Cargando…

Do national policies for complaint handling in English hospitals support quality improvement? Lessons from a case study

OBJECTIVES: A range of public inquiries in the English National Health Service have indicated repeating failings in complaint handling, and patients are often left dissatisfied. The complex, bureaucratic nature of complaints systems is often cited as an obstacle to meaningful investigation and learn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dael, J, Reader, TW, Gillespie, AT, Freise, L, Darzi, A, Mayer, EK
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01410768221098247
_version_ 1784843523221094400
author van Dael, J
Reader, TW
Gillespie, AT
Freise, L
Darzi, A
Mayer, EK
author_facet van Dael, J
Reader, TW
Gillespie, AT
Freise, L
Darzi, A
Mayer, EK
author_sort van Dael, J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A range of public inquiries in the English National Health Service have indicated repeating failings in complaint handling, and patients are often left dissatisfied. The complex, bureaucratic nature of complaints systems is often cited as an obstacle to meaningful investigation and learning, but a detailed examination of how such bureaucratic rules, regulations, and infrastructure shape complaint handling, and where change is most needed, remains relatively unexplored. We sought to examine how national policies structure local practices of complaint handling, how they are understood by those responsible for enacting them, and if there are any discrepancies between policies-as-intended and their reality in local practice. DESIGN: Case study involving staff interviews and documentary analysis. SETTING: A large acute and multi-site NHS Trust in England. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical, managerial, complaints, and patient advocacy staff involved in complaint handling at the participating NHS Trust (n=20). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: Findings illustrate four areas of practice where national policies and regulations can have adverse consequences within local practices, and partly function to undermine an improvement-focused approach to complaints. These include muddled routes for raising formal complaints, investigative procedures structured to scrutinize the ‘validity’ of complaints, futile data collection systems, and adverse incentives and workarounds resulting from bureaucratic performance targets. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates how national policies and regulations for complaint handling can impede, rather than promote, quality improvement in local settings. Accordingly, we propose a number of necessary reforms, including patient involvement in complaints investigations, the establishment of independent investigation bodies, and more meaningful data analysis strategies to uncover and address systemic causes behind recurring complaints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9720291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97202912022-12-09 Do national policies for complaint handling in English hospitals support quality improvement? Lessons from a case study van Dael, J Reader, TW Gillespie, AT Freise, L Darzi, A Mayer, EK J R Soc Med Research OBJECTIVES: A range of public inquiries in the English National Health Service have indicated repeating failings in complaint handling, and patients are often left dissatisfied. The complex, bureaucratic nature of complaints systems is often cited as an obstacle to meaningful investigation and learning, but a detailed examination of how such bureaucratic rules, regulations, and infrastructure shape complaint handling, and where change is most needed, remains relatively unexplored. We sought to examine how national policies structure local practices of complaint handling, how they are understood by those responsible for enacting them, and if there are any discrepancies between policies-as-intended and their reality in local practice. DESIGN: Case study involving staff interviews and documentary analysis. SETTING: A large acute and multi-site NHS Trust in England. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical, managerial, complaints, and patient advocacy staff involved in complaint handling at the participating NHS Trust (n=20). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: Findings illustrate four areas of practice where national policies and regulations can have adverse consequences within local practices, and partly function to undermine an improvement-focused approach to complaints. These include muddled routes for raising formal complaints, investigative procedures structured to scrutinize the ‘validity’ of complaints, futile data collection systems, and adverse incentives and workarounds resulting from bureaucratic performance targets. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates how national policies and regulations for complaint handling can impede, rather than promote, quality improvement in local settings. Accordingly, we propose a number of necessary reforms, including patient involvement in complaints investigations, the establishment of independent investigation bodies, and more meaningful data analysis strategies to uncover and address systemic causes behind recurring complaints. SAGE Publications 2022-05-31 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9720291/ /pubmed/35640642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01410768221098247 Text en © The Royal Society of Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research
van Dael, J
Reader, TW
Gillespie, AT
Freise, L
Darzi, A
Mayer, EK
Do national policies for complaint handling in English hospitals support quality improvement? Lessons from a case study
title Do national policies for complaint handling in English hospitals support quality improvement? Lessons from a case study
title_full Do national policies for complaint handling in English hospitals support quality improvement? Lessons from a case study
title_fullStr Do national policies for complaint handling in English hospitals support quality improvement? Lessons from a case study
title_full_unstemmed Do national policies for complaint handling in English hospitals support quality improvement? Lessons from a case study
title_short Do national policies for complaint handling in English hospitals support quality improvement? Lessons from a case study
title_sort do national policies for complaint handling in english hospitals support quality improvement? lessons from a case study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01410768221098247
work_keys_str_mv AT vandaelj donationalpoliciesforcomplainthandlinginenglishhospitalssupportqualityimprovementlessonsfromacasestudy
AT readertw donationalpoliciesforcomplainthandlinginenglishhospitalssupportqualityimprovementlessonsfromacasestudy
AT gillespieat donationalpoliciesforcomplainthandlinginenglishhospitalssupportqualityimprovementlessonsfromacasestudy
AT freisel donationalpoliciesforcomplainthandlinginenglishhospitalssupportqualityimprovementlessonsfromacasestudy
AT darzia donationalpoliciesforcomplainthandlinginenglishhospitalssupportqualityimprovementlessonsfromacasestudy
AT mayerek donationalpoliciesforcomplainthandlinginenglishhospitalssupportqualityimprovementlessonsfromacasestudy