Cargando…

Apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE: This review assesses the effect of apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation on rates of hypoxaemia, successful intubation on the first attempt and other adverse events. DATA SOURCES: The databases searched included PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. An elect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: George, Shane, Wilson, Megan, Humphreys, Susan, Gibbons, Kristen, Long, Elliot, Schibler, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479287
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.918148
_version_ 1784843482621280256
author George, Shane
Wilson, Megan
Humphreys, Susan
Gibbons, Kristen
Long, Elliot
Schibler, Andreas
author_facet George, Shane
Wilson, Megan
Humphreys, Susan
Gibbons, Kristen
Long, Elliot
Schibler, Andreas
author_sort George, Shane
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This review assesses the effect of apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation on rates of hypoxaemia, successful intubation on the first attempt and other adverse events. DATA SOURCES: The databases searched included PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. An electronic search for unpublished studies was also performed. STUDY SELECTION: We screened studies that include children undergoing intubation, studies that evaluate the use of apnoeic oxygenation by any method or device with outcomes of hypoxaemia, intubation outcome and adverse events were eligible for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Screening, risk of bias, quality of evidence and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer where consensus could not be reached. DATA SYNTHESIS: From 362 screened studies, fourteen studies (N = 2442) met the eligibility criteria. Randomised controlled trials (N = 482) and studies performed in the operating theatre (N = 835) favoured the use of apnoeic oxygenation with a reduced incidence of hypoxaemia (RR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.47, p < 0.001, I(2) = 0% and RR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.68, p = 0.005, I(2) = 68% respectively). Studies in the ED and PICU were of lower methodological quality, displaying heterogeneity in their results and were unsuitable for meta-analysis. Among the studies reporting first attempt intubation success, there were inconsistent effects reported and data were not suitable for meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: There is a growing body of evidence to support the use of apnoeic oxygenation during the intubation of children. Further research is required to determine optimal flow rates and delivery technique. The use of humidified high-flow oxygen shows promise as an effective technique based on data in the operating theatre, however its efficacy has not been shown to be superior to low flow oxygen in either the elective anesthetic or emergency intubation situations Systematic Review Registration: This review was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO international register of systematic reviews (Reference: CRD42020170884, registered April 28, 2020).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9720125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97201252022-12-06 Apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation: A systematic review George, Shane Wilson, Megan Humphreys, Susan Gibbons, Kristen Long, Elliot Schibler, Andreas Front Pediatr Pediatrics OBJECTIVE: This review assesses the effect of apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation on rates of hypoxaemia, successful intubation on the first attempt and other adverse events. DATA SOURCES: The databases searched included PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. An electronic search for unpublished studies was also performed. STUDY SELECTION: We screened studies that include children undergoing intubation, studies that evaluate the use of apnoeic oxygenation by any method or device with outcomes of hypoxaemia, intubation outcome and adverse events were eligible for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Screening, risk of bias, quality of evidence and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer where consensus could not be reached. DATA SYNTHESIS: From 362 screened studies, fourteen studies (N = 2442) met the eligibility criteria. Randomised controlled trials (N = 482) and studies performed in the operating theatre (N = 835) favoured the use of apnoeic oxygenation with a reduced incidence of hypoxaemia (RR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.47, p < 0.001, I(2) = 0% and RR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.68, p = 0.005, I(2) = 68% respectively). Studies in the ED and PICU were of lower methodological quality, displaying heterogeneity in their results and were unsuitable for meta-analysis. Among the studies reporting first attempt intubation success, there were inconsistent effects reported and data were not suitable for meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: There is a growing body of evidence to support the use of apnoeic oxygenation during the intubation of children. Further research is required to determine optimal flow rates and delivery technique. The use of humidified high-flow oxygen shows promise as an effective technique based on data in the operating theatre, however its efficacy has not been shown to be superior to low flow oxygen in either the elective anesthetic or emergency intubation situations Systematic Review Registration: This review was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO international register of systematic reviews (Reference: CRD42020170884, registered April 28, 2020). Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9720125/ /pubmed/36479287 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.918148 Text en © 2022 George, Wilson, Humphreys, Gibbons, Long and Schibler. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
George, Shane
Wilson, Megan
Humphreys, Susan
Gibbons, Kristen
Long, Elliot
Schibler, Andreas
Apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation: A systematic review
title Apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation: A systematic review
title_full Apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation: A systematic review
title_fullStr Apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation: A systematic review
title_short Apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation: A systematic review
title_sort apnoeic oxygenation during paediatric intubation: a systematic review
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479287
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.918148
work_keys_str_mv AT georgeshane apnoeicoxygenationduringpaediatricintubationasystematicreview
AT wilsonmegan apnoeicoxygenationduringpaediatricintubationasystematicreview
AT humphreyssusan apnoeicoxygenationduringpaediatricintubationasystematicreview
AT gibbonskristen apnoeicoxygenationduringpaediatricintubationasystematicreview
AT longelliot apnoeicoxygenationduringpaediatricintubationasystematicreview
AT schiblerandreas apnoeicoxygenationduringpaediatricintubationasystematicreview