Cargando…

A comparative study of bone union and nonunion during distraction osteogenesis

BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics of bone nonunion during distraction osteogenesis (DO) were rarely discussed. This study was employed to specify the difference between bone union and nonunion during DO. METHODS: The patients with bone lengthening were recruited in our study. The bone union c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Qi, Liu, Ze, Guo, Hongbin, Wang, Min, Liang, Jieyu, Zhang, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06034-w
_version_ 1784843261925392384
author Liu, Qi
Liu, Ze
Guo, Hongbin
Wang, Min
Liang, Jieyu
Zhang, Yi
author_facet Liu, Qi
Liu, Ze
Guo, Hongbin
Wang, Min
Liang, Jieyu
Zhang, Yi
author_sort Liu, Qi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics of bone nonunion during distraction osteogenesis (DO) were rarely discussed. This study was employed to specify the difference between bone union and nonunion during DO. METHODS: The patients with bone lengthening were recruited in our study. The bone union cases indicated the ones that remove the external fixator successfully, whereas the bone nonunion represented the bridging callus did not appear even after 9 months (an absence of bridging callus for at least three out of four cortices on plain radiographs) that needs autogenous bone transplantation. The differences in the pixel value ratio (PVR) growth of regenerated callus, lengthening index (LI), healing index (HI), external fixation index (EFI) and blood biochemical indexes between bone union and nonunion were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 8 bone nonunion and 27 bone union subjects were included in this study. The PVR growth in bone nonunion was significantly lower than that in bone union (0.19 ± 0.06 vs. 0.32 ± 0.16, P = 0.048). Interestingly, the HI and EFI in bone nonunion was significantly higher than that in bone union (62.0 ± 31.4 vs. 37.0 ± 27.4, P = 0.036; 75.0 ± 30.9 vs. 49.9 ± 16.1, P = 0.006). However, no significant difference with regard to LI was identified (0.76 ± 0.52 vs. 0.77 ± 0.32, P = 0.976). Moreover, the circulating level of urea and lymphocyte count in bone union was significantly lower than that in bone nonunion (4.31 ± 1.05 vs. 5.17 ± 1.06, P = 0.049; 2.08 ± 0.67 vs. 2.73 ± 0.54, P = 0.018). On the contrary, the circulating level of magnesium in bone union was significantly higher than that in bone nonunion (0.87 ± 0.07 vs. 0.80 ± 0.07, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Compared to the bone union, the PVR growth was significantly lower, whereas the HI and EFI was significantly higher in the bone nonunion. Moreover, the circulating level of urea, magnesium and lymphocyte count was also different between these two. Therefore, the PVR, HI and EFI seems to be reliable and sensitive indicators to reflect the bone nonunion during DO, which might be considered in bone lengthening. Further prospective studies are still needed to elaborate the concerned issues. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-06034-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9719176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97191762022-12-04 A comparative study of bone union and nonunion during distraction osteogenesis Liu, Qi Liu, Ze Guo, Hongbin Wang, Min Liang, Jieyu Zhang, Yi BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics of bone nonunion during distraction osteogenesis (DO) were rarely discussed. This study was employed to specify the difference between bone union and nonunion during DO. METHODS: The patients with bone lengthening were recruited in our study. The bone union cases indicated the ones that remove the external fixator successfully, whereas the bone nonunion represented the bridging callus did not appear even after 9 months (an absence of bridging callus for at least three out of four cortices on plain radiographs) that needs autogenous bone transplantation. The differences in the pixel value ratio (PVR) growth of regenerated callus, lengthening index (LI), healing index (HI), external fixation index (EFI) and blood biochemical indexes between bone union and nonunion were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 8 bone nonunion and 27 bone union subjects were included in this study. The PVR growth in bone nonunion was significantly lower than that in bone union (0.19 ± 0.06 vs. 0.32 ± 0.16, P = 0.048). Interestingly, the HI and EFI in bone nonunion was significantly higher than that in bone union (62.0 ± 31.4 vs. 37.0 ± 27.4, P = 0.036; 75.0 ± 30.9 vs. 49.9 ± 16.1, P = 0.006). However, no significant difference with regard to LI was identified (0.76 ± 0.52 vs. 0.77 ± 0.32, P = 0.976). Moreover, the circulating level of urea and lymphocyte count in bone union was significantly lower than that in bone nonunion (4.31 ± 1.05 vs. 5.17 ± 1.06, P = 0.049; 2.08 ± 0.67 vs. 2.73 ± 0.54, P = 0.018). On the contrary, the circulating level of magnesium in bone union was significantly higher than that in bone nonunion (0.87 ± 0.07 vs. 0.80 ± 0.07, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Compared to the bone union, the PVR growth was significantly lower, whereas the HI and EFI was significantly higher in the bone nonunion. Moreover, the circulating level of urea, magnesium and lymphocyte count was also different between these two. Therefore, the PVR, HI and EFI seems to be reliable and sensitive indicators to reflect the bone nonunion during DO, which might be considered in bone lengthening. Further prospective studies are still needed to elaborate the concerned issues. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-06034-w. BioMed Central 2022-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9719176/ /pubmed/36461051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06034-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Qi
Liu, Ze
Guo, Hongbin
Wang, Min
Liang, Jieyu
Zhang, Yi
A comparative study of bone union and nonunion during distraction osteogenesis
title A comparative study of bone union and nonunion during distraction osteogenesis
title_full A comparative study of bone union and nonunion during distraction osteogenesis
title_fullStr A comparative study of bone union and nonunion during distraction osteogenesis
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of bone union and nonunion during distraction osteogenesis
title_short A comparative study of bone union and nonunion during distraction osteogenesis
title_sort comparative study of bone union and nonunion during distraction osteogenesis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06034-w
work_keys_str_mv AT liuqi acomparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis
AT liuze acomparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis
AT guohongbin acomparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis
AT wangmin acomparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis
AT liangjieyu acomparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis
AT zhangyi acomparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis
AT liuqi comparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis
AT liuze comparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis
AT guohongbin comparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis
AT wangmin comparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis
AT liangjieyu comparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis
AT zhangyi comparativestudyofboneunionandnonunionduringdistractionosteogenesis