Cargando…
Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study
BACKGROUND: The closure of childcare organizations (e.g. schools, childcare centers, afterschool programs, summer camps) during the Covid-19 pandemic impacted the health and wellbeing of families. Despite their reopening, parents may be reluctant to enroll their children in summer programming. Knowl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9721268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102200 |
_version_ | 1784843736930320384 |
---|---|
author | Dugger, Roddrick Reesor-Oyer, Layton. Beets, Michael W. Wilson, Dawn K. Weaver, Robert Glenn |
author_facet | Dugger, Roddrick Reesor-Oyer, Layton. Beets, Michael W. Wilson, Dawn K. Weaver, Robert Glenn |
author_sort | Dugger, Roddrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The closure of childcare organizations (e.g. schools, childcare centers, afterschool programs, summer camps) during the Covid-19 pandemic impacted the health and wellbeing of families. Despite their reopening, parents may be reluctant to enroll their children in summer programming. Knowledge of the beliefs that underlie parental concerns will inform best practices for organizations that serve children. METHODS: Parents (n = 17) participated in qualitative interviews (October 2020) to discuss Covid-19 risk perceptions and summer program enrollment intentions. Based on interview responses to perceived Covid-19 risk, two groups emerged for analysis- “Elevated Risk (ER)” and “Conditional Risk (CR)”. Themes were identified utilizing independent coding and constant-comparison analysis. Follow-up interviews (n = 12) in the Spring of 2021 evaluated the impact of vaccine availability on parent risk perceptions. Additionally, parents (n = 17) completed the Covid-19 Impact survey to assess perceived exposure (Range: 0–25) and household impact (Range: 2–60) of the pandemic. Scores were summed and averaged for the sample and by risk classification group. RESULTS: Parents overwhelmingly supported the operation of summer programming during the pandemic due to perceived child benefits. Parent willingness to enroll their children in summer programming evolved with time and was contingent upon the successful implementation of safety precautions (e.g. outdoor activities, increased handwashing/sanitizing of surfaces). Interestingly, parents indicated low exposure (ER: Avg. 6.3 ± 3.1 Range [2–12], CR: Avg. 7.5 ± 3.6 Range [1–14]) and moderate family impact (ER: Avg. 27.1 ± 6.9 Range [20–36], CR: Avg. 33.7 ± 11.4 Range [9–48]) on the impact survey. CONCLUSION: Childcare organizations should mandate and evaluate the implementation of desired Covid-19 safety precautions for their patrons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9721268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97212682022-12-06 Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study Dugger, Roddrick Reesor-Oyer, Layton. Beets, Michael W. Wilson, Dawn K. Weaver, Robert Glenn Eval Program Plann Article BACKGROUND: The closure of childcare organizations (e.g. schools, childcare centers, afterschool programs, summer camps) during the Covid-19 pandemic impacted the health and wellbeing of families. Despite their reopening, parents may be reluctant to enroll their children in summer programming. Knowledge of the beliefs that underlie parental concerns will inform best practices for organizations that serve children. METHODS: Parents (n = 17) participated in qualitative interviews (October 2020) to discuss Covid-19 risk perceptions and summer program enrollment intentions. Based on interview responses to perceived Covid-19 risk, two groups emerged for analysis- “Elevated Risk (ER)” and “Conditional Risk (CR)”. Themes were identified utilizing independent coding and constant-comparison analysis. Follow-up interviews (n = 12) in the Spring of 2021 evaluated the impact of vaccine availability on parent risk perceptions. Additionally, parents (n = 17) completed the Covid-19 Impact survey to assess perceived exposure (Range: 0–25) and household impact (Range: 2–60) of the pandemic. Scores were summed and averaged for the sample and by risk classification group. RESULTS: Parents overwhelmingly supported the operation of summer programming during the pandemic due to perceived child benefits. Parent willingness to enroll their children in summer programming evolved with time and was contingent upon the successful implementation of safety precautions (e.g. outdoor activities, increased handwashing/sanitizing of surfaces). Interestingly, parents indicated low exposure (ER: Avg. 6.3 ± 3.1 Range [2–12], CR: Avg. 7.5 ± 3.6 Range [1–14]) and moderate family impact (ER: Avg. 27.1 ± 6.9 Range [20–36], CR: Avg. 33.7 ± 11.4 Range [9–48]) on the impact survey. CONCLUSION: Childcare organizations should mandate and evaluate the implementation of desired Covid-19 safety precautions for their patrons. Elsevier Ltd. 2023-04 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9721268/ /pubmed/36527887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102200 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Dugger, Roddrick Reesor-Oyer, Layton. Beets, Michael W. Wilson, Dawn K. Weaver, Robert Glenn Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study |
title | Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study |
title_full | Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study |
title_fullStr | Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study |
title_full_unstemmed | Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study |
title_short | Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study |
title_sort | parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: a mixed methods covid-19 impact study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9721268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duggerroddrick parentaldecisionmakingonsummerprogramenrollmentamixedmethodscovid19impactstudy AT reesoroyerlayton parentaldecisionmakingonsummerprogramenrollmentamixedmethodscovid19impactstudy AT beetsmichaelw parentaldecisionmakingonsummerprogramenrollmentamixedmethodscovid19impactstudy AT wilsondawnk parentaldecisionmakingonsummerprogramenrollmentamixedmethodscovid19impactstudy AT weaverrobertglenn parentaldecisionmakingonsummerprogramenrollmentamixedmethodscovid19impactstudy |