Cargando…

In-office Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants via Minimally Invasive Punch Technique in a Veteran Population

OBJECTIVE: Describe the feasibility and safety of completing bone-anchored hearing implants via the minimally invasive punch technique in the in-office setting. STUDY DESIGN: This single-institution case series included 20 patients who underwent in-office bone-anchored hearing implant placement unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, Jackson, Leon, Isabella, Squires, Lane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35349358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01945998221086841
_version_ 1784843609661505536
author King, Jackson
Leon, Isabella
Squires, Lane
author_facet King, Jackson
Leon, Isabella
Squires, Lane
author_sort King, Jackson
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Describe the feasibility and safety of completing bone-anchored hearing implants via the minimally invasive punch technique in the in-office setting. STUDY DESIGN: This single-institution case series included 20 patients who underwent in-office bone-anchored hearing implant placement under local anesthesia from 2018 to 2021. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Northern California Healthcare System. METHODS: Following completion of the case series, patients were retrospectively surveyed regarding their satisfaction with this approach via a modified SSQ-8 (Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire) to fit our purposes. RESULTS: A total of 23 implants were completed in the in-office setting on 20 patients. Intra- and postoperative complication rates, including skin changes, irritation, infection, and poor wound healing, were similar to or better than currently published complication rates in the literature. In addition, patients reported overwhelmingly positive responses on the SSQ-8, almost universally stating that they were “very satisfied” with their clinic experience. CONCLUSION: This case series suggests that it is feasible and safe to complete this procedure in the clinic under local anesthesia, but further prospective studies are needed to evaluate this in a more generalized population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9720705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97207052022-12-06 In-office Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants via Minimally Invasive Punch Technique in a Veteran Population King, Jackson Leon, Isabella Squires, Lane Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Otology and Neurotology OBJECTIVE: Describe the feasibility and safety of completing bone-anchored hearing implants via the minimally invasive punch technique in the in-office setting. STUDY DESIGN: This single-institution case series included 20 patients who underwent in-office bone-anchored hearing implant placement under local anesthesia from 2018 to 2021. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Northern California Healthcare System. METHODS: Following completion of the case series, patients were retrospectively surveyed regarding their satisfaction with this approach via a modified SSQ-8 (Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire) to fit our purposes. RESULTS: A total of 23 implants were completed in the in-office setting on 20 patients. Intra- and postoperative complication rates, including skin changes, irritation, infection, and poor wound healing, were similar to or better than currently published complication rates in the literature. In addition, patients reported overwhelmingly positive responses on the SSQ-8, almost universally stating that they were “very satisfied” with their clinic experience. CONCLUSION: This case series suggests that it is feasible and safe to complete this procedure in the clinic under local anesthesia, but further prospective studies are needed to evaluate this in a more generalized population. SAGE Publications 2022-03-29 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9720705/ /pubmed/35349358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01945998221086841 Text en © American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Otology and Neurotology
King, Jackson
Leon, Isabella
Squires, Lane
In-office Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants via Minimally Invasive Punch Technique in a Veteran Population
title In-office Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants via Minimally Invasive Punch Technique in a Veteran Population
title_full In-office Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants via Minimally Invasive Punch Technique in a Veteran Population
title_fullStr In-office Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants via Minimally Invasive Punch Technique in a Veteran Population
title_full_unstemmed In-office Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants via Minimally Invasive Punch Technique in a Veteran Population
title_short In-office Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants via Minimally Invasive Punch Technique in a Veteran Population
title_sort in-office bone-anchored hearing implants via minimally invasive punch technique in a veteran population
topic Otology and Neurotology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35349358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01945998221086841
work_keys_str_mv AT kingjackson inofficeboneanchoredhearingimplantsviaminimallyinvasivepunchtechniqueinaveteranpopulation
AT leonisabella inofficeboneanchoredhearingimplantsviaminimallyinvasivepunchtechniqueinaveteranpopulation
AT squireslane inofficeboneanchoredhearingimplantsviaminimallyinvasivepunchtechniqueinaveteranpopulation