Cargando…

NQPC-21 QOL EVALUATION IN THE TREATMENT COURSE OF CNS LYMPHOMA

BACKGROUND: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is the second common primary malignant brain tumor. Compared to glioma, the treatment period is often longer, but there have been few research reports on QOL evaluation during the treatment yet. In this study, we retrospectively examined th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamagishi, Yuki, Hanayama, Naomi, Sasaki, Nobuyoshi, Saito, Kuniaki, Kobayashi, Keiichi, Nakatomi, Hirofumi, Shiokawa, Yoshiaki, Nagane, Motoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719293/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac167.077
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is the second common primary malignant brain tumor. Compared to glioma, the treatment period is often longer, but there have been few research reports on QOL evaluation during the treatment yet. In this study, we retrospectively examined the QOL scores obtained during and following treatment of PCNSL to determine the association between changes in the QOL score and response to treatment, with particular interest in the issue in the evaluation over time. METHODS: Patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL who were treated and evaluated for QOL by EORTC QLQ-C30/BN-20 at our facility since April 2016 were included. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included, with a median age of 69, and a male to female ratio of 41:32. The median KPS was 70, and the median MMSE score was 29 points, indicating that a majority of the patients who could undergo the testing retained adequate cognitive function. There were 38 patients (55.1%) who maintained CR during the QOL evaluation period, and their QOL function scores tended to be maintained above the baseline. In contrast, 31 patients (44.9%) who relapsed during the QOL evaluation period showed a tendency to decline in global health at the time of recurrence or evaluation immediately before recurrence, with the worsened symptom score reflecting the localization of recurrence. Any associations of changes in QOL score with therapeutic methods were identified. Changes in QOL scores were rather frequently observed with exacerbation of comorbidities, perhaps due to a high incidence of PCNSL in the elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: EORTC QLQ-C30/BN-20 enabled QOL evaluation that might reflect treatment effect in PCNSL. The reporting rate to the questionnaire was low in patients with substantial brain dysfunction, and QOL evaluation may also be affected by comorbidities. Further investigation of influencing factors on QOL evaluation is warranted.