Cargando…
External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare external root resorption (ERR) three-dimensionally in subjects treated with tooth-borne (TB) versus bone-borne (BB) rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Forty subjects who received tooth-borne RME (TB group, average age 13.3 years ± 1.10 years) or bone-borne RME (B...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36464753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00439-y |
_version_ | 1784843422383734784 |
---|---|
author | Leonardi, Rosalia Ronsivalle, Vincenzo Barbato, Ersilia Lagravère, Manuel Flores-Mir, Carlos Lo Giudice, Antonino |
author_facet | Leonardi, Rosalia Ronsivalle, Vincenzo Barbato, Ersilia Lagravère, Manuel Flores-Mir, Carlos Lo Giudice, Antonino |
author_sort | Leonardi, Rosalia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare external root resorption (ERR) three-dimensionally in subjects treated with tooth-borne (TB) versus bone-borne (BB) rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Forty subjects who received tooth-borne RME (TB group, average age 13.3 years ± 1.10 years) or bone-borne RME (BB group, average age 14.7 ± 1.15 years) were assessed using CBCT imaging before treatment (T0) and after a 6-month retention period (T1). 3D reconstructions of the radicular anatomy of maxillary first molars (M1), first and second premolars (P1 and P2) were generated to calculate volumetric (mean and percentage values) and shape changes (deviation analysis of the radicular models) obtained at each time point. 2D assessment of radicular length changes was also performed for each tooth. Data were statistically analyzed to perform intra-group (different teeth) and inter-group comparisons. RESULTS: In both groups, all the investigated teeth showed a significant reduction in radicular volume and length (p < 0.05), with the first molars being the teeth most affected by the resorption process (volume and palatal root length). When volumetric radicular changes were calculated as a percentage of the pre-treatment volumes, no differences were found among the investigated teeth (p > 0.05). Based on the deviation analysis from radicular models superimposition, the areas most affected by shape change were the apex and bucco-medial root surface. Overall, the amount of ERR was significantly greater in the TB group (mm(3): M1 = 17.03, P1 = 6.42, P2 = 5.26) compared to the BB group (mm(3): M1 = 3.11, P1 = 1.04, P2 = 1.24). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the statistical significance, the difference in the amount of ERR of the posterior maxillary dentition between TB-RME and BB-RME remains clinically questionable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40510-022-00439-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9719874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97198742022-12-06 External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME Leonardi, Rosalia Ronsivalle, Vincenzo Barbato, Ersilia Lagravère, Manuel Flores-Mir, Carlos Lo Giudice, Antonino Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare external root resorption (ERR) three-dimensionally in subjects treated with tooth-borne (TB) versus bone-borne (BB) rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Forty subjects who received tooth-borne RME (TB group, average age 13.3 years ± 1.10 years) or bone-borne RME (BB group, average age 14.7 ± 1.15 years) were assessed using CBCT imaging before treatment (T0) and after a 6-month retention period (T1). 3D reconstructions of the radicular anatomy of maxillary first molars (M1), first and second premolars (P1 and P2) were generated to calculate volumetric (mean and percentage values) and shape changes (deviation analysis of the radicular models) obtained at each time point. 2D assessment of radicular length changes was also performed for each tooth. Data were statistically analyzed to perform intra-group (different teeth) and inter-group comparisons. RESULTS: In both groups, all the investigated teeth showed a significant reduction in radicular volume and length (p < 0.05), with the first molars being the teeth most affected by the resorption process (volume and palatal root length). When volumetric radicular changes were calculated as a percentage of the pre-treatment volumes, no differences were found among the investigated teeth (p > 0.05). Based on the deviation analysis from radicular models superimposition, the areas most affected by shape change were the apex and bucco-medial root surface. Overall, the amount of ERR was significantly greater in the TB group (mm(3): M1 = 17.03, P1 = 6.42, P2 = 5.26) compared to the BB group (mm(3): M1 = 3.11, P1 = 1.04, P2 = 1.24). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the statistical significance, the difference in the amount of ERR of the posterior maxillary dentition between TB-RME and BB-RME remains clinically questionable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40510-022-00439-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9719874/ /pubmed/36464753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00439-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Leonardi, Rosalia Ronsivalle, Vincenzo Barbato, Ersilia Lagravère, Manuel Flores-Mir, Carlos Lo Giudice, Antonino External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME |
title | External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME |
title_full | External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME |
title_fullStr | External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME |
title_full_unstemmed | External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME |
title_short | External root resorption (ERR) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne RME |
title_sort | external root resorption (err) and rapid maxillary expansion (rme) at post-retention stage: a comparison between tooth-borne and bone-borne rme |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9719874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36464753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00439-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leonardirosalia externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme AT ronsivallevincenzo externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme AT barbatoersilia externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme AT lagraveremanuel externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme AT floresmircarlos externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme AT logiudiceantonino externalrootresorptionerrandrapidmaxillaryexpansionrmeatpostretentionstageacomparisonbetweentoothborneandbonebornerme |