Cargando…

Association between ventricular premature contraction burden and ventricular repolarization duration

OBJECTIVE: Premature ventricular contraction is generally known as benign in the absence of structural heart disease; however, premature ventricular contraction-induced left ventricular systolic dysfunction or ventricular arrhythmias are defined in some cases. Ventricular repolarization duration dif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Söylemez, Nihat, Yaman, Belma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Médica Brasileira 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36449776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20220676
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Premature ventricular contraction is generally known as benign in the absence of structural heart disease; however, premature ventricular contraction-induced left ventricular systolic dysfunction or ventricular arrhythmias are defined in some cases. Ventricular repolarization duration differs between myocardial cells, which causes myocardial electrical heterogeneity and is thought to be responsible for ventricular arrhythmias. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the association of ventricular repolarization parameters including Tp-Te interval, Tp-Te/QT ratio, and QRS-T angle with premature ventricular contraction frequency in patients with premature ventricular contraction burden. METHODS: A total of 80 subjects who were admitted to our cardiology department and underwent 24-h electrocardiography Holter monitoring were included. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 is defined as premature ventricular contraction burden that had frequent premature ventricular contraction ≥1% in 24-h Holter monitoring, and group 2 is defined as rare premature ventricular contraction <1% in 24-h Holter monitoring. RESULTS: Tp-Te interval and Tp-Te/QT ratio are statistically significantly prolonged in the premature ventricular contraction burden group than in the control group (85.3±13.9 vs. 65.7±11.9, p<0.001; 0.19±0.03 vs. 0.15±0.02, p<0.001, respectively). QRS-T angle was statistically significantly abnormal in the premature ventricular contraction burden group (p=0.024). CONCLUSION: Increased Tp-Te interval and widened QRS-T angle are associated with ventricular arrhythmias and might be used for the prediction of premature ventricular contraction burden in patients with premature ventricular contraction in electrocardiography in the absence of 24-h Holter monitoring.