Cargando…

Effects of vaccine registration on disease prophylaxis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The impact of the pandemic caused by the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), causing the disease COVID-19, has brought losses to the world in terms of deaths, economic and health problems. The expected return of the public to activities adapted to the new health situation led to discussions about...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosa, Suelia de Siqueira Rodrigues Fleury, da Silva, Ana Karoline Almeida, dos Santos, Carolina Ramos, Silva, Mayla dos Santos, Perillo, Ana Luísa Pereira, Mendonça, Arthur Faria, Rosa, Mario Fabrício Fleury, Sampaio, Thatiane Lima, Carneiro, Marcella Lemos Brettas, Rocha, José Carlos Tatmatsu, Piratelli-Filho, Antônio, de Oliveira, Allisson Lopes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-022-01053-z
_version_ 1784843371935694848
author Rosa, Suelia de Siqueira Rodrigues Fleury
da Silva, Ana Karoline Almeida
dos Santos, Carolina Ramos
Silva, Mayla dos Santos
Perillo, Ana Luísa Pereira
Mendonça, Arthur Faria
Rosa, Mario Fabrício Fleury
Sampaio, Thatiane Lima
Carneiro, Marcella Lemos Brettas
Rocha, José Carlos Tatmatsu
Piratelli-Filho, Antônio
de Oliveira, Allisson Lopes
author_facet Rosa, Suelia de Siqueira Rodrigues Fleury
da Silva, Ana Karoline Almeida
dos Santos, Carolina Ramos
Silva, Mayla dos Santos
Perillo, Ana Luísa Pereira
Mendonça, Arthur Faria
Rosa, Mario Fabrício Fleury
Sampaio, Thatiane Lima
Carneiro, Marcella Lemos Brettas
Rocha, José Carlos Tatmatsu
Piratelli-Filho, Antônio
de Oliveira, Allisson Lopes
author_sort Rosa, Suelia de Siqueira Rodrigues Fleury
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of the pandemic caused by the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), causing the disease COVID-19, has brought losses to the world in terms of deaths, economic and health problems. The expected return of the public to activities adapted to the new health situation led to discussions about the use of vaccination and its effects. However, the demand for proof of vaccination showed how inconsistent, unregistered, and uncontrolled this health process is with current technologies. Despite the proven effectiveness of vaccines in reducing infection rates, mortality, and morbidity, there are still doubts about their use in preventing certain infections and injuries, as well as the use of digital medical records for identification at public events and disease prevention. Therefore, this review aims to analyze the use of digital immunization cards in disease prevention in general. METHODS: A systematic review of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS /BSV, CINALH, and IEEE and Xplore was performed using PRISMA guidelines. The authors summarized the studies conducted over the last decade on the impacts of prophylaxis by control through immunization cards. Studies were selected using the following terms: Vaccination; Mobile Applications; Health Smarts Cards; Immunization Programs; Vaccination Coverage. For data analysis, we used Mendeley, Excel, RStudio, and Bibliometrix software among others. RESULTS: A total of 1828 publications were found. After applying eligibility criteria (Articles published in Portuguese, Spanish or English in the last 10 years). Studies that only dealt with paper or physical records were excluded, as well as studies that were not linked to their country’s health Department, as a possibility of bias exists with these types of information). After removing duplicates and applying filters 1 and 2, we included 18 studies in this review. This resulted in 18 papers that met our priori inclusion criteria; it was found that the most relevant sources were from the databases of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the selected studies, we found that scientific evidence and epidemiological surveillance are essential tools to characterize the efficiency and effectiveness of immunization passport protection intervention and to ethically justify them. Technological development of digital vaccine passports can assist in vaccination programs and positively impact disease prophylaxis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12938-022-01053-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9719654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97196542022-12-05 Effects of vaccine registration on disease prophylaxis: a systematic review Rosa, Suelia de Siqueira Rodrigues Fleury da Silva, Ana Karoline Almeida dos Santos, Carolina Ramos Silva, Mayla dos Santos Perillo, Ana Luísa Pereira Mendonça, Arthur Faria Rosa, Mario Fabrício Fleury Sampaio, Thatiane Lima Carneiro, Marcella Lemos Brettas Rocha, José Carlos Tatmatsu Piratelli-Filho, Antônio de Oliveira, Allisson Lopes Biomed Eng Online Review BACKGROUND: The impact of the pandemic caused by the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), causing the disease COVID-19, has brought losses to the world in terms of deaths, economic and health problems. The expected return of the public to activities adapted to the new health situation led to discussions about the use of vaccination and its effects. However, the demand for proof of vaccination showed how inconsistent, unregistered, and uncontrolled this health process is with current technologies. Despite the proven effectiveness of vaccines in reducing infection rates, mortality, and morbidity, there are still doubts about their use in preventing certain infections and injuries, as well as the use of digital medical records for identification at public events and disease prevention. Therefore, this review aims to analyze the use of digital immunization cards in disease prevention in general. METHODS: A systematic review of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS /BSV, CINALH, and IEEE and Xplore was performed using PRISMA guidelines. The authors summarized the studies conducted over the last decade on the impacts of prophylaxis by control through immunization cards. Studies were selected using the following terms: Vaccination; Mobile Applications; Health Smarts Cards; Immunization Programs; Vaccination Coverage. For data analysis, we used Mendeley, Excel, RStudio, and Bibliometrix software among others. RESULTS: A total of 1828 publications were found. After applying eligibility criteria (Articles published in Portuguese, Spanish or English in the last 10 years). Studies that only dealt with paper or physical records were excluded, as well as studies that were not linked to their country’s health Department, as a possibility of bias exists with these types of information). After removing duplicates and applying filters 1 and 2, we included 18 studies in this review. This resulted in 18 papers that met our priori inclusion criteria; it was found that the most relevant sources were from the databases of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the selected studies, we found that scientific evidence and epidemiological surveillance are essential tools to characterize the efficiency and effectiveness of immunization passport protection intervention and to ethically justify them. Technological development of digital vaccine passports can assist in vaccination programs and positively impact disease prophylaxis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12938-022-01053-z. BioMed Central 2022-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9719654/ /pubmed/36463207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-022-01053-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Rosa, Suelia de Siqueira Rodrigues Fleury
da Silva, Ana Karoline Almeida
dos Santos, Carolina Ramos
Silva, Mayla dos Santos
Perillo, Ana Luísa Pereira
Mendonça, Arthur Faria
Rosa, Mario Fabrício Fleury
Sampaio, Thatiane Lima
Carneiro, Marcella Lemos Brettas
Rocha, José Carlos Tatmatsu
Piratelli-Filho, Antônio
de Oliveira, Allisson Lopes
Effects of vaccine registration on disease prophylaxis: a systematic review
title Effects of vaccine registration on disease prophylaxis: a systematic review
title_full Effects of vaccine registration on disease prophylaxis: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effects of vaccine registration on disease prophylaxis: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effects of vaccine registration on disease prophylaxis: a systematic review
title_short Effects of vaccine registration on disease prophylaxis: a systematic review
title_sort effects of vaccine registration on disease prophylaxis: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-022-01053-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rosasueliadesiqueirarodriguesfleury effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview
AT dasilvaanakarolinealmeida effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview
AT dossantoscarolinaramos effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview
AT silvamayladossantos effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview
AT perilloanaluisapereira effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview
AT mendoncaarthurfaria effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview
AT rosamariofabriciofleury effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview
AT sampaiothatianelima effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview
AT carneiromarcellalemosbrettas effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview
AT rochajosecarlostatmatsu effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview
AT piratellifilhoantonio effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview
AT deoliveiraallissonlopes effectsofvaccineregistrationondiseaseprophylaxisasystematicreview