Cargando…
Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement
BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies support the use of suture tape reinforcement for limiting graft elongation and increasing strength in knee ligament reconstructions. PURPOSE: To compare posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) laxity, complication and reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221137357 |
_version_ | 1784843631636512768 |
---|---|
author | Therrien, Erik Pareek, Ayoosh Song, Bryant M. Wilbur, Ryan R. Till, Sara E. Krych, Aaron J. Stuart, Michael J. Levy, Bruce A. |
author_facet | Therrien, Erik Pareek, Ayoosh Song, Bryant M. Wilbur, Ryan R. Till, Sara E. Krych, Aaron J. Stuart, Michael J. Levy, Bruce A. |
author_sort | Therrien, Erik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies support the use of suture tape reinforcement for limiting graft elongation and increasing strength in knee ligament reconstructions. PURPOSE: To compare posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) laxity, complication and reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after all-inside single-bundle PCL reconstruction (PCLR) with versus without independent suture tape reinforcement. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent primary, all-inside allograft single-bundle PCLR with and without independent suture tape reinforcement at a single academic institution from 2012 to 2019. Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, additional injuries, and concomitant procedures. PRO scores (including the International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm scores), bilateral comparison kneeling radiographs, and physical examination findings were collected at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Included were 50 patients: 19 with suture tape reinforcement (mean age 30.6 ± 2.9 years) and 31 without suture tape reinforcement (control group; mean age 26.2 ± 1.6 years). One PCLR graft in the suture tape group failed. Posterior drawer examination revealed grade 1+ laxity in 4 of 19 (21%) of the suture tape cohort versus 6 of 31 (19%) of the control cohort (P > .999). Bilateral kneeling radiographs showed similar side-to-side differences in laxity between the groups (suture tape vs control: mean, 1.9 ± 0.4 vs 2.6 ± 0.6 mm; P = .361). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in postoperative IKDC (suture tape vs control: 79.3 vs 79.6; P = .779), Lysholm (87.5 vs 84.3; P = .828), or Tegner activity (5.6 vs 5.7; P = .562) scores. CONCLUSION: All-inside single-bundle PCLR with and without independent suture tape reinforcement demonstrated low rates of graft failure, complications, and reoperations, with satisfactory PROs at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic posterior tibial translation was comparable between the 2 groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9720802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97208022022-12-06 Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement Therrien, Erik Pareek, Ayoosh Song, Bryant M. Wilbur, Ryan R. Till, Sara E. Krych, Aaron J. Stuart, Michael J. Levy, Bruce A. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies support the use of suture tape reinforcement for limiting graft elongation and increasing strength in knee ligament reconstructions. PURPOSE: To compare posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) laxity, complication and reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after all-inside single-bundle PCL reconstruction (PCLR) with versus without independent suture tape reinforcement. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent primary, all-inside allograft single-bundle PCLR with and without independent suture tape reinforcement at a single academic institution from 2012 to 2019. Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, additional injuries, and concomitant procedures. PRO scores (including the International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm scores), bilateral comparison kneeling radiographs, and physical examination findings were collected at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Included were 50 patients: 19 with suture tape reinforcement (mean age 30.6 ± 2.9 years) and 31 without suture tape reinforcement (control group; mean age 26.2 ± 1.6 years). One PCLR graft in the suture tape group failed. Posterior drawer examination revealed grade 1+ laxity in 4 of 19 (21%) of the suture tape cohort versus 6 of 31 (19%) of the control cohort (P > .999). Bilateral kneeling radiographs showed similar side-to-side differences in laxity between the groups (suture tape vs control: mean, 1.9 ± 0.4 vs 2.6 ± 0.6 mm; P = .361). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in postoperative IKDC (suture tape vs control: 79.3 vs 79.6; P = .779), Lysholm (87.5 vs 84.3; P = .828), or Tegner activity (5.6 vs 5.7; P = .562) scores. CONCLUSION: All-inside single-bundle PCLR with and without independent suture tape reinforcement demonstrated low rates of graft failure, complications, and reoperations, with satisfactory PROs at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic posterior tibial translation was comparable between the 2 groups. SAGE Publications 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9720802/ /pubmed/36479468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221137357 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Therrien, Erik Pareek, Ayoosh Song, Bryant M. Wilbur, Ryan R. Till, Sara E. Krych, Aaron J. Stuart, Michael J. Levy, Bruce A. Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement |
title | Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement |
title_full | Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement |
title_short | Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement |
title_sort | comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an all-inside technique with and without independent suture tape reinforcement |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221137357 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT therrienerik comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement AT pareekayoosh comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement AT songbryantm comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement AT wilburryanr comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement AT tillsarae comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement AT krychaaronj comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement AT stuartmichaelj comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement AT levybrucea comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement |