Cargando…
Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods
Objectives : There is growing attention to health equity in health informatics research. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive framework outlining critical considerations for health informatics research with marginalized groups. Methods : Literature review and experiences from nine equity-fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742542 |
_version_ | 1784843399663190016 |
---|---|
author | Veinot, Tiffany C. Clarke, Phillipa J. Romero, Daniel M. Buis, Lorraine R. Dillahunt, Tawanna R. Vydiswaran, Vinod V.G. Beals, Ashley Brown, Lindsay Richards, Olivia Williamson, Alicia Antonio, Marcy G. |
author_facet | Veinot, Tiffany C. Clarke, Phillipa J. Romero, Daniel M. Buis, Lorraine R. Dillahunt, Tawanna R. Vydiswaran, Vinod V.G. Beals, Ashley Brown, Lindsay Richards, Olivia Williamson, Alicia Antonio, Marcy G. |
author_sort | Veinot, Tiffany C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives : There is growing attention to health equity in health informatics research. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive framework outlining critical considerations for health informatics research with marginalized groups. Methods : Literature review and experiences from nine equity-focused health informatics conducted in the United States and Canada. Studies focus on disparities related to age, disability or chronic illness, gender/sex, place of residence (rural/urban), race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status. Results : We found four key equity-related methodological considerations. To assist informaticists in addressing equity, we contribute a novel framework to synthesize these four considerations: PRAXIS (Participation and Representation, Appropriate methods and interventions, conteXtualization and structural competence, Investigation of Systematic differences). Participation and representation refers to the necessity for meaningful participation of marginalized groups in research, to elevate the voices of marginalized people, and to represent marginalized people as they are comfortable (e.g., asset-based versus deficit-based). Appropriate methods and interventions mean targeting methods, instruments, and interventions to reach and engage marginalized people. Contextualization and structural competence mean avoiding individualization of systematic disparities and targeting social conditions that (re-)produce inequities. Investigation of systematic differences highlights that experiences of people marginalized according to specific traits differ from those not so marginalized, and thus encourages studying the specificity of these differences and investigating and preventing intervention-generated inequality. We outline guidance for operationalizing these considerations at four research stages. Conclusions : This framework can assist informaticists in systematically addressing these considerations in their research in four research stages: project initiation; sampling and recruitment; data collection; and data analysis. We encourage others to use these insights from multiple studies to advance health equity in informatics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9719773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97197732022-12-05 Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods Veinot, Tiffany C. Clarke, Phillipa J. Romero, Daniel M. Buis, Lorraine R. Dillahunt, Tawanna R. Vydiswaran, Vinod V.G. Beals, Ashley Brown, Lindsay Richards, Olivia Williamson, Alicia Antonio, Marcy G. Yearb Med Inform Objectives : There is growing attention to health equity in health informatics research. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive framework outlining critical considerations for health informatics research with marginalized groups. Methods : Literature review and experiences from nine equity-focused health informatics conducted in the United States and Canada. Studies focus on disparities related to age, disability or chronic illness, gender/sex, place of residence (rural/urban), race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status. Results : We found four key equity-related methodological considerations. To assist informaticists in addressing equity, we contribute a novel framework to synthesize these four considerations: PRAXIS (Participation and Representation, Appropriate methods and interventions, conteXtualization and structural competence, Investigation of Systematic differences). Participation and representation refers to the necessity for meaningful participation of marginalized groups in research, to elevate the voices of marginalized people, and to represent marginalized people as they are comfortable (e.g., asset-based versus deficit-based). Appropriate methods and interventions mean targeting methods, instruments, and interventions to reach and engage marginalized people. Contextualization and structural competence mean avoiding individualization of systematic disparities and targeting social conditions that (re-)produce inequities. Investigation of systematic differences highlights that experiences of people marginalized according to specific traits differ from those not so marginalized, and thus encourages studying the specificity of these differences and investigating and preventing intervention-generated inequality. We outline guidance for operationalizing these considerations at four research stages. Conclusions : This framework can assist informaticists in systematically addressing these considerations in their research in four research stages: project initiation; sampling and recruitment; data collection; and data analysis. We encourage others to use these insights from multiple studies to advance health equity in informatics. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9719773/ /pubmed/36463889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742542 Text en IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Veinot, Tiffany C. Clarke, Phillipa J. Romero, Daniel M. Buis, Lorraine R. Dillahunt, Tawanna R. Vydiswaran, Vinod V.G. Beals, Ashley Brown, Lindsay Richards, Olivia Williamson, Alicia Antonio, Marcy G. Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods |
title | Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods |
title_full | Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods |
title_fullStr | Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods |
title_short | Equitable Research PRAXIS: A Framework for Health Informatics Methods |
title_sort | equitable research praxis: a framework for health informatics methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742542 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veinottiffanyc equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods AT clarkephillipaj equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods AT romerodanielm equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods AT buislorrainer equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods AT dillahunttawannar equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods AT vydiswaranvinodvg equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods AT bealsashley equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods AT brownlindsay equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods AT richardsolivia equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods AT williamsonalicia equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods AT antoniomarcyg equitableresearchpraxisaframeworkforhealthinformaticsmethods |