Cargando…

Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and risk factors for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen failure in critically-ill patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNC) may be an attractive first-line ventilatory support in COVID-19 patients. However, HNFC use for the management of COVID-19 patients and risk factors for HFNC failure remain to be determined. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included all conse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ait Hamou, Zakaria, Levy, Nathan, Charpentier, Julien, Mira, Jean-Paul, Jamme, Matthieu, Jozwiak, Mathieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02231-2
_version_ 1784843369342566400
author Ait Hamou, Zakaria
Levy, Nathan
Charpentier, Julien
Mira, Jean-Paul
Jamme, Matthieu
Jozwiak, Mathieu
author_facet Ait Hamou, Zakaria
Levy, Nathan
Charpentier, Julien
Mira, Jean-Paul
Jamme, Matthieu
Jozwiak, Mathieu
author_sort Ait Hamou, Zakaria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNC) may be an attractive first-line ventilatory support in COVID-19 patients. However, HNFC use for the management of COVID-19 patients and risk factors for HFNC failure remain to be determined. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included all consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) in the first (Mars-May 2020) and second (August 2020- February 202) French pandemic waves. Patients with limitations for intubation were excluded. HFNC failure was defined as the need for intubation after ICU admission. The impact of HFNC use was analyzed in the whole cohort and after constructing a propensity score. Risk factors for HNFC failure were identified through a landmark time-dependent cause-specific Cox model. The ability of the 6-h ROX index to detect HFNC failure was assessed by generating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: 200 patients were included: HFNC was used in 114(57%) patients, non-invasive ventilation in 25(12%) patients and 145(72%) patients were intubated with a median delay of 0 (0–2) days after ICU admission. Overall, 78(68%) patients had HFNC failure. Patients with HFNC failure had a higher ICU mortality rate (34 vs. 11%, p = 0.02) than those without. At landmark time of 48 and 72 h, SAPS-2 score, extent of CT-Scan abnormalities > 75% and HFNC duration (cause specific hazard ratio (CSH) = 0.11, 95% CI (0.04–0.28), per + 1 day, p < 0.001 at 48 h and CSH = 0.06, 95% CI (0.02–0.23), per + 1 day, p < 0.001 at 72 h) were associated with HFNC failure. The 6-h ROX index was lower in patients with HFNC failure but could not reliably predicted HFNC failure with an area under ROC curve of 0.65 (95% CI(0.52–0.78), p = 0.02). In the matched cohort, HFNC use was associated with a lower risk of intubation (CSH = 0.32, 95% CI (0.19–0.57), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In critically-ill COVID-19 patients, while HFNC use as first-line ventilatory support was associated with a lower risk of intubation, more than half of patients had HFNC failure. Risk factors for HFNC failure were SAPS-2 score and extent of CT-Scan abnormalities > 75%. The risk of HFNC failure could not be predicted by the 6-h ROX index but decreased after a 48-h HFNC duration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02231-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9719644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97196442022-12-05 Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and risk factors for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen failure in critically-ill patients with COVID-19 Ait Hamou, Zakaria Levy, Nathan Charpentier, Julien Mira, Jean-Paul Jamme, Matthieu Jozwiak, Mathieu Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNC) may be an attractive first-line ventilatory support in COVID-19 patients. However, HNFC use for the management of COVID-19 patients and risk factors for HFNC failure remain to be determined. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included all consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) in the first (Mars-May 2020) and second (August 2020- February 202) French pandemic waves. Patients with limitations for intubation were excluded. HFNC failure was defined as the need for intubation after ICU admission. The impact of HFNC use was analyzed in the whole cohort and after constructing a propensity score. Risk factors for HNFC failure were identified through a landmark time-dependent cause-specific Cox model. The ability of the 6-h ROX index to detect HFNC failure was assessed by generating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: 200 patients were included: HFNC was used in 114(57%) patients, non-invasive ventilation in 25(12%) patients and 145(72%) patients were intubated with a median delay of 0 (0–2) days after ICU admission. Overall, 78(68%) patients had HFNC failure. Patients with HFNC failure had a higher ICU mortality rate (34 vs. 11%, p = 0.02) than those without. At landmark time of 48 and 72 h, SAPS-2 score, extent of CT-Scan abnormalities > 75% and HFNC duration (cause specific hazard ratio (CSH) = 0.11, 95% CI (0.04–0.28), per + 1 day, p < 0.001 at 48 h and CSH = 0.06, 95% CI (0.02–0.23), per + 1 day, p < 0.001 at 72 h) were associated with HFNC failure. The 6-h ROX index was lower in patients with HFNC failure but could not reliably predicted HFNC failure with an area under ROC curve of 0.65 (95% CI(0.52–0.78), p = 0.02). In the matched cohort, HFNC use was associated with a lower risk of intubation (CSH = 0.32, 95% CI (0.19–0.57), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In critically-ill COVID-19 patients, while HFNC use as first-line ventilatory support was associated with a lower risk of intubation, more than half of patients had HFNC failure. Risk factors for HFNC failure were SAPS-2 score and extent of CT-Scan abnormalities > 75%. The risk of HFNC failure could not be predicted by the 6-h ROX index but decreased after a 48-h HFNC duration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02231-2. BioMed Central 2022-12-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9719644/ /pubmed/36463161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02231-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ait Hamou, Zakaria
Levy, Nathan
Charpentier, Julien
Mira, Jean-Paul
Jamme, Matthieu
Jozwiak, Mathieu
Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and risk factors for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen failure in critically-ill patients with COVID-19
title Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and risk factors for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen failure in critically-ill patients with COVID-19
title_full Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and risk factors for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen failure in critically-ill patients with COVID-19
title_fullStr Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and risk factors for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen failure in critically-ill patients with COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and risk factors for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen failure in critically-ill patients with COVID-19
title_short Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and risk factors for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen failure in critically-ill patients with COVID-19
title_sort use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and risk factors for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen failure in critically-ill patients with covid-19
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02231-2
work_keys_str_mv AT aithamouzakaria useofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandriskfactorsforhighflownasalcannulaoxygenfailureincriticallyillpatientswithcovid19
AT levynathan useofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandriskfactorsforhighflownasalcannulaoxygenfailureincriticallyillpatientswithcovid19
AT charpentierjulien useofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandriskfactorsforhighflownasalcannulaoxygenfailureincriticallyillpatientswithcovid19
AT mirajeanpaul useofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandriskfactorsforhighflownasalcannulaoxygenfailureincriticallyillpatientswithcovid19
AT jammematthieu useofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandriskfactorsforhighflownasalcannulaoxygenfailureincriticallyillpatientswithcovid19
AT jozwiakmathieu useofhighflownasalcannulaoxygenandriskfactorsforhighflownasalcannulaoxygenfailureincriticallyillpatientswithcovid19