Cargando…
The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Meniscal pathologies are common knee injuries and arthroscopic surgery is the current accepted gold standard for treatment. However, there is evidence to support the use of the Mulligan Concept (MC) Mobilization with Movement (MWM) for meniscal pathologies including the ‘Squeeze’ techniq...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
NASMI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518834 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.55540 |
_version_ | 1784843153639997440 |
---|---|
author | Reep, Nathan C. Leverett, Sydney N. Heywood, Rebecca M. Baker, Russell T. Barnes, Darren L. Cheatham, Scott W. |
author_facet | Reep, Nathan C. Leverett, Sydney N. Heywood, Rebecca M. Baker, Russell T. Barnes, Darren L. Cheatham, Scott W. |
author_sort | Reep, Nathan C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Meniscal pathologies are common knee injuries and arthroscopic surgery is the current accepted gold standard for treatment. However, there is evidence to support the use of the Mulligan Concept (MC) Mobilization with Movement (MWM) for meniscal pathologies including the ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial internal rotation (IR), and tibial external rotation (ER). HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature to investigate the effectiveness of MC MWMs for meniscal lesions on patient reported pain, function, and multi-dimensional health status in patients with clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review METHODS: A literature search was completed across multiple databases using combinations of the words “knee, function, mobilization with movement, MWM, mulligan concept, MC, meniscal pathology, meniscal derangement, and meniscal tear.” Studies written within the prior 10 years that examined MC MWM techniques to treat knee meniscal injury were included. Articles that met the inclusion criteria (used MC MWM ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial IR, or tibial ER for treatment of clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies; Patient reported outcome [PRO] measures had to be used in the assessment of knee pain or function) were analyzed for quality. Randomized control trials were analyzed using the PEDro scale and the Downs & Black (D&B) checklist, case series were analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist, and case reports were analyzed using the CARES checklist. RESULTS: Six articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, two randomized controlled studies, two case series, and two case reports consisting of 72 subjects. All six papers included reports of improvements in pain and function that were either statistically significant or met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Five studies reported the Disablement in the Physically Active (DPA) scale that also demonstrated statistically significant differences or met the MCID. The MC MWM ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial IR, or tibial ER demonstrated the ability to reduce pain, improve function, and improve patient perceived disability following treatment of a clinically diagnosed meniscal pathology. These studies demonstrated short term results lasting from one week to 21 weeks. CONCLUSION: Treatment interventions incorporating MC MWM techniques demonstrated reduction of pain and improvement in function in the short term in patients with clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9718724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | NASMI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97187242022-12-13 The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review Reep, Nathan C. Leverett, Sydney N. Heywood, Rebecca M. Baker, Russell T. Barnes, Darren L. Cheatham, Scott W. Int J Sports Phys Ther Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Meniscal pathologies are common knee injuries and arthroscopic surgery is the current accepted gold standard for treatment. However, there is evidence to support the use of the Mulligan Concept (MC) Mobilization with Movement (MWM) for meniscal pathologies including the ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial internal rotation (IR), and tibial external rotation (ER). HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature to investigate the effectiveness of MC MWMs for meniscal lesions on patient reported pain, function, and multi-dimensional health status in patients with clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review METHODS: A literature search was completed across multiple databases using combinations of the words “knee, function, mobilization with movement, MWM, mulligan concept, MC, meniscal pathology, meniscal derangement, and meniscal tear.” Studies written within the prior 10 years that examined MC MWM techniques to treat knee meniscal injury were included. Articles that met the inclusion criteria (used MC MWM ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial IR, or tibial ER for treatment of clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies; Patient reported outcome [PRO] measures had to be used in the assessment of knee pain or function) were analyzed for quality. Randomized control trials were analyzed using the PEDro scale and the Downs & Black (D&B) checklist, case series were analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist, and case reports were analyzed using the CARES checklist. RESULTS: Six articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, two randomized controlled studies, two case series, and two case reports consisting of 72 subjects. All six papers included reports of improvements in pain and function that were either statistically significant or met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Five studies reported the Disablement in the Physically Active (DPA) scale that also demonstrated statistically significant differences or met the MCID. The MC MWM ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial IR, or tibial ER demonstrated the ability to reduce pain, improve function, and improve patient perceived disability following treatment of a clinically diagnosed meniscal pathology. These studies demonstrated short term results lasting from one week to 21 weeks. CONCLUSION: Treatment interventions incorporating MC MWM techniques demonstrated reduction of pain and improvement in function in the short term in patients with clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a NASMI 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9718724/ /pubmed/36518834 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.55540 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis Reep, Nathan C. Leverett, Sydney N. Heywood, Rebecca M. Baker, Russell T. Barnes, Darren L. Cheatham, Scott W. The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review |
title | The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | efficacy of the mulligan concept to treat meniscal pathology: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518834 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.55540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reepnathanc theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview AT leverettsydneyn theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview AT heywoodrebeccam theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview AT bakerrussellt theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview AT barnesdarrenl theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview AT cheathamscottw theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview AT reepnathanc efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview AT leverettsydneyn efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview AT heywoodrebeccam efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview AT bakerrussellt efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview AT barnesdarrenl efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview AT cheathamscottw efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview |