Cargando…

Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods

Objectives : There is growing attention to health equity in health informatics research. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive framework outlining critical considerations for health informatics research with marginalized groups. Methods : Literature review and experiences from nine equity-fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veinot, Tiffany C., Clarke, Phillipa J., Romero, Daniel M., Buis, Lorraine R., Dillahunt, Tawanna R., Vydiswaran, Vinod V.G., Beals, Ashley, Brown, Lindsay, Richards, Olivia, Williamson, Alicia, Antonio, Marcy G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742542
_version_ 1784843399663190016
author Veinot, Tiffany C.
Clarke, Phillipa J.
Romero, Daniel M.
Buis, Lorraine R.
Dillahunt, Tawanna R.
Vydiswaran, Vinod V.G.
Beals, Ashley
Brown, Lindsay
Richards, Olivia
Williamson, Alicia
Antonio, Marcy G.
author_facet Veinot, Tiffany C.
Clarke, Phillipa J.
Romero, Daniel M.
Buis, Lorraine R.
Dillahunt, Tawanna R.
Vydiswaran, Vinod V.G.
Beals, Ashley
Brown, Lindsay
Richards, Olivia
Williamson, Alicia
Antonio, Marcy G.
author_sort Veinot, Tiffany C.
collection PubMed
description Objectives : There is growing attention to health equity in health informatics research. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive framework outlining critical considerations for health informatics research with marginalized groups. Methods : Literature review and experiences from nine equity-focused health informatics conducted in the United States and Canada. Studies focus on disparities related to age, disability or chronic illness, gender/sex, place of residence (rural/urban), race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status. Results : We found four key equity-related methodological considerations. To assist informaticists in addressing equity, we contribute a novel framework to synthesize these four considerations: PRAXIS (Participation and Representation, Appropriate methods and interventions, conteXtualization and structural competence, Investigation of Systematic differences). Participation and representation refers to the necessity for meaningful participation of marginalized groups in research, to elevate the voices of marginalized people, and to represent marginalized people as they are comfortable (e.g., asset-based versus deficit-based). Appropriate methods and interventions mean targeting methods, instruments, and interventions to reach and engage marginalized people. Contextualization and structural competence mean avoiding individualization of systematic disparities and targeting social conditions that (re-)produce inequities. Investigation of systematic differences highlights that experiences of people marginalized according to specific traits differ from those not so marginalized, and thus encourages studying the specificity of these differences and investigating and preventing intervention-generated inequality. We outline guidance for operationalizing these considerations at four research stages. Conclusions : This framework can assist informaticists in systematically addressing these considerations in their research in four research stages: project initiation; sampling and recruitment; data collection; and data analysis. We encourage others to use these insights from multiple studies to advance health equity in informatics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9719773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97197732022-12-05 Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods Veinot, Tiffany C. Clarke, Phillipa J. Romero, Daniel M. Buis, Lorraine R. Dillahunt, Tawanna R. Vydiswaran, Vinod V.G. Beals, Ashley Brown, Lindsay Richards, Olivia Williamson, Alicia Antonio, Marcy G. Yearb Med Inform Objectives : There is growing attention to health equity in health informatics research. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive framework outlining critical considerations for health informatics research with marginalized groups. Methods : Literature review and experiences from nine equity-focused health informatics conducted in the United States and Canada. Studies focus on disparities related to age, disability or chronic illness, gender/sex, place of residence (rural/urban), race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status. Results : We found four key equity-related methodological considerations. To assist informaticists in addressing equity, we contribute a novel framework to synthesize these four considerations: PRAXIS (Participation and Representation, Appropriate methods and interventions, conteXtualization and structural competence, Investigation of Systematic differences). Participation and representation refers to the necessity for meaningful participation of marginalized groups in research, to elevate the voices of marginalized people, and to represent marginalized people as they are comfortable (e.g., asset-based versus deficit-based). Appropriate methods and interventions mean targeting methods, instruments, and interventions to reach and engage marginalized people. Contextualization and structural competence mean avoiding individualization of systematic disparities and targeting social conditions that (re-)produce inequities. Investigation of systematic differences highlights that experiences of people marginalized according to specific traits differ from those not so marginalized, and thus encourages studying the specificity of these differences and investigating and preventing intervention-generated inequality. We outline guidance for operationalizing these considerations at four research stages. Conclusions : This framework can assist informaticists in systematically addressing these considerations in their research in four research stages: project initiation; sampling and recruitment; data collection; and data analysis. We encourage others to use these insights from multiple studies to advance health equity in informatics. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9719773/ /pubmed/36463889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742542 Text en IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Veinot, Tiffany C.
Clarke, Phillipa J.
Romero, Daniel M.
Buis, Lorraine R.
Dillahunt, Tawanna R.
Vydiswaran, Vinod V.G.
Beals, Ashley
Brown, Lindsay
Richards, Olivia
Williamson, Alicia
Antonio, Marcy G.
Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods
title Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods
title_full Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods
title_fullStr Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods
title_full_unstemmed Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods
title_short Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods
title_sort equitable research praxis: a framework for health informatics methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742542
work_keys_str_mv AT veinottiffanyc equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods
AT clarkephillipaj equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods
AT romerodanielm equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods
AT buislorrainer equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods
AT dillahunttawannar equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods
AT vydiswaranvinodvg equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods
AT bealsashley equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods
AT brownlindsay equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods
AT richardsolivia equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods
AT williamsonalicia equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods
AT antoniomarcyg equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods