Cargando…
Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae
BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is common in cancer survivorship and is one of the most distressing symptoms for patients previously treated for head and neck cancer. Persistent neuropathic pain, when it is ongoing and uncontrolled, has a detrimental effect and erodes patients’ quality of life. Patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10348-2 |
_version_ | 1784843668500250624 |
---|---|
author | Boden, Antoine Lusque, Amélie Lodin, Sabrina Bourgouin, Marie Mauries, Valérie Moreau, Christelle Fabre, Amandine Mounier, Muriel Poublanc, Muriel Caunes-Hilary, Nathalie Filleron, Thomas |
author_facet | Boden, Antoine Lusque, Amélie Lodin, Sabrina Bourgouin, Marie Mauries, Valérie Moreau, Christelle Fabre, Amandine Mounier, Muriel Poublanc, Muriel Caunes-Hilary, Nathalie Filleron, Thomas |
author_sort | Boden, Antoine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is common in cancer survivorship and is one of the most distressing symptoms for patients previously treated for head and neck cancer. Persistent neuropathic pain, when it is ongoing and uncontrolled, has a detrimental effect and erodes patients’ quality of life. Patients treated for head and neck cancer are chronic opioid users to manage their post-treatment pain, which may entail an increased risk of addiction and overdose. We propose to evaluate the analgesic activity of high-concentration capsaicin patches for the treatment of head and neck cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. METHODS: TEC-ORL is a parallel, multicenter randomized comparative phase II study evaluating whether Capsaïcin patches (Qutenza®) reduce neuropathic pain when compared to Amitriptyline (Laroxyl®) in head and neck cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. The primary efficacy outcome is the rate of patients with a pain reduction of at least two points at 9 months compared to baseline. Assuming that 5% of patients become lost to follow-up, 130 patients will need to be randomized to detect a 25% improvement (i.e., standard: 25%, experimental: 50%) using a one-sided chi-square test with an alpha of 0.05%. According to the recommendations for comparative phase II trials, the target differences and type I error rates are relaxed. Randomized patients will either be treated with a capsaicin 8% (Qutenza®) patch applied at three time intervals in the experimental arm or with Amitriptyline (Laroxyl®) (oral solution 40 mg/ml) taken for 9 months at the recommended daily dose of 25 mg to 75 mg in the control arm. DISCUSSION: TEC-ORL is a randomized comparative phase II trial designed to comprehensively evaluate the analgesic activity of capsaicin compared to Laroxyl in Head and Neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04704453 Date of registration: 2021/01/13. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9720988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97209882022-12-06 Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae Boden, Antoine Lusque, Amélie Lodin, Sabrina Bourgouin, Marie Mauries, Valérie Moreau, Christelle Fabre, Amandine Mounier, Muriel Poublanc, Muriel Caunes-Hilary, Nathalie Filleron, Thomas BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is common in cancer survivorship and is one of the most distressing symptoms for patients previously treated for head and neck cancer. Persistent neuropathic pain, when it is ongoing and uncontrolled, has a detrimental effect and erodes patients’ quality of life. Patients treated for head and neck cancer are chronic opioid users to manage their post-treatment pain, which may entail an increased risk of addiction and overdose. We propose to evaluate the analgesic activity of high-concentration capsaicin patches for the treatment of head and neck cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. METHODS: TEC-ORL is a parallel, multicenter randomized comparative phase II study evaluating whether Capsaïcin patches (Qutenza®) reduce neuropathic pain when compared to Amitriptyline (Laroxyl®) in head and neck cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. The primary efficacy outcome is the rate of patients with a pain reduction of at least two points at 9 months compared to baseline. Assuming that 5% of patients become lost to follow-up, 130 patients will need to be randomized to detect a 25% improvement (i.e., standard: 25%, experimental: 50%) using a one-sided chi-square test with an alpha of 0.05%. According to the recommendations for comparative phase II trials, the target differences and type I error rates are relaxed. Randomized patients will either be treated with a capsaicin 8% (Qutenza®) patch applied at three time intervals in the experimental arm or with Amitriptyline (Laroxyl®) (oral solution 40 mg/ml) taken for 9 months at the recommended daily dose of 25 mg to 75 mg in the control arm. DISCUSSION: TEC-ORL is a randomized comparative phase II trial designed to comprehensively evaluate the analgesic activity of capsaicin compared to Laroxyl in Head and Neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04704453 Date of registration: 2021/01/13. BioMed Central 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9720988/ /pubmed/36471253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10348-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Boden, Antoine Lusque, Amélie Lodin, Sabrina Bourgouin, Marie Mauries, Valérie Moreau, Christelle Fabre, Amandine Mounier, Muriel Poublanc, Muriel Caunes-Hilary, Nathalie Filleron, Thomas Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae |
title | Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae |
title_full | Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae |
title_fullStr | Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae |
title_full_unstemmed | Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae |
title_short | Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae |
title_sort | study protocol of the tec-orl clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase ii trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs laroxyl in head and neck cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10348-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bodenantoine studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae AT lusqueamelie studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae AT lodinsabrina studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae AT bourgouinmarie studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae AT mauriesvalerie studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae AT moreauchristelle studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae AT fabreamandine studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae AT mouniermuriel studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae AT poublancmuriel studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae AT cauneshilarynathalie studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae AT filleronthomas studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae |