyloid distribution and evaluated three published in vivo amyloid-PET staging schemes from a cognitively unimpaired (CU) cohort aged 84.9 ± 4.3 years (n = 75). SUV-based principal com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michalowska, Malgorzata M., Herholz, Karl, Hinz, Rainer, Amadi, Chinenye, McInnes, Lynn, Anton-Rodriguez, Jose M., Karikari, Thomas K., Blennow, Kaj, Zetterberg, Henrik, Ashton, Nicholas J., Pendleton, Neil, Carter, Stephen F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01685-6
_version_ 1784843139007119360
author Michalowska, Malgorzata M.
Herholz, Karl
Hinz, Rainer
Amadi, Chinenye
McInnes, Lynn
Anton-Rodriguez, Jose M.
Karikari, Thomas K.
Blennow, Kaj
Zetterberg, Henrik
Ashton, Nicholas J.
Pendleton, Neil
Carter, Stephen F.
author_facet Michalowska, Malgorzata M.
Herholz, Karl
Hinz, Rainer
Amadi, Chinenye
McInnes, Lynn
Anton-Rodriguez, Jose M.
Karikari, Thomas K.
Blennow, Kaj
Zetterberg, Henrik
Ashton, Nicholas J.
Pendleton, Neil
Carter, Stephen F.
author_sort Michalowska, Malgorzata M.
collection PubMed
description Amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition is common in cognitively unimpaired (CU) elderly >85 years. This study investigated amyloid distribution and evaluated three published in vivo amyloid-PET staging schemes from a cognitively unimpaired (CU) cohort aged 84.9 ± 4.3 years (n = 75). SUV-based principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to (18)F-flutemetamol PET data to determine an unbiased regional covariance pattern of tracer uptake across grey matter regions. PET staging schemes were applied to the data and compared to the PCA output. Concentration of p-tau181 was measured in blood plasma. The PCA revealed three distinct components accounting for 91.2% of total SUV variance. PC1 driven by the large common variance of uptake in neocortical and striatal regions was significantly positively correlated with global SUVRs, APOE4 status and p-tau181 concentration. PC2 represented mainly non-specific uptake in typical amyloid-PET reference regions, and PC3 the occipital lobe. Application of the staging schemes demonstrated that the majority of the CU cohort (up to 93%) were classified as having pathological amount and distribution of Aβ. Good correspondence existed between binary (+/−) classification and later amyloid stages, however, substantial differences existed between schemes for low stages with 8–17% of individuals being unstageable, i.e., not following the sequential progression of Aβ deposition. In spite of the difference in staging outcomes there was broad spatial overlap between earlier stages and PC1, most prominently in default mode network regions. This study critically evaluated the utility of in vivo amyloid staging from a single PET scan in CU elderly and found that early amyloid stages could not be consistently classified. The majority of the cohort had pathological Aβ, thus, it remains an open topic what constitutes abnormal brain Aβ in the oldest-old and what is the best method to determine that.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9718666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97186662022-12-04 Evaluation of in vivo staging of amyloid deposition in cognitively unimpaired elderly aged 78–94 Michalowska, Malgorzata M. Herholz, Karl Hinz, Rainer Amadi, Chinenye McInnes, Lynn Anton-Rodriguez, Jose M. Karikari, Thomas K. Blennow, Kaj Zetterberg, Henrik Ashton, Nicholas J. Pendleton, Neil Carter, Stephen F. Mol Psychiatry Article Amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition is common in cognitively unimpaired (CU) elderly >85 years. This study investigated amyloid distribution and evaluated three published in vivo amyloid-PET staging schemes from a cognitively unimpaired (CU) cohort aged 84.9 ± 4.3 years (n = 75). SUV-based principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to (18)F-flutemetamol PET data to determine an unbiased regional covariance pattern of tracer uptake across grey matter regions. PET staging schemes were applied to the data and compared to the PCA output. Concentration of p-tau181 was measured in blood plasma. The PCA revealed three distinct components accounting for 91.2% of total SUV variance. PC1 driven by the large common variance of uptake in neocortical and striatal regions was significantly positively correlated with global SUVRs, APOE4 status and p-tau181 concentration. PC2 represented mainly non-specific uptake in typical amyloid-PET reference regions, and PC3 the occipital lobe. Application of the staging schemes demonstrated that the majority of the CU cohort (up to 93%) were classified as having pathological amount and distribution of Aβ. Good correspondence existed between binary (+/−) classification and later amyloid stages, however, substantial differences existed between schemes for low stages with 8–17% of individuals being unstageable, i.e., not following the sequential progression of Aβ deposition. In spite of the difference in staging outcomes there was broad spatial overlap between earlier stages and PC1, most prominently in default mode network regions. This study critically evaluated the utility of in vivo amyloid staging from a single PET scan in CU elderly and found that early amyloid stages could not be consistently classified. The majority of the cohort had pathological Aβ, thus, it remains an open topic what constitutes abnormal brain Aβ in the oldest-old and what is the best method to determine that. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9718666/ /pubmed/35858992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01685-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Michalowska, Malgorzata M.
Herholz, Karl
Hinz, Rainer
Amadi, Chinenye
McInnes, Lynn
Anton-Rodriguez, Jose M.
Karikari, Thomas K.
Blennow, Kaj
Zetterberg, Henrik
Ashton, Nicholas J.
Pendleton, Neil
Carter, Stephen F.
Evaluation of in vivo staging of amyloid deposition in cognitively unimpaired elderly aged 78–94
title Evaluation of in vivo staging of amyloid deposition in cognitively unimpaired elderly aged 78–94
title_full Evaluation of in vivo staging of amyloid deposition in cognitively unimpaired elderly aged 78–94
title_fullStr Evaluation of in vivo staging of amyloid deposition in cognitively unimpaired elderly aged 78–94
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of in vivo staging of amyloid deposition in cognitively unimpaired elderly aged 78–94
title_short Evaluation of in vivo staging of amyloid deposition in cognitively unimpaired elderly aged 78–94
title_sort evaluation of in vivo staging of amyloid deposition in cognitively unimpaired elderly aged 78–94
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01685-6
work_keys_str_mv AT michalowskamalgorzatam evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894
AT herholzkarl evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894
AT hinzrainer evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894
AT amadichinenye evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894
AT mcinneslynn evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894
AT antonrodriguezjosem evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894
AT karikarithomask evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894
AT blennowkaj evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894
AT zetterberghenrik evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894
AT ashtonnicholasj evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894
AT pendletonneil evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894
AT carterstephenf evaluationofinvivostagingofamyloiddepositionincognitivelyunimpairedelderlyaged7894