Cargando…

The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Meniscal pathologies are common knee injuries and arthroscopic surgery is the current accepted gold standard for treatment. However, there is evidence to support the use of the Mulligan Concept (MC) Mobilization with Movement (MWM) for meniscal pathologies including the ‘Squeeze’ techniq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reep, Nathan C., Leverett, Sydney N., Heywood, Rebecca M., Baker, Russell T., Barnes, Darren L., Cheatham, Scott W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: NASMI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518834
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.55540
_version_ 1784843153639997440
author Reep, Nathan C.
Leverett, Sydney N.
Heywood, Rebecca M.
Baker, Russell T.
Barnes, Darren L.
Cheatham, Scott W.
author_facet Reep, Nathan C.
Leverett, Sydney N.
Heywood, Rebecca M.
Baker, Russell T.
Barnes, Darren L.
Cheatham, Scott W.
author_sort Reep, Nathan C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Meniscal pathologies are common knee injuries and arthroscopic surgery is the current accepted gold standard for treatment. However, there is evidence to support the use of the Mulligan Concept (MC) Mobilization with Movement (MWM) for meniscal pathologies including the ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial internal rotation (IR), and tibial external rotation (ER). HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature to investigate the effectiveness of MC MWMs for meniscal lesions on patient reported pain, function, and multi-dimensional health status in patients with clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review METHODS: A literature search was completed across multiple databases using combinations of the words “knee, function, mobilization with movement, MWM, mulligan concept, MC, meniscal pathology, meniscal derangement, and meniscal tear.” Studies written within the prior 10 years that examined MC MWM techniques to treat knee meniscal injury were included. Articles that met the inclusion criteria (used MC MWM ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial IR, or tibial ER for treatment of clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies; Patient reported outcome [PRO] measures had to be used in the assessment of knee pain or function) were analyzed for quality. Randomized control trials were analyzed using the PEDro scale and the Downs & Black (D&B) checklist, case series were analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist, and case reports were analyzed using the CARES checklist. RESULTS: Six articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, two randomized controlled studies, two case series, and two case reports consisting of 72 subjects. All six papers included reports of improvements in pain and function that were either statistically significant or met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Five studies reported the Disablement in the Physically Active (DPA) scale that also demonstrated statistically significant differences or met the MCID. The MC MWM ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial IR, or tibial ER demonstrated the ability to reduce pain, improve function, and improve patient perceived disability following treatment of a clinically diagnosed meniscal pathology. These studies demonstrated short term results lasting from one week to 21 weeks. CONCLUSION: Treatment interventions incorporating MC MWM techniques demonstrated reduction of pain and improvement in function in the short term in patients with clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9718724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher NASMI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97187242022-12-13 The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review Reep, Nathan C. Leverett, Sydney N. Heywood, Rebecca M. Baker, Russell T. Barnes, Darren L. Cheatham, Scott W. Int J Sports Phys Ther Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Meniscal pathologies are common knee injuries and arthroscopic surgery is the current accepted gold standard for treatment. However, there is evidence to support the use of the Mulligan Concept (MC) Mobilization with Movement (MWM) for meniscal pathologies including the ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial internal rotation (IR), and tibial external rotation (ER). HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature to investigate the effectiveness of MC MWMs for meniscal lesions on patient reported pain, function, and multi-dimensional health status in patients with clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review METHODS: A literature search was completed across multiple databases using combinations of the words “knee, function, mobilization with movement, MWM, mulligan concept, MC, meniscal pathology, meniscal derangement, and meniscal tear.” Studies written within the prior 10 years that examined MC MWM techniques to treat knee meniscal injury were included. Articles that met the inclusion criteria (used MC MWM ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial IR, or tibial ER for treatment of clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies; Patient reported outcome [PRO] measures had to be used in the assessment of knee pain or function) were analyzed for quality. Randomized control trials were analyzed using the PEDro scale and the Downs & Black (D&B) checklist, case series were analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist, and case reports were analyzed using the CARES checklist. RESULTS: Six articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, two randomized controlled studies, two case series, and two case reports consisting of 72 subjects. All six papers included reports of improvements in pain and function that were either statistically significant or met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Five studies reported the Disablement in the Physically Active (DPA) scale that also demonstrated statistically significant differences or met the MCID. The MC MWM ‘Squeeze’ technique, tibial IR, or tibial ER demonstrated the ability to reduce pain, improve function, and improve patient perceived disability following treatment of a clinically diagnosed meniscal pathology. These studies demonstrated short term results lasting from one week to 21 weeks. CONCLUSION: Treatment interventions incorporating MC MWM techniques demonstrated reduction of pain and improvement in function in the short term in patients with clinically diagnosed meniscal pathologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a NASMI 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9718724/ /pubmed/36518834 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.55540 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis
Reep, Nathan C.
Leverett, Sydney N.
Heywood, Rebecca M.
Baker, Russell T.
Barnes, Darren L.
Cheatham, Scott W.
The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review
title The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review
title_full The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review
title_short The Efficacy of the Mulligan Concept to Treat Meniscal Pathology: A Systematic Review
title_sort efficacy of the mulligan concept to treat meniscal pathology: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518834
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.55540
work_keys_str_mv AT reepnathanc theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview
AT leverettsydneyn theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview
AT heywoodrebeccam theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview
AT bakerrussellt theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview
AT barnesdarrenl theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview
AT cheathamscottw theefficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview
AT reepnathanc efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview
AT leverettsydneyn efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview
AT heywoodrebeccam efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview
AT bakerrussellt efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview
AT barnesdarrenl efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview
AT cheathamscottw efficacyofthemulliganconcepttotreatmeniscalpathologyasystematicreview