Cargando…

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Commercial Artificial Tears Between 0.18% and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate for Corneal Epithelial Healing in Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and rate of healing on the corneal epithelial defect after pterygium surgery through the application of either 0.18% or 0.3% sodium hyaluronate (SH). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was performed on patients who had pterygium surgery. Eigh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaidaroon, Winai, Pantarote, Suphitcha, Upaphong, Phit, Choovuthayakorn, Janejit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36475000
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S388276
_version_ 1784843383285481472
author Chaidaroon, Winai
Pantarote, Suphitcha
Upaphong, Phit
Choovuthayakorn, Janejit
author_facet Chaidaroon, Winai
Pantarote, Suphitcha
Upaphong, Phit
Choovuthayakorn, Janejit
author_sort Chaidaroon, Winai
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and rate of healing on the corneal epithelial defect after pterygium surgery through the application of either 0.18% or 0.3% sodium hyaluronate (SH). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was performed on patients who had pterygium surgery. Eighty-six patients were randomized to 2 groups that would receive either 0.18% SH or 0.3% SH. Measurements of area of the corneal epithelial defect using ImageJ freeware were performed. All corneal epithelial defects were measured immediately after the operation (Day 0) and for the next 3 days. RESULTS: The mean and SD of the area of corneal epithelial defect measured on postoperative Day 0, 1, and 2 were 9.13 ± 3.09 mm(2), 5.61 ± 3.26 mm(2), and 3.39 ± 2.70 mm(2) for 0.18% SH group, and 8.96 ± 3.17 mm(2), 4.03 ± 1.99 mm(2), and 1.55 ± 1.23 mm(2) for 0.3% SH group. There was no statistically significant difference of the initial area of the corneal epithelial defect on Day 0 between 0.18% and 0.3% SH group (p = 0.802). The area of the defects in the 0.3% SH group was significantly smaller than that of the 0.18% SH group on both Day 1 and Day 2 (p = 0.007, p < 0.001), respectively. Similarly, the 0.3% SH group exhibited a statistically significant higher (p < 0.001) rate of healing of the corneal epithelial defect over days 0 and 1 (4.94 ± 2.16 mm²/day) when compared to that of the 0.18% SH group (3.53 ± 1.66 mm²/day). CONCLUSION: With two commercial artificial tears, the corneal epithelial wound healing after pterygium surgery was faster in the 0.3% SH group than that of the 0.18% SH group. Superiority of 0.3% SH may be supported by the presence of epsilon-aminocaproic acid in this drug preparation. No significant adverse effects were exhibited during the short-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9719698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97196982022-12-05 Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Commercial Artificial Tears Between 0.18% and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate for Corneal Epithelial Healing in Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Chaidaroon, Winai Pantarote, Suphitcha Upaphong, Phit Choovuthayakorn, Janejit Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and rate of healing on the corneal epithelial defect after pterygium surgery through the application of either 0.18% or 0.3% sodium hyaluronate (SH). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was performed on patients who had pterygium surgery. Eighty-six patients were randomized to 2 groups that would receive either 0.18% SH or 0.3% SH. Measurements of area of the corneal epithelial defect using ImageJ freeware were performed. All corneal epithelial defects were measured immediately after the operation (Day 0) and for the next 3 days. RESULTS: The mean and SD of the area of corneal epithelial defect measured on postoperative Day 0, 1, and 2 were 9.13 ± 3.09 mm(2), 5.61 ± 3.26 mm(2), and 3.39 ± 2.70 mm(2) for 0.18% SH group, and 8.96 ± 3.17 mm(2), 4.03 ± 1.99 mm(2), and 1.55 ± 1.23 mm(2) for 0.3% SH group. There was no statistically significant difference of the initial area of the corneal epithelial defect on Day 0 between 0.18% and 0.3% SH group (p = 0.802). The area of the defects in the 0.3% SH group was significantly smaller than that of the 0.18% SH group on both Day 1 and Day 2 (p = 0.007, p < 0.001), respectively. Similarly, the 0.3% SH group exhibited a statistically significant higher (p < 0.001) rate of healing of the corneal epithelial defect over days 0 and 1 (4.94 ± 2.16 mm²/day) when compared to that of the 0.18% SH group (3.53 ± 1.66 mm²/day). CONCLUSION: With two commercial artificial tears, the corneal epithelial wound healing after pterygium surgery was faster in the 0.3% SH group than that of the 0.18% SH group. Superiority of 0.3% SH may be supported by the presence of epsilon-aminocaproic acid in this drug preparation. No significant adverse effects were exhibited during the short-term follow-up. Dove 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9719698/ /pubmed/36475000 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S388276 Text en © 2022 Chaidaroon et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Chaidaroon, Winai
Pantarote, Suphitcha
Upaphong, Phit
Choovuthayakorn, Janejit
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Commercial Artificial Tears Between 0.18% and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate for Corneal Epithelial Healing in Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Commercial Artificial Tears Between 0.18% and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate for Corneal Epithelial Healing in Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Commercial Artificial Tears Between 0.18% and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate for Corneal Epithelial Healing in Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Commercial Artificial Tears Between 0.18% and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate for Corneal Epithelial Healing in Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Commercial Artificial Tears Between 0.18% and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate for Corneal Epithelial Healing in Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Commercial Artificial Tears Between 0.18% and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate for Corneal Epithelial Healing in Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of efficacy and safety of two commercial artificial tears between 0.18% and 0.3% sodium hyaluronate for corneal epithelial healing in pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft transplantation: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36475000
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S388276
work_keys_str_mv AT chaidaroonwinai comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoftwocommercialartificialtearsbetween018and03sodiumhyaluronateforcornealepithelialhealinginpterygiumexcisionwithconjunctivalautografttransplantationastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pantarotesuphitcha comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoftwocommercialartificialtearsbetween018and03sodiumhyaluronateforcornealepithelialhealinginpterygiumexcisionwithconjunctivalautografttransplantationastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT upaphongphit comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoftwocommercialartificialtearsbetween018and03sodiumhyaluronateforcornealepithelialhealinginpterygiumexcisionwithconjunctivalautografttransplantationastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT choovuthayakornjanejit comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoftwocommercialartificialtearsbetween018and03sodiumhyaluronateforcornealepithelialhealinginpterygiumexcisionwithconjunctivalautografttransplantationastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial