Cargando…
Comparable rates of secondary surgery between anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of secondary surgery following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with suture tape augmentation in comparison to conventional hamstring ACL reconstruction. We hypothesised that there would be no differences between the groups. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36459283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00549-w |
_version_ | 1784843195110129664 |
---|---|
author | Hopper, G. P. Wilson, W. T. O’Donnell, L. Hamilton, C. Blyth, M. J. G. MacKay, G. M. |
author_facet | Hopper, G. P. Wilson, W. T. O’Donnell, L. Hamilton, C. Blyth, M. J. G. MacKay, G. M. |
author_sort | Hopper, G. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of secondary surgery following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with suture tape augmentation in comparison to conventional hamstring ACL reconstruction. We hypothesised that there would be no differences between the groups. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparison study of patients undergoing ACL surgery between September 2011 and April 2018. Two hundred and 73 patients underwent ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. During the same timeframe, 137 patients with an acute proximal ACL rupture underwent ACL repair with suture tape augmentation. One patient was lost to follow-up in the ACL reconstruction group leaving 272 patients (99.6%) for the final analysis. In the ACL repair group, three patients were lost to follow-up leaving 134 patents (97.8%) for the final analysis. Secondary surgery was identified by contacting the patients by email/telephone and reviewing patient notes at the time of this analysis. RESULTS: Re-rupture occurred in 32 patients (11.8%) in the ACL reconstruction group compared to 22 patients (16.4%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.194). Contralateral ACL rupture occurred in four patients (1.5%) in the ACL reconstruction group compared to three patients (2.2%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.224). In the ACL reconstruction group, nine patients (3.3%) required secondary meniscal surgery whilst five patients (3.7%) required meniscal surgery in the ACL repair group (p = 0.830). Seven other operations were performed in the ACL reconstruction group (2.6%) compared to three other operations in the ACL repair group (2.2%) (p = 0.374). The overall number of patients undergoing secondary surgery in the ACL reconstruction group was 52 (19.1%) in comparison to 30 (22.4%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.114). CONCLUSION: ACL repair with suture tape augmentation for acute proximal ruptures demonstrated comparable rates of secondary surgery with hamstring ACL reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9718902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97189022022-12-04 Comparable rates of secondary surgery between anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Hopper, G. P. Wilson, W. T. O’Donnell, L. Hamilton, C. Blyth, M. J. G. MacKay, G. M. J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of secondary surgery following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with suture tape augmentation in comparison to conventional hamstring ACL reconstruction. We hypothesised that there would be no differences between the groups. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparison study of patients undergoing ACL surgery between September 2011 and April 2018. Two hundred and 73 patients underwent ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. During the same timeframe, 137 patients with an acute proximal ACL rupture underwent ACL repair with suture tape augmentation. One patient was lost to follow-up in the ACL reconstruction group leaving 272 patients (99.6%) for the final analysis. In the ACL repair group, three patients were lost to follow-up leaving 134 patents (97.8%) for the final analysis. Secondary surgery was identified by contacting the patients by email/telephone and reviewing patient notes at the time of this analysis. RESULTS: Re-rupture occurred in 32 patients (11.8%) in the ACL reconstruction group compared to 22 patients (16.4%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.194). Contralateral ACL rupture occurred in four patients (1.5%) in the ACL reconstruction group compared to three patients (2.2%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.224). In the ACL reconstruction group, nine patients (3.3%) required secondary meniscal surgery whilst five patients (3.7%) required meniscal surgery in the ACL repair group (p = 0.830). Seven other operations were performed in the ACL reconstruction group (2.6%) compared to three other operations in the ACL repair group (2.2%) (p = 0.374). The overall number of patients undergoing secondary surgery in the ACL reconstruction group was 52 (19.1%) in comparison to 30 (22.4%) in the ACL repair group (p = 0.114). CONCLUSION: ACL repair with suture tape augmentation for acute proximal ruptures demonstrated comparable rates of secondary surgery with hamstring ACL reconstruction. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9718902/ /pubmed/36459283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00549-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Hopper, G. P. Wilson, W. T. O’Donnell, L. Hamilton, C. Blyth, M. J. G. MacKay, G. M. Comparable rates of secondary surgery between anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title | Comparable rates of secondary surgery between anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title_full | Comparable rates of secondary surgery between anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Comparable rates of secondary surgery between anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparable rates of secondary surgery between anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title_short | Comparable rates of secondary surgery between anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title_sort | comparable rates of secondary surgery between anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36459283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00549-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoppergp comparableratesofsecondarysurgerybetweenanteriorcruciateligamentrepairwithsuturetapeaugmentationandanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT wilsonwt comparableratesofsecondarysurgerybetweenanteriorcruciateligamentrepairwithsuturetapeaugmentationandanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT odonnelll comparableratesofsecondarysurgerybetweenanteriorcruciateligamentrepairwithsuturetapeaugmentationandanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT hamiltonc comparableratesofsecondarysurgerybetweenanteriorcruciateligamentrepairwithsuturetapeaugmentationandanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT blythmjg comparableratesofsecondarysurgerybetweenanteriorcruciateligamentrepairwithsuturetapeaugmentationandanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT mackaygm comparableratesofsecondarysurgerybetweenanteriorcruciateligamentrepairwithsuturetapeaugmentationandanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction |