Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Automated Segmentation Methods and Public Datasets for the Lung and its Lobes and Findings on Computed Tomography Images
Objectives : Automated computational segmentation of the lung and its lobes and findings in X-Ray based computed tomography (CT) images is a challenging problem with important applications, including medical research, surgical planning, and diagnostic decision support. With the increase in large ima...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742517 |
_version_ | 1784843400935112704 |
---|---|
author | Carmo, Diedre Ribeiro, Jean Dertkigil, Sergio Appenzeller, Simone Lotufo, Roberto Rittner, Leticia |
author_facet | Carmo, Diedre Ribeiro, Jean Dertkigil, Sergio Appenzeller, Simone Lotufo, Roberto Rittner, Leticia |
author_sort | Carmo, Diedre |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives : Automated computational segmentation of the lung and its lobes and findings in X-Ray based computed tomography (CT) images is a challenging problem with important applications, including medical research, surgical planning, and diagnostic decision support. With the increase in large imaging cohorts and the need for fast and robust evaluation of normal and abnormal lungs and their lobes, several authors have proposed automated methods for lung assessment on CT images. In this paper we intend to provide a comprehensive summarization of these methods. Methods : We used a systematic approach to perform an extensive review of automated lung segmentation methods. We chose Scopus, PubMed, and Scopus to conduct our review and included methods that perform segmentation of the lung parenchyma, lobes or internal disease related findings. The review was not limited by date, but rather by only including methods providing quantitative evaluation. Results : We organized and classified all 234 included articles into various categories according to methodological similarities among them. We provide summarizations of quantitative evaluations, public datasets, evaluation metrics, and overall statistics indicating recent research directions of the field. Conclusions : We noted the rise of data-driven models in the last decade, especially due to the deep learning trend, increasing the demand for high-quality data annotation. This has instigated an increase of semi-supervised and uncertainty guided works that try to be less dependent on human annotation. In addition, the question of how to evaluate the robustness of data-driven methods remains open, given that evaluations derived from specific datasets are not general. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9719778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97197782022-12-05 A Systematic Review of Automated Segmentation Methods and Public Datasets for the Lung and its Lobes and Findings on Computed Tomography Images Carmo, Diedre Ribeiro, Jean Dertkigil, Sergio Appenzeller, Simone Lotufo, Roberto Rittner, Leticia Yearb Med Inform Objectives : Automated computational segmentation of the lung and its lobes and findings in X-Ray based computed tomography (CT) images is a challenging problem with important applications, including medical research, surgical planning, and diagnostic decision support. With the increase in large imaging cohorts and the need for fast and robust evaluation of normal and abnormal lungs and their lobes, several authors have proposed automated methods for lung assessment on CT images. In this paper we intend to provide a comprehensive summarization of these methods. Methods : We used a systematic approach to perform an extensive review of automated lung segmentation methods. We chose Scopus, PubMed, and Scopus to conduct our review and included methods that perform segmentation of the lung parenchyma, lobes or internal disease related findings. The review was not limited by date, but rather by only including methods providing quantitative evaluation. Results : We organized and classified all 234 included articles into various categories according to methodological similarities among them. We provide summarizations of quantitative evaluations, public datasets, evaluation metrics, and overall statistics indicating recent research directions of the field. Conclusions : We noted the rise of data-driven models in the last decade, especially due to the deep learning trend, increasing the demand for high-quality data annotation. This has instigated an increase of semi-supervised and uncertainty guided works that try to be less dependent on human annotation. In addition, the question of how to evaluate the robustness of data-driven methods remains open, given that evaluations derived from specific datasets are not general. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9719778/ /pubmed/36463886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742517 Text en IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Carmo, Diedre Ribeiro, Jean Dertkigil, Sergio Appenzeller, Simone Lotufo, Roberto Rittner, Leticia A Systematic Review of Automated Segmentation Methods and Public Datasets for the Lung and its Lobes and Findings on Computed Tomography Images |
title | A Systematic Review of Automated Segmentation Methods and Public Datasets for the Lung and its Lobes and Findings on Computed Tomography Images |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Automated Segmentation Methods and Public Datasets for the Lung and its Lobes and Findings on Computed Tomography Images |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Automated Segmentation Methods and Public Datasets for the Lung and its Lobes and Findings on Computed Tomography Images |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Automated Segmentation Methods and Public Datasets for the Lung and its Lobes and Findings on Computed Tomography Images |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Automated Segmentation Methods and Public Datasets for the Lung and its Lobes and Findings on Computed Tomography Images |
title_sort | systematic review of automated segmentation methods and public datasets for the lung and its lobes and findings on computed tomography images |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carmodiedre asystematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages AT ribeirojean asystematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages AT dertkigilsergio asystematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages AT appenzellersimone asystematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages AT lotuforoberto asystematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages AT rittnerleticia asystematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages AT carmodiedre systematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages AT ribeirojean systematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages AT dertkigilsergio systematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages AT appenzellersimone systematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages AT lotuforoberto systematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages AT rittnerleticia systematicreviewofautomatedsegmentationmethodsandpublicdatasetsforthelunganditslobesandfindingsoncomputedtomographyimages |