Cargando…

Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation

BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinical application of modified Crain classification in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with remnant preservation. METHODS: The subjects were 70 patients with ACL injury who underwent ACLR from May 2016 to June 2018, and their general data were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zheng, Tao, Hai-bing, Wang, Yu, Liu, Bin, Han, Wen-feng, Xiang, Liang-bi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9721086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05912-7
_version_ 1784843693827555328
author Wang, Zheng
Tao, Hai-bing
Wang, Yu
Liu, Bin
Han, Wen-feng
Xiang, Liang-bi
author_facet Wang, Zheng
Tao, Hai-bing
Wang, Yu
Liu, Bin
Han, Wen-feng
Xiang, Liang-bi
author_sort Wang, Zheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinical application of modified Crain classification in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with remnant preservation. METHODS: The subjects were 70 patients with ACL injury who underwent ACLR from May 2016 to June 2018, and their general data were recorded. They were randomly divided into modified remnant-preserved ACLR group (group M, n = 35) and non remnant-preserved ACLR group (group N, n = 35). ACLR program with remnant preservation was designed based on modified Crain classification in group M, while ACL remnants were completely cleaned during ACLR in group N. Subsequently, the two groups were compared in terms of operation time, complications, as well as Lysholm score, international knee documentation committee (IKDC) score and positive rate of Lachman test of knee joint before operation and at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation. RESULTS: Both the groups showed good postoperative efficacy, and none had complications like limited knee extension or cyclops lesion. The comparison results found that group M (72.49 ± 7.64 min) required longer operation time than group N (66.06 ± 6.37 min) (P < 0.05). Lysholm score and IKDC score at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation in the two groups were significantly higher than those before operation (P < 0.05); group M had higher Lysholm score and IKDC score at 3 months and 6 months after operation compared with group N (P < 0.05). Additionally, the positive rate of Lachman test at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation in both groups was significantly lower than that before operation (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between group M and group N. CONCLUSION: With the modified Crain classification, many remnant-preserved reconstruction techniques can be rationally used to completely preserve the remnant ligament tissue during operation and improve knee joint function and joint stability with few complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9721086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97210862022-12-06 Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation Wang, Zheng Tao, Hai-bing Wang, Yu Liu, Bin Han, Wen-feng Xiang, Liang-bi BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinical application of modified Crain classification in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with remnant preservation. METHODS: The subjects were 70 patients with ACL injury who underwent ACLR from May 2016 to June 2018, and their general data were recorded. They were randomly divided into modified remnant-preserved ACLR group (group M, n = 35) and non remnant-preserved ACLR group (group N, n = 35). ACLR program with remnant preservation was designed based on modified Crain classification in group M, while ACL remnants were completely cleaned during ACLR in group N. Subsequently, the two groups were compared in terms of operation time, complications, as well as Lysholm score, international knee documentation committee (IKDC) score and positive rate of Lachman test of knee joint before operation and at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation. RESULTS: Both the groups showed good postoperative efficacy, and none had complications like limited knee extension or cyclops lesion. The comparison results found that group M (72.49 ± 7.64 min) required longer operation time than group N (66.06 ± 6.37 min) (P < 0.05). Lysholm score and IKDC score at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation in the two groups were significantly higher than those before operation (P < 0.05); group M had higher Lysholm score and IKDC score at 3 months and 6 months after operation compared with group N (P < 0.05). Additionally, the positive rate of Lachman test at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation in both groups was significantly lower than that before operation (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between group M and group N. CONCLUSION: With the modified Crain classification, many remnant-preserved reconstruction techniques can be rationally used to completely preserve the remnant ligament tissue during operation and improve knee joint function and joint stability with few complications. BioMed Central 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9721086/ /pubmed/36471273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05912-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Zheng
Tao, Hai-bing
Wang, Yu
Liu, Bin
Han, Wen-feng
Xiang, Liang-bi
Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation
title Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation
title_full Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation
title_fullStr Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation
title_full_unstemmed Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation
title_short Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation
title_sort clinical application of modified crain classification in the design of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9721086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05912-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzheng clinicalapplicationofmodifiedcrainclassificationinthedesignofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithremnantpreservation
AT taohaibing clinicalapplicationofmodifiedcrainclassificationinthedesignofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithremnantpreservation
AT wangyu clinicalapplicationofmodifiedcrainclassificationinthedesignofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithremnantpreservation
AT liubin clinicalapplicationofmodifiedcrainclassificationinthedesignofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithremnantpreservation
AT hanwenfeng clinicalapplicationofmodifiedcrainclassificationinthedesignofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithremnantpreservation
AT xiangliangbi clinicalapplicationofmodifiedcrainclassificationinthedesignofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithremnantpreservation