Cargando…

Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is common in cancer survivorship and is one of the most distressing symptoms for patients previously treated for head and neck cancer. Persistent neuropathic pain, when it is ongoing and uncontrolled, has a detrimental effect and erodes patients’ quality of life. Patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boden, Antoine, Lusque, Amélie, Lodin, Sabrina, Bourgouin, Marie, Mauries, Valérie, Moreau, Christelle, Fabre, Amandine, Mounier, Muriel, Poublanc, Muriel, Caunes-Hilary, Nathalie, Filleron, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10348-2
_version_ 1784843668500250624
author Boden, Antoine
Lusque, Amélie
Lodin, Sabrina
Bourgouin, Marie
Mauries, Valérie
Moreau, Christelle
Fabre, Amandine
Mounier, Muriel
Poublanc, Muriel
Caunes-Hilary, Nathalie
Filleron, Thomas
author_facet Boden, Antoine
Lusque, Amélie
Lodin, Sabrina
Bourgouin, Marie
Mauries, Valérie
Moreau, Christelle
Fabre, Amandine
Mounier, Muriel
Poublanc, Muriel
Caunes-Hilary, Nathalie
Filleron, Thomas
author_sort Boden, Antoine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is common in cancer survivorship and is one of the most distressing symptoms for patients previously treated for head and neck cancer. Persistent neuropathic pain, when it is ongoing and uncontrolled, has a detrimental effect and erodes patients’ quality of life. Patients treated for head and neck cancer are chronic opioid users to manage their post-treatment pain, which may entail an increased risk of addiction and overdose. We propose to evaluate the analgesic activity of high-concentration capsaicin patches for the treatment of head and neck cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. METHODS: TEC-ORL is a parallel, multicenter randomized comparative phase II study evaluating whether Capsaïcin patches (Qutenza®) reduce neuropathic pain when compared to Amitriptyline (Laroxyl®) in head and neck cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. The primary efficacy outcome is the rate of patients with a pain reduction of at least two points at 9 months compared to baseline. Assuming that 5% of patients become lost to follow-up, 130 patients will need to be randomized to detect a 25% improvement (i.e., standard: 25%, experimental: 50%) using a one-sided chi-square test with an alpha of 0.05%. According to the recommendations for comparative phase II trials, the target differences and type I error rates are relaxed. Randomized patients will either be treated with a capsaicin 8% (Qutenza®) patch applied at three time intervals in the experimental arm or with Amitriptyline (Laroxyl®) (oral solution 40 mg/ml) taken for 9 months at the recommended daily dose of 25 mg to 75 mg in the control arm. DISCUSSION: TEC-ORL is a randomized comparative phase II trial designed to comprehensively evaluate the analgesic activity of capsaicin compared to Laroxyl in Head and Neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04704453 Date of registration: 2021/01/13.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9720988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97209882022-12-06 Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae Boden, Antoine Lusque, Amélie Lodin, Sabrina Bourgouin, Marie Mauries, Valérie Moreau, Christelle Fabre, Amandine Mounier, Muriel Poublanc, Muriel Caunes-Hilary, Nathalie Filleron, Thomas BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is common in cancer survivorship and is one of the most distressing symptoms for patients previously treated for head and neck cancer. Persistent neuropathic pain, when it is ongoing and uncontrolled, has a detrimental effect and erodes patients’ quality of life. Patients treated for head and neck cancer are chronic opioid users to manage their post-treatment pain, which may entail an increased risk of addiction and overdose. We propose to evaluate the analgesic activity of high-concentration capsaicin patches for the treatment of head and neck cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. METHODS: TEC-ORL is a parallel, multicenter randomized comparative phase II study evaluating whether Capsaïcin patches (Qutenza®) reduce neuropathic pain when compared to Amitriptyline (Laroxyl®) in head and neck cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. The primary efficacy outcome is the rate of patients with a pain reduction of at least two points at 9 months compared to baseline. Assuming that 5% of patients become lost to follow-up, 130 patients will need to be randomized to detect a 25% improvement (i.e., standard: 25%, experimental: 50%) using a one-sided chi-square test with an alpha of 0.05%. According to the recommendations for comparative phase II trials, the target differences and type I error rates are relaxed. Randomized patients will either be treated with a capsaicin 8% (Qutenza®) patch applied at three time intervals in the experimental arm or with Amitriptyline (Laroxyl®) (oral solution 40 mg/ml) taken for 9 months at the recommended daily dose of 25 mg to 75 mg in the control arm. DISCUSSION: TEC-ORL is a randomized comparative phase II trial designed to comprehensively evaluate the analgesic activity of capsaicin compared to Laroxyl in Head and Neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04704453 Date of registration: 2021/01/13. BioMed Central 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9720988/ /pubmed/36471253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10348-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Boden, Antoine
Lusque, Amélie
Lodin, Sabrina
Bourgouin, Marie
Mauries, Valérie
Moreau, Christelle
Fabre, Amandine
Mounier, Muriel
Poublanc, Muriel
Caunes-Hilary, Nathalie
Filleron, Thomas
Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae
title Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae
title_full Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae
title_fullStr Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae
title_short Study protocol of the TEC-ORL clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase II trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs Laroxyl in head and neck Cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae
title_sort study protocol of the tec-orl clinical trial: a randomized comparative phase ii trial investigating the analgesic activity of capsaicin vs laroxyl in head and neck cancer survivors presenting with neuropathic pain sequelae
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10348-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bodenantoine studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae
AT lusqueamelie studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae
AT lodinsabrina studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae
AT bourgouinmarie studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae
AT mauriesvalerie studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae
AT moreauchristelle studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae
AT fabreamandine studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae
AT mouniermuriel studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae
AT poublancmuriel studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae
AT cauneshilarynathalie studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae
AT filleronthomas studyprotocolofthetecorlclinicaltrialarandomizedcomparativephaseiitrialinvestigatingtheanalgesicactivityofcapsaicinvslaroxylinheadandneckcancersurvivorspresentingwithneuropathicpainsequelae