Cargando…

Performance Comparison of Spectral Distance Calculation Methods

Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy is a widely used technique for assessing the higher-order structure (HOS) of biopharmaceuticals, including antibody drugs. Since the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use established quality control gu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oyama, Taiji, Suzuki, Satoko, Horiguchi, Yasuo, Yamane, Ai, Akao, Kenichi, Nagamori, Koushi, Tsumoto, Kouhei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00037028221121687
_version_ 1784843611210252288
author Oyama, Taiji
Suzuki, Satoko
Horiguchi, Yasuo
Yamane, Ai
Akao, Kenichi
Nagamori, Koushi
Tsumoto, Kouhei
author_facet Oyama, Taiji
Suzuki, Satoko
Horiguchi, Yasuo
Yamane, Ai
Akao, Kenichi
Nagamori, Koushi
Tsumoto, Kouhei
author_sort Oyama, Taiji
collection PubMed
description Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy is a widely used technique for assessing the higher-order structure (HOS) of biopharmaceuticals, including antibody drugs. Since the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use established quality control guidelines, objective evaluation of spectral similarity has been required in order to assess structural comparability. Several spectral distance quantification methods and weighting functions to increase sensitivity have been proposed, but not many reports have compared their performance for CD spectra. We constructed comparison sets that combine actual spectra and simulated noise and performed a comprehensive performance evaluation of each spectral distance calculation method and weighting function under conditions that consider spectral noise and fluctuations from pipetting errors. The results showed that using the Euclidean distance or Manhattan distance with Savitzky–Golay noise reduction is effective for spectral distance assessment. For the weighting function, it is preferable to combine the spectral intensity weighting function and the noise weighting function. In addition, the introduction of the external stimulus weighting function should be considered to improve the sensitivity. It is crucial to select the weighting function based on the balance between spectral changes and noise distributions for robust, sensitive antibody HOS similarity assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9720711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97207112022-12-06 Performance Comparison of Spectral Distance Calculation Methods Oyama, Taiji Suzuki, Satoko Horiguchi, Yasuo Yamane, Ai Akao, Kenichi Nagamori, Koushi Tsumoto, Kouhei Appl Spectrosc Submitted Papers Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy is a widely used technique for assessing the higher-order structure (HOS) of biopharmaceuticals, including antibody drugs. Since the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use established quality control guidelines, objective evaluation of spectral similarity has been required in order to assess structural comparability. Several spectral distance quantification methods and weighting functions to increase sensitivity have been proposed, but not many reports have compared their performance for CD spectra. We constructed comparison sets that combine actual spectra and simulated noise and performed a comprehensive performance evaluation of each spectral distance calculation method and weighting function under conditions that consider spectral noise and fluctuations from pipetting errors. The results showed that using the Euclidean distance or Manhattan distance with Savitzky–Golay noise reduction is effective for spectral distance assessment. For the weighting function, it is preferable to combine the spectral intensity weighting function and the noise weighting function. In addition, the introduction of the external stimulus weighting function should be considered to improve the sensitivity. It is crucial to select the weighting function based on the balance between spectral changes and noise distributions for robust, sensitive antibody HOS similarity assessment. SAGE Publications 2022-10-05 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9720711/ /pubmed/36197444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00037028221121687 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Submitted Papers
Oyama, Taiji
Suzuki, Satoko
Horiguchi, Yasuo
Yamane, Ai
Akao, Kenichi
Nagamori, Koushi
Tsumoto, Kouhei
Performance Comparison of Spectral Distance Calculation Methods
title Performance Comparison of Spectral Distance Calculation Methods
title_full Performance Comparison of Spectral Distance Calculation Methods
title_fullStr Performance Comparison of Spectral Distance Calculation Methods
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison of Spectral Distance Calculation Methods
title_short Performance Comparison of Spectral Distance Calculation Methods
title_sort performance comparison of spectral distance calculation methods
topic Submitted Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00037028221121687
work_keys_str_mv AT oyamataiji performancecomparisonofspectraldistancecalculationmethods
AT suzukisatoko performancecomparisonofspectraldistancecalculationmethods
AT horiguchiyasuo performancecomparisonofspectraldistancecalculationmethods
AT yamaneai performancecomparisonofspectraldistancecalculationmethods
AT akaokenichi performancecomparisonofspectraldistancecalculationmethods
AT nagamorikoushi performancecomparisonofspectraldistancecalculationmethods
AT tsumotokouhei performancecomparisonofspectraldistancecalculationmethods