Cargando…

External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare external root resorption (ERR) three-dimensionally in subjects treated with tooth-borne (TB) versus bone-borne (BB) rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Forty subjects who received tooth-borne RME (TB group, average age 13.3 years ± 1.10 years) or bone-borne RME (B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leonardi, Rosalia, Ronsivalle, Vincenzo, Barbato, Ersilia, Lagravère, Manuel, Flores-Mir, Carlos, Lo Giudice, Antonino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36464753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00439-y
_version_ 1784843422383734784
author Leonardi, Rosalia
Ronsivalle, Vincenzo
Barbato, Ersilia
Lagravère, Manuel
Flores-Mir, Carlos
Lo Giudice, Antonino
author_facet Leonardi, Rosalia
Ronsivalle, Vincenzo
Barbato, Ersilia
Lagravère, Manuel
Flores-Mir, Carlos
Lo Giudice, Antonino
author_sort Leonardi, Rosalia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare external root resorption (ERR) three-dimensionally in subjects treated with tooth-borne (TB) versus bone-borne (BB) rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Forty subjects who received tooth-borne RME (TB group, average age 13.3 years ± 1.10 years) or bone-borne RME (BB group, average age 14.7 ± 1.15 years) were assessed using CBCT imaging before treatment (T0) and after a 6-month retention period (T1). 3D reconstructions of the radicular anatomy of maxillary first molars (M1), first and second premolars (P1 and P2) were generated to calculate volumetric (mean and percentage values) and shape changes (deviation analysis of the radicular models) obtained at each time point. 2D assessment of radicular length changes was also performed for each tooth. Data were statistically analyzed to perform intra-group (different teeth) and inter-group comparisons. RESULTS: In both groups, all the investigated teeth showed a significant reduction in radicular volume and length (p < 0.05), with the first molars being the teeth most affected by the resorption process (volume and palatal root length). When volumetric radicular changes were calculated as a percentage of the pre-treatment volumes, no differences were found among the investigated teeth (p > 0.05). Based on the deviation analysis from radicular models superimposition, the areas most affected by shape change were the apex and bucco-medial root surface. Overall, the amount of ERR was significantly greater in the TB group (mm(3): M1 = 17.03, P1 = 6.42, P2 = 5.26) compared to the BB group (mm(3): M1 = 3.11, P1 = 1.04, P2 = 1.24). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the statistical significance, the difference in the amount of ERR of the posterior maxillary dentition between TB-RME and BB-RME remains clinically questionable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40510-022-00439-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9719874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97198742022-12-06 External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME Leonardi, Rosalia Ronsivalle, Vincenzo Barbato, Ersilia Lagravère, Manuel Flores-Mir, Carlos Lo Giudice, Antonino Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare external root resorption (ERR) three-dimensionally in subjects treated with tooth-borne (TB) versus bone-borne (BB) rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Forty subjects who received tooth-borne RME (TB group, average age 13.3 years ± 1.10 years) or bone-borne RME (BB group, average age 14.7 ± 1.15 years) were assessed using CBCT imaging before treatment (T0) and after a 6-month retention period (T1). 3D reconstructions of the radicular anatomy of maxillary first molars (M1), first and second premolars (P1 and P2) were generated to calculate volumetric (mean and percentage values) and shape changes (deviation analysis of the radicular models) obtained at each time point. 2D assessment of radicular length changes was also performed for each tooth. Data were statistically analyzed to perform intra-group (different teeth) and inter-group comparisons. RESULTS: In both groups, all the investigated teeth showed a significant reduction in radicular volume and length (p < 0.05), with the first molars being the teeth most affected by the resorption process (volume and palatal root length). When volumetric radicular changes were calculated as a percentage of the pre-treatment volumes, no differences were found among the investigated teeth (p > 0.05). Based on the deviation analysis from radicular models superimposition, the areas most affected by shape change were the apex and bucco-medial root surface. Overall, the amount of ERR was significantly greater in the TB group (mm(3): M1 = 17.03, P1 = 6.42, P2 = 5.26) compared to the BB group (mm(3): M1 = 3.11, P1 = 1.04, P2 = 1.24). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the statistical significance, the difference in the amount of ERR of the posterior maxillary dentition between TB-RME and BB-RME remains clinically questionable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40510-022-00439-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9719874/ /pubmed/36464753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00439-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Leonardi, Rosalia
Ronsivalle, Vincenzo
Barbato, Ersilia
Lagravère, Manuel
Flores-Mir, Carlos
Lo Giudice, Antonino
External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME
title External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME
title_full External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME
title_fullStr External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME
title_full_unstemmed External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME
title_short External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME
title_sort external root resorption (err) and rapid maxillary expansion (rme) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne rme
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36464753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00439-y
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardirosalia externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme
AT ronsivallevincenzo externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme
AT barbatoersilia externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme
AT lagraveremanuel externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme
AT floresmircarlos externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme
AT logiudiceantonino externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme