Cargando…

The Compassionate Communities Connectors model for end-of-life care: implementation and evaluation

OBJECTIVES: This pilot project aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a model of care delivered by community volunteers, called Compassionate Communities Connectors. The Connectors’ principal task was to support people living with advanced life-limiting illnesses or palliative care needs by enhanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoun, Samar M., Richmond, Robyn, Gunton, Kerry, Noonan, Kerrie, Abel, Julian, Rumbold, Bruce
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36478890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524221139655
_version_ 1784843633194696704
author Aoun, Samar M.
Richmond, Robyn
Gunton, Kerry
Noonan, Kerrie
Abel, Julian
Rumbold, Bruce
author_facet Aoun, Samar M.
Richmond, Robyn
Gunton, Kerry
Noonan, Kerrie
Abel, Julian
Rumbold, Bruce
author_sort Aoun, Samar M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This pilot project aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a model of care delivered by community volunteers, called Compassionate Communities Connectors. The Connectors’ principal task was to support people living with advanced life-limiting illnesses or palliative care needs by enhancing their supportive networks with Caring Helpers enlisted from the local community. METHODS: The project was undertaken in Western Australia, 2020–2022. A mixed methods research design incorporated a prospective cohort longitudinal design with two cross-sectional measurements, pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome was the effect of the intervention on social connectedness. Secondary outcomes were the effect of the intervention on unmet practical or social needs and support from social networks, and the self-reported impact of the programme on social wellbeing such as coping with daily activities, access to formal services, community links, social activity and reducing social isolation. RESULTS: Twenty Connectors were trained but 13 participated; 43 patients participated but 30 completed the study. Over half of these patients lived alone and 80% of their needs were in the social domain. There were significant improvements in social connectedness, reflected in reduced social isolation, better coping with daily activities and a two-fold increase in supportive networks. The programme was able to address gaps that formal services could not, particularly for people who lived alone, or were socially isolated in more rural communities that are out of the frequent reach of formal services. CONCLUSIONS: This project led to an ongoing programme that has been incorporated by the health service as ‘business as usual’, demonstrating rapid translation into practice. It has laid solid grounds for community capacity building with successful measurable outcomes in line with reports on similar programmes. Ongoing work is focused on replication in other communities to help them establish a similar model of care that better integrates formal and informal networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9720808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97208082022-12-06 The Compassionate Communities Connectors model for end-of-life care: implementation and evaluation Aoun, Samar M. Richmond, Robyn Gunton, Kerry Noonan, Kerrie Abel, Julian Rumbold, Bruce Palliat Care Soc Pract Original Research OBJECTIVES: This pilot project aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a model of care delivered by community volunteers, called Compassionate Communities Connectors. The Connectors’ principal task was to support people living with advanced life-limiting illnesses or palliative care needs by enhancing their supportive networks with Caring Helpers enlisted from the local community. METHODS: The project was undertaken in Western Australia, 2020–2022. A mixed methods research design incorporated a prospective cohort longitudinal design with two cross-sectional measurements, pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome was the effect of the intervention on social connectedness. Secondary outcomes were the effect of the intervention on unmet practical or social needs and support from social networks, and the self-reported impact of the programme on social wellbeing such as coping with daily activities, access to formal services, community links, social activity and reducing social isolation. RESULTS: Twenty Connectors were trained but 13 participated; 43 patients participated but 30 completed the study. Over half of these patients lived alone and 80% of their needs were in the social domain. There were significant improvements in social connectedness, reflected in reduced social isolation, better coping with daily activities and a two-fold increase in supportive networks. The programme was able to address gaps that formal services could not, particularly for people who lived alone, or were socially isolated in more rural communities that are out of the frequent reach of formal services. CONCLUSIONS: This project led to an ongoing programme that has been incorporated by the health service as ‘business as usual’, demonstrating rapid translation into practice. It has laid solid grounds for community capacity building with successful measurable outcomes in line with reports on similar programmes. Ongoing work is focused on replication in other communities to help them establish a similar model of care that better integrates formal and informal networks. SAGE Publications 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9720808/ /pubmed/36478890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524221139655 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Aoun, Samar M.
Richmond, Robyn
Gunton, Kerry
Noonan, Kerrie
Abel, Julian
Rumbold, Bruce
The Compassionate Communities Connectors model for end-of-life care: implementation and evaluation
title The Compassionate Communities Connectors model for end-of-life care: implementation and evaluation
title_full The Compassionate Communities Connectors model for end-of-life care: implementation and evaluation
title_fullStr The Compassionate Communities Connectors model for end-of-life care: implementation and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The Compassionate Communities Connectors model for end-of-life care: implementation and evaluation
title_short The Compassionate Communities Connectors model for end-of-life care: implementation and evaluation
title_sort compassionate communities connectors model for end-of-life care: implementation and evaluation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36478890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524221139655
work_keys_str_mv AT aounsamarm thecompassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation
AT richmondrobyn thecompassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation
AT guntonkerry thecompassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation
AT noonankerrie thecompassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation
AT abeljulian thecompassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation
AT rumboldbruce thecompassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation
AT aounsamarm compassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation
AT richmondrobyn compassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation
AT guntonkerry compassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation
AT noonankerrie compassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation
AT abeljulian compassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation
AT rumboldbruce compassionatecommunitiesconnectorsmodelforendoflifecareimplementationandevaluation