Cargando…

Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children

BACKGROUND: Medicines designed for adults may be inappropriate for use in children in terms of strength, dosage form and/or excipient content. There is currently no standardised method of assessing the age-appropriateness of a medicine for paediatric use. AIM: To develop and test a tool to assess wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duncan, Jennifer C., Bracken, Louise E., Nunn, Anthony J., Peak, Matthew, Turner, Mark A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36208398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01478-5
_version_ 1784843192602984448
author Duncan, Jennifer C.
Bracken, Louise E.
Nunn, Anthony J.
Peak, Matthew
Turner, Mark A.
author_facet Duncan, Jennifer C.
Bracken, Louise E.
Nunn, Anthony J.
Peak, Matthew
Turner, Mark A.
author_sort Duncan, Jennifer C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medicines designed for adults may be inappropriate for use in children in terms of strength, dosage form and/or excipient content. There is currently no standardised method of assessing the age-appropriateness of a medicine for paediatric use. AIM: To develop and test a tool to assess whether a dosage form (formulation) is appropriate for children and estimate the proportion of formulations considered ‘inappropriate’ in a cohort of hospitalised paediatric patients with a chronic illness. METHOD: A multi-phase study: patient data collection, tool development, case assessments and tool validation. Inpatients aged 0–17 years at two UK paediatric/neonatal hospitals during data collection periods between January 2015 and March 2016. Written informed consent/assent was obtained. Medicines assessed were new or regularly prescribed to inpatients as part of their routine clinical care. All medicine administration episodes recorded were assessed using the Age-appropriate Formulation tool. The tool was developed by a consensus approach, as a one-page flowchart. Independent case assessments were evaluated in 2019. RESULTS: In 427 eligible children; 2,199 medicine administration episodes were recorded. Two assessors reviewed 220 episodes in parallel: percentage exact agreement was found to be 91.7% (99/108) and 93.1% (95/102). In total, 259/2,199 (11.8%) medicine administration episodes involved a dosage form categorised as ‘age-inappropriate’. CONCLUSION: A novel tool has been developed and internally validated. The tool can identify which medicines would benefit from development of an improved paediatric formulation. It has shown high inter-rater reliability between users. External validation is needed to further assess the tool’s utility in different settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01478-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9718882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97188822022-12-04 Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children Duncan, Jennifer C. Bracken, Louise E. Nunn, Anthony J. Peak, Matthew Turner, Mark A. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article BACKGROUND: Medicines designed for adults may be inappropriate for use in children in terms of strength, dosage form and/or excipient content. There is currently no standardised method of assessing the age-appropriateness of a medicine for paediatric use. AIM: To develop and test a tool to assess whether a dosage form (formulation) is appropriate for children and estimate the proportion of formulations considered ‘inappropriate’ in a cohort of hospitalised paediatric patients with a chronic illness. METHOD: A multi-phase study: patient data collection, tool development, case assessments and tool validation. Inpatients aged 0–17 years at two UK paediatric/neonatal hospitals during data collection periods between January 2015 and March 2016. Written informed consent/assent was obtained. Medicines assessed were new or regularly prescribed to inpatients as part of their routine clinical care. All medicine administration episodes recorded were assessed using the Age-appropriate Formulation tool. The tool was developed by a consensus approach, as a one-page flowchart. Independent case assessments were evaluated in 2019. RESULTS: In 427 eligible children; 2,199 medicine administration episodes were recorded. Two assessors reviewed 220 episodes in parallel: percentage exact agreement was found to be 91.7% (99/108) and 93.1% (95/102). In total, 259/2,199 (11.8%) medicine administration episodes involved a dosage form categorised as ‘age-inappropriate’. CONCLUSION: A novel tool has been developed and internally validated. The tool can identify which medicines would benefit from development of an improved paediatric formulation. It has shown high inter-rater reliability between users. External validation is needed to further assess the tool’s utility in different settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01478-5. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9718882/ /pubmed/36208398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01478-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Duncan, Jennifer C.
Bracken, Louise E.
Nunn, Anthony J.
Peak, Matthew
Turner, Mark A.
Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children
title Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children
title_full Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children
title_short Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children
title_sort development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36208398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01478-5
work_keys_str_mv AT duncanjenniferc developmentandevaluationofanassessmentoftheageappropriatenessinappropriatenessofformulationsusedinchildren
AT brackenlouisee developmentandevaluationofanassessmentoftheageappropriatenessinappropriatenessofformulationsusedinchildren
AT nunnanthonyj developmentandevaluationofanassessmentoftheageappropriatenessinappropriatenessofformulationsusedinchildren
AT peakmatthew developmentandevaluationofanassessmentoftheageappropriatenessinappropriatenessofformulationsusedinchildren
AT turnermarka developmentandevaluationofanassessmentoftheageappropriatenessinappropriatenessofformulationsusedinchildren