Cargando…

Simulations of frustrated Ising Hamiltonians using quantum approximate optimization

Novel magnetic materials are important for future technological advances. Theoretical and numerical calculations of ground-state properties are essential in understanding these materials, however, computational complexity limits conventional methods for studying these states. Here we investigate an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lotshaw, Phillip C., Xu, Hanjing, Khalid, Bilal, Buchs, Gilles, Humble, Travis S., Banerjee, Arnab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0414
_version_ 1784843404622954496
author Lotshaw, Phillip C.
Xu, Hanjing
Khalid, Bilal
Buchs, Gilles
Humble, Travis S.
Banerjee, Arnab
author_facet Lotshaw, Phillip C.
Xu, Hanjing
Khalid, Bilal
Buchs, Gilles
Humble, Travis S.
Banerjee, Arnab
author_sort Lotshaw, Phillip C.
collection PubMed
description Novel magnetic materials are important for future technological advances. Theoretical and numerical calculations of ground-state properties are essential in understanding these materials, however, computational complexity limits conventional methods for studying these states. Here we investigate an alternative approach to preparing materials ground states using the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) on near-term quantum computers. We study classical Ising spin models on unit cells of square, Shastry-Sutherland and triangular lattices, with varying field amplitudes and couplings in the material Hamiltonian. We find relationships between the theoretical QAOA success probability and the structure of the ground state, indicating that only a modest number of measurements ([Formula: see text]) are needed to find the ground state of our nine-spin Hamiltonians, even for parameters leading to frustrated magnetism. We further demonstrate the approach in calculations on a trapped-ion quantum computer and succeed in recovering each ground state of the Shastry-Sutherland unit cell with probabilities close to ideal theoretical values. The results demonstrate the viability of QAOA for materials ground state preparation in the frustrated Ising limit, giving important first steps towards larger sizes and more complex Hamiltonians where quantum computational advantage may prove essential in developing a systematic understanding of novel materials. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Quantum annealing and computation: challenges and perspectives’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9719794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97197942022-12-07 Simulations of frustrated Ising Hamiltonians using quantum approximate optimization Lotshaw, Phillip C. Xu, Hanjing Khalid, Bilal Buchs, Gilles Humble, Travis S. Banerjee, Arnab Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Articles Novel magnetic materials are important for future technological advances. Theoretical and numerical calculations of ground-state properties are essential in understanding these materials, however, computational complexity limits conventional methods for studying these states. Here we investigate an alternative approach to preparing materials ground states using the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) on near-term quantum computers. We study classical Ising spin models on unit cells of square, Shastry-Sutherland and triangular lattices, with varying field amplitudes and couplings in the material Hamiltonian. We find relationships between the theoretical QAOA success probability and the structure of the ground state, indicating that only a modest number of measurements ([Formula: see text]) are needed to find the ground state of our nine-spin Hamiltonians, even for parameters leading to frustrated magnetism. We further demonstrate the approach in calculations on a trapped-ion quantum computer and succeed in recovering each ground state of the Shastry-Sutherland unit cell with probabilities close to ideal theoretical values. The results demonstrate the viability of QAOA for materials ground state preparation in the frustrated Ising limit, giving important first steps towards larger sizes and more complex Hamiltonians where quantum computational advantage may prove essential in developing a systematic understanding of novel materials. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Quantum annealing and computation: challenges and perspectives’. The Royal Society 2023-01-23 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9719794/ /pubmed/36463920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0414 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Lotshaw, Phillip C.
Xu, Hanjing
Khalid, Bilal
Buchs, Gilles
Humble, Travis S.
Banerjee, Arnab
Simulations of frustrated Ising Hamiltonians using quantum approximate optimization
title Simulations of frustrated Ising Hamiltonians using quantum approximate optimization
title_full Simulations of frustrated Ising Hamiltonians using quantum approximate optimization
title_fullStr Simulations of frustrated Ising Hamiltonians using quantum approximate optimization
title_full_unstemmed Simulations of frustrated Ising Hamiltonians using quantum approximate optimization
title_short Simulations of frustrated Ising Hamiltonians using quantum approximate optimization
title_sort simulations of frustrated ising hamiltonians using quantum approximate optimization
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0414
work_keys_str_mv AT lotshawphillipc simulationsoffrustratedisinghamiltoniansusingquantumapproximateoptimization
AT xuhanjing simulationsoffrustratedisinghamiltoniansusingquantumapproximateoptimization
AT khalidbilal simulationsoffrustratedisinghamiltoniansusingquantumapproximateoptimization
AT buchsgilles simulationsoffrustratedisinghamiltoniansusingquantumapproximateoptimization
AT humbletraviss simulationsoffrustratedisinghamiltoniansusingquantumapproximateoptimization
AT banerjeearnab simulationsoffrustratedisinghamiltoniansusingquantumapproximateoptimization