Cargando…

Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies support the use of suture tape reinforcement for limiting graft elongation and increasing strength in knee ligament reconstructions. PURPOSE: To compare posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) laxity, complication and reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Therrien, Erik, Pareek, Ayoosh, Song, Bryant M., Wilbur, Ryan R., Till, Sara E., Krych, Aaron J., Stuart, Michael J., Levy, Bruce A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221137357
_version_ 1784843631636512768
author Therrien, Erik
Pareek, Ayoosh
Song, Bryant M.
Wilbur, Ryan R.
Till, Sara E.
Krych, Aaron J.
Stuart, Michael J.
Levy, Bruce A.
author_facet Therrien, Erik
Pareek, Ayoosh
Song, Bryant M.
Wilbur, Ryan R.
Till, Sara E.
Krych, Aaron J.
Stuart, Michael J.
Levy, Bruce A.
author_sort Therrien, Erik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies support the use of suture tape reinforcement for limiting graft elongation and increasing strength in knee ligament reconstructions. PURPOSE: To compare posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) laxity, complication and reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after all-inside single-bundle PCL reconstruction (PCLR) with versus without independent suture tape reinforcement. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent primary, all-inside allograft single-bundle PCLR with and without independent suture tape reinforcement at a single academic institution from 2012 to 2019. Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, additional injuries, and concomitant procedures. PRO scores (including the International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm scores), bilateral comparison kneeling radiographs, and physical examination findings were collected at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Included were 50 patients: 19 with suture tape reinforcement (mean age 30.6 ± 2.9 years) and 31 without suture tape reinforcement (control group; mean age 26.2 ± 1.6 years). One PCLR graft in the suture tape group failed. Posterior drawer examination revealed grade 1+ laxity in 4 of 19 (21%) of the suture tape cohort versus 6 of 31 (19%) of the control cohort (P > .999). Bilateral kneeling radiographs showed similar side-to-side differences in laxity between the groups (suture tape vs control: mean, 1.9 ± 0.4 vs 2.6 ± 0.6 mm; P = .361). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in postoperative IKDC (suture tape vs control: 79.3 vs 79.6; P = .779), Lysholm (87.5 vs 84.3; P = .828), or Tegner activity (5.6 vs 5.7; P = .562) scores. CONCLUSION: All-inside single-bundle PCLR with and without independent suture tape reinforcement demonstrated low rates of graft failure, complications, and reoperations, with satisfactory PROs at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic posterior tibial translation was comparable between the 2 groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9720802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97208022022-12-06 Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement Therrien, Erik Pareek, Ayoosh Song, Bryant M. Wilbur, Ryan R. Till, Sara E. Krych, Aaron J. Stuart, Michael J. Levy, Bruce A. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies support the use of suture tape reinforcement for limiting graft elongation and increasing strength in knee ligament reconstructions. PURPOSE: To compare posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) laxity, complication and reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after all-inside single-bundle PCL reconstruction (PCLR) with versus without independent suture tape reinforcement. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent primary, all-inside allograft single-bundle PCLR with and without independent suture tape reinforcement at a single academic institution from 2012 to 2019. Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, additional injuries, and concomitant procedures. PRO scores (including the International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm scores), bilateral comparison kneeling radiographs, and physical examination findings were collected at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Included were 50 patients: 19 with suture tape reinforcement (mean age 30.6 ± 2.9 years) and 31 without suture tape reinforcement (control group; mean age 26.2 ± 1.6 years). One PCLR graft in the suture tape group failed. Posterior drawer examination revealed grade 1+ laxity in 4 of 19 (21%) of the suture tape cohort versus 6 of 31 (19%) of the control cohort (P > .999). Bilateral kneeling radiographs showed similar side-to-side differences in laxity between the groups (suture tape vs control: mean, 1.9 ± 0.4 vs 2.6 ± 0.6 mm; P = .361). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in postoperative IKDC (suture tape vs control: 79.3 vs 79.6; P = .779), Lysholm (87.5 vs 84.3; P = .828), or Tegner activity (5.6 vs 5.7; P = .562) scores. CONCLUSION: All-inside single-bundle PCLR with and without independent suture tape reinforcement demonstrated low rates of graft failure, complications, and reoperations, with satisfactory PROs at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic posterior tibial translation was comparable between the 2 groups. SAGE Publications 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9720802/ /pubmed/36479468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221137357 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Therrien, Erik
Pareek, Ayoosh
Song, Bryant M.
Wilbur, Ryan R.
Till, Sara E.
Krych, Aaron J.
Stuart, Michael J.
Levy, Bruce A.
Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement
title Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement
title_full Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement
title_fullStr Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement
title_short Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement
title_sort comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an all-inside technique with and without independent suture tape reinforcement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221137357
work_keys_str_mv AT therrienerik comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement
AT pareekayoosh comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement
AT songbryantm comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement
AT wilburryanr comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement
AT tillsarae comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement
AT krychaaronj comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement
AT stuartmichaelj comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement
AT levybrucea comparisonofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusinganallinsidetechniquewithandwithoutindependentsuturetapereinforcement