Cargando…
Has the concept of systems consolidation outlived its usefulness? Identification and evaluation of premises underlying systems consolidation
Systems consolidation has mostly been treated as a neural construct defined by the time-dependent change in memory representation from the hippocampus (HPC) to other structures, primarily the neocortex. Here, we identify and evaluate the explicit and implicit premises that underlie traditional or st...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculty Opinions Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532709 http://dx.doi.org/10.12703/r/11-33 |
_version_ | 1784843646797873152 |
---|---|
author | Moscovitch, Morris Gilboa, Asaf |
author_facet | Moscovitch, Morris Gilboa, Asaf |
author_sort | Moscovitch, Morris |
collection | PubMed |
description | Systems consolidation has mostly been treated as a neural construct defined by the time-dependent change in memory representation from the hippocampus (HPC) to other structures, primarily the neocortex. Here, we identify and evaluate the explicit and implicit premises that underlie traditional or standard models and theories of systems consolidation based on evidence from research on humans and other animals. We use the principle that changes in neural representation over time and experience are accompanied by corresponding changes in psychological representations, and vice versa, to argue that each of the premises underlying traditional or standard models and theories of systems consolidation is found wanting. One solution is to modify or abandon the premises or theories and models. This is reflected in moderated models of systems consolidation that emphasize the early role of the HPC in training neocortical memories until they stabilize. The fault, however, may lie in the very concept of systems consolidation and its defining feature. We propose that the concept be replaced by one of memory systems reorganization, which does not carry the theoretical baggage of systems consolidation and is flexible enough to capture the dynamic nature of memory from inception to very long-term retention and retrieval at a psychological and neural level. The term “memory system reorganization” implies that memory traces are not fixed, even after they are presumably consolidated. Memories can continue to change as a result of experience and interactions among memory systems across the lifetime. As will become clear, hippocampal training of neocortical memories is only one type of such interaction, and not always the most important one, even at inception. We end by suggesting some principles of memory reorganization that can help guide research on dynamic memory processes that capture corresponding changes in memory at the psychological and neural levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9720899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Faculty Opinions Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97208992022-12-16 Has the concept of systems consolidation outlived its usefulness? Identification and evaluation of premises underlying systems consolidation Moscovitch, Morris Gilboa, Asaf Fac Rev Review Article Systems consolidation has mostly been treated as a neural construct defined by the time-dependent change in memory representation from the hippocampus (HPC) to other structures, primarily the neocortex. Here, we identify and evaluate the explicit and implicit premises that underlie traditional or standard models and theories of systems consolidation based on evidence from research on humans and other animals. We use the principle that changes in neural representation over time and experience are accompanied by corresponding changes in psychological representations, and vice versa, to argue that each of the premises underlying traditional or standard models and theories of systems consolidation is found wanting. One solution is to modify or abandon the premises or theories and models. This is reflected in moderated models of systems consolidation that emphasize the early role of the HPC in training neocortical memories until they stabilize. The fault, however, may lie in the very concept of systems consolidation and its defining feature. We propose that the concept be replaced by one of memory systems reorganization, which does not carry the theoretical baggage of systems consolidation and is flexible enough to capture the dynamic nature of memory from inception to very long-term retention and retrieval at a psychological and neural level. The term “memory system reorganization” implies that memory traces are not fixed, even after they are presumably consolidated. Memories can continue to change as a result of experience and interactions among memory systems across the lifetime. As will become clear, hippocampal training of neocortical memories is only one type of such interaction, and not always the most important one, even at inception. We end by suggesting some principles of memory reorganization that can help guide research on dynamic memory processes that capture corresponding changes in memory at the psychological and neural levels. Faculty Opinions Ltd 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9720899/ /pubmed/36532709 http://dx.doi.org/10.12703/r/11-33 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Moscovitch M et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Moscovitch, Morris Gilboa, Asaf Has the concept of systems consolidation outlived its usefulness? Identification and evaluation of premises underlying systems consolidation |
title | Has the concept of systems consolidation outlived its usefulness? Identification and evaluation of premises underlying systems consolidation |
title_full | Has the concept of systems consolidation outlived its usefulness? Identification and evaluation of premises underlying systems consolidation |
title_fullStr | Has the concept of systems consolidation outlived its usefulness? Identification and evaluation of premises underlying systems consolidation |
title_full_unstemmed | Has the concept of systems consolidation outlived its usefulness? Identification and evaluation of premises underlying systems consolidation |
title_short | Has the concept of systems consolidation outlived its usefulness? Identification and evaluation of premises underlying systems consolidation |
title_sort | has the concept of systems consolidation outlived its usefulness? identification and evaluation of premises underlying systems consolidation |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532709 http://dx.doi.org/10.12703/r/11-33 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moscovitchmorris hastheconceptofsystemsconsolidationoutliveditsusefulnessidentificationandevaluationofpremisesunderlyingsystemsconsolidation AT gilboaasaf hastheconceptofsystemsconsolidationoutliveditsusefulnessidentificationandevaluationofpremisesunderlyingsystemsconsolidation |