Cargando…

Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study

BACKGROUND: The closure of childcare organizations (e.g. schools, childcare centers, afterschool programs, summer camps) during the Covid-19 pandemic impacted the health and wellbeing of families. Despite their reopening, parents may be reluctant to enroll their children in summer programming. Knowl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dugger, Roddrick, Reesor-Oyer, Layton., Beets, Michael W., Wilson, Dawn K., Weaver, Robert Glenn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9721268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102200
_version_ 1784843736930320384
author Dugger, Roddrick
Reesor-Oyer, Layton.
Beets, Michael W.
Wilson, Dawn K.
Weaver, Robert Glenn
author_facet Dugger, Roddrick
Reesor-Oyer, Layton.
Beets, Michael W.
Wilson, Dawn K.
Weaver, Robert Glenn
author_sort Dugger, Roddrick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The closure of childcare organizations (e.g. schools, childcare centers, afterschool programs, summer camps) during the Covid-19 pandemic impacted the health and wellbeing of families. Despite their reopening, parents may be reluctant to enroll their children in summer programming. Knowledge of the beliefs that underlie parental concerns will inform best practices for organizations that serve children. METHODS: Parents (n = 17) participated in qualitative interviews (October 2020) to discuss Covid-19 risk perceptions and summer program enrollment intentions. Based on interview responses to perceived Covid-19 risk, two groups emerged for analysis- “Elevated Risk (ER)” and “Conditional Risk (CR)”. Themes were identified utilizing independent coding and constant-comparison analysis. Follow-up interviews (n = 12) in the Spring of 2021 evaluated the impact of vaccine availability on parent risk perceptions. Additionally, parents (n = 17) completed the Covid-19 Impact survey to assess perceived exposure (Range: 0–25) and household impact (Range: 2–60) of the pandemic. Scores were summed and averaged for the sample and by risk classification group. RESULTS: Parents overwhelmingly supported the operation of summer programming during the pandemic due to perceived child benefits. Parent willingness to enroll their children in summer programming evolved with time and was contingent upon the successful implementation of safety precautions (e.g. outdoor activities, increased handwashing/sanitizing of surfaces). Interestingly, parents indicated low exposure (ER: Avg. 6.3 ± 3.1 Range [2–12], CR: Avg. 7.5 ± 3.6 Range [1–14]) and moderate family impact (ER: Avg. 27.1 ± 6.9 Range [20–36], CR: Avg. 33.7 ± 11.4 Range [9–48]) on the impact survey. CONCLUSION: Childcare organizations should mandate and evaluate the implementation of desired Covid-19 safety precautions for their patrons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9721268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97212682022-12-06 Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study Dugger, Roddrick Reesor-Oyer, Layton. Beets, Michael W. Wilson, Dawn K. Weaver, Robert Glenn Eval Program Plann Article BACKGROUND: The closure of childcare organizations (e.g. schools, childcare centers, afterschool programs, summer camps) during the Covid-19 pandemic impacted the health and wellbeing of families. Despite their reopening, parents may be reluctant to enroll their children in summer programming. Knowledge of the beliefs that underlie parental concerns will inform best practices for organizations that serve children. METHODS: Parents (n = 17) participated in qualitative interviews (October 2020) to discuss Covid-19 risk perceptions and summer program enrollment intentions. Based on interview responses to perceived Covid-19 risk, two groups emerged for analysis- “Elevated Risk (ER)” and “Conditional Risk (CR)”. Themes were identified utilizing independent coding and constant-comparison analysis. Follow-up interviews (n = 12) in the Spring of 2021 evaluated the impact of vaccine availability on parent risk perceptions. Additionally, parents (n = 17) completed the Covid-19 Impact survey to assess perceived exposure (Range: 0–25) and household impact (Range: 2–60) of the pandemic. Scores were summed and averaged for the sample and by risk classification group. RESULTS: Parents overwhelmingly supported the operation of summer programming during the pandemic due to perceived child benefits. Parent willingness to enroll their children in summer programming evolved with time and was contingent upon the successful implementation of safety precautions (e.g. outdoor activities, increased handwashing/sanitizing of surfaces). Interestingly, parents indicated low exposure (ER: Avg. 6.3 ± 3.1 Range [2–12], CR: Avg. 7.5 ± 3.6 Range [1–14]) and moderate family impact (ER: Avg. 27.1 ± 6.9 Range [20–36], CR: Avg. 33.7 ± 11.4 Range [9–48]) on the impact survey. CONCLUSION: Childcare organizations should mandate and evaluate the implementation of desired Covid-19 safety precautions for their patrons. Elsevier Ltd. 2023-04 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9721268/ /pubmed/36527887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102200 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Dugger, Roddrick
Reesor-Oyer, Layton.
Beets, Michael W.
Wilson, Dawn K.
Weaver, Robert Glenn
Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study
title Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study
title_full Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study
title_fullStr Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study
title_full_unstemmed Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study
title_short Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study
title_sort parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: a mixed methods covid-19 impact study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9721268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102200
work_keys_str_mv AT duggerroddrick parentaldecisionmakingonsummerprogramenrollmentamixedmethodscovid19impactstudy
AT reesoroyerlayton parentaldecisionmakingonsummerprogramenrollmentamixedmethodscovid19impactstudy
AT beetsmichaelw parentaldecisionmakingonsummerprogramenrollmentamixedmethodscovid19impactstudy
AT wilsondawnk parentaldecisionmakingonsummerprogramenrollmentamixedmethodscovid19impactstudy
AT weaverrobertglenn parentaldecisionmakingonsummerprogramenrollmentamixedmethodscovid19impactstudy