Cargando…

Fostering guardians for frontline medical disputes: a government-led medical dispute mediator training program in Taiwan

BACKGROUND: Mediation is increasingly used for medical dispute resolution, and the particularity of such mediation necessitates specialized training. In response to the promotion of compulsory mediation ahead of a legislation in Taiwan, we invited experts with an interdisciplinary team to design a c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Wan-Ting, Huang, Yu-Ying, Chen, Wen-Wen, Liu, Yueh-Ping, Shih, Chung-Liang, Shiao, Yi-Chih, Wang, Chih-Chia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08909-z
_version_ 1784843660933726208
author Chen, Wan-Ting
Huang, Yu-Ying
Chen, Wen-Wen
Liu, Yueh-Ping
Shih, Chung-Liang
Shiao, Yi-Chih
Wang, Chih-Chia
author_facet Chen, Wan-Ting
Huang, Yu-Ying
Chen, Wen-Wen
Liu, Yueh-Ping
Shih, Chung-Liang
Shiao, Yi-Chih
Wang, Chih-Chia
author_sort Chen, Wan-Ting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mediation is increasingly used for medical dispute resolution, and the particularity of such mediation necessitates specialized training. In response to the promotion of compulsory mediation ahead of a legislation in Taiwan, we invited experts with an interdisciplinary team to design a case-based mediator training workshop. Our study aimed to investigate the learning outcomes of trainees and analyze their perspectives. METHODS: We recruited 129 trainees of a non-probability convenience sample who served as mediators or have dealt with medical dispute-related cases to undergo 2.5 h of lectures (introduction; procedure; roles of two mediators; principles and techniques of mediation; dispute arrangement; and issue analysis) and 1.5 h of case-based exercises. An after-class survey was conducted using a 4-point Likert-type scale to evaluate trainees’ viewpoints and learning outcomes. A total of 104 questionnaires were collected (response rate: 80.6%). RESULTS: The professions of the participants were medical (56%), law (16%), and administration and others (28%). Males considered the course more helpful (3.79 vs. 3.63, p = 0.053) and more important (3.88 vs. 3.74, p = 0.042) than did females. Participants with a legal background scored the highest in helpfulness (3.84), followed by medical (3.74) and administrative (3.63) professionals. Medical and administrative professionals scored the highest (3.85) and lowest (3.76), respectively, on importance. Respondents with more than 10 years (3.81) and less than 1 year (3.79) of experience produced higher scores in helpfulness. Respondents with 1–5 years of experience (3.68) were found to be less likely to agree with the practical importance of course content compared with other groups of trainees. Administrative professionals obtained the highest scores (89.68) in written examinations. CONCLUSIONS: There are variations in mediators’ perspectives based on gender, occupation, and work experience. Our nationwide mediation training workshop can be utilized to cultivate capabilities of mediators for handling medical disputes to achieve the goal of non-litigation in medical disputes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08909-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9720959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97209592022-12-06 Fostering guardians for frontline medical disputes: a government-led medical dispute mediator training program in Taiwan Chen, Wan-Ting Huang, Yu-Ying Chen, Wen-Wen Liu, Yueh-Ping Shih, Chung-Liang Shiao, Yi-Chih Wang, Chih-Chia BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Mediation is increasingly used for medical dispute resolution, and the particularity of such mediation necessitates specialized training. In response to the promotion of compulsory mediation ahead of a legislation in Taiwan, we invited experts with an interdisciplinary team to design a case-based mediator training workshop. Our study aimed to investigate the learning outcomes of trainees and analyze their perspectives. METHODS: We recruited 129 trainees of a non-probability convenience sample who served as mediators or have dealt with medical dispute-related cases to undergo 2.5 h of lectures (introduction; procedure; roles of two mediators; principles and techniques of mediation; dispute arrangement; and issue analysis) and 1.5 h of case-based exercises. An after-class survey was conducted using a 4-point Likert-type scale to evaluate trainees’ viewpoints and learning outcomes. A total of 104 questionnaires were collected (response rate: 80.6%). RESULTS: The professions of the participants were medical (56%), law (16%), and administration and others (28%). Males considered the course more helpful (3.79 vs. 3.63, p = 0.053) and more important (3.88 vs. 3.74, p = 0.042) than did females. Participants with a legal background scored the highest in helpfulness (3.84), followed by medical (3.74) and administrative (3.63) professionals. Medical and administrative professionals scored the highest (3.85) and lowest (3.76), respectively, on importance. Respondents with more than 10 years (3.81) and less than 1 year (3.79) of experience produced higher scores in helpfulness. Respondents with 1–5 years of experience (3.68) were found to be less likely to agree with the practical importance of course content compared with other groups of trainees. Administrative professionals obtained the highest scores (89.68) in written examinations. CONCLUSIONS: There are variations in mediators’ perspectives based on gender, occupation, and work experience. Our nationwide mediation training workshop can be utilized to cultivate capabilities of mediators for handling medical disputes to achieve the goal of non-litigation in medical disputes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08909-z. BioMed Central 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9720959/ /pubmed/36471357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08909-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Chen, Wan-Ting
Huang, Yu-Ying
Chen, Wen-Wen
Liu, Yueh-Ping
Shih, Chung-Liang
Shiao, Yi-Chih
Wang, Chih-Chia
Fostering guardians for frontline medical disputes: a government-led medical dispute mediator training program in Taiwan
title Fostering guardians for frontline medical disputes: a government-led medical dispute mediator training program in Taiwan
title_full Fostering guardians for frontline medical disputes: a government-led medical dispute mediator training program in Taiwan
title_fullStr Fostering guardians for frontline medical disputes: a government-led medical dispute mediator training program in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Fostering guardians for frontline medical disputes: a government-led medical dispute mediator training program in Taiwan
title_short Fostering guardians for frontline medical disputes: a government-led medical dispute mediator training program in Taiwan
title_sort fostering guardians for frontline medical disputes: a government-led medical dispute mediator training program in taiwan
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08909-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chenwanting fosteringguardiansforfrontlinemedicaldisputesagovernmentledmedicaldisputemediatortrainingprogramintaiwan
AT huangyuying fosteringguardiansforfrontlinemedicaldisputesagovernmentledmedicaldisputemediatortrainingprogramintaiwan
AT chenwenwen fosteringguardiansforfrontlinemedicaldisputesagovernmentledmedicaldisputemediatortrainingprogramintaiwan
AT liuyuehping fosteringguardiansforfrontlinemedicaldisputesagovernmentledmedicaldisputemediatortrainingprogramintaiwan
AT shihchungliang fosteringguardiansforfrontlinemedicaldisputesagovernmentledmedicaldisputemediatortrainingprogramintaiwan
AT shiaoyichih fosteringguardiansforfrontlinemedicaldisputesagovernmentledmedicaldisputemediatortrainingprogramintaiwan
AT wangchihchia fosteringguardiansforfrontlinemedicaldisputesagovernmentledmedicaldisputemediatortrainingprogramintaiwan