Cargando…

Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders

Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) model for routine genomic prediction of breeding values is developed intensively for many dairy cattle populations. Compatibility between the genomic (G) and the pedigree (A) relationship matrices remains an important challenge required in ssGBLUP. The compatibilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kudinov, Andrei A., Koivula, Minna, Aamand, Gert P., Strandén, Ismo, Mäntysaari, Esa A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9721289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479243
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1012205
_version_ 1784843741887987712
author Kudinov, Andrei A.
Koivula, Minna
Aamand, Gert P.
Strandén, Ismo
Mäntysaari, Esa A.
author_facet Kudinov, Andrei A.
Koivula, Minna
Aamand, Gert P.
Strandén, Ismo
Mäntysaari, Esa A.
author_sort Kudinov, Andrei A.
collection PubMed
description Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) model for routine genomic prediction of breeding values is developed intensively for many dairy cattle populations. Compatibility between the genomic (G) and the pedigree (A) relationship matrices remains an important challenge required in ssGBLUP. The compatibility relates to the amount of missing pedigree information. There are two prevailing approaches to account for the incomplete pedigree information: unknown parent groups (UPG) and metafounders (MF). unknown parent groups have been used routinely in pedigree-based evaluations to account for the differences in genetic level between groups of animals with missing parents. The MF approach is an extension of the UPG approach. The MF approach defines MF which are related pseudo-individuals. The MF approach needs a Γ matrix of the size number of MF to describe relationships between MF. The UPG and MF can be the same. However, the challenge in the MF approach is the estimation of Γ having many MF, typically needed in dairy cattle. In our study, we present an approach to fit the same amount of MF as UPG in ssGBLUP with Woodbury matrix identity (ssGTBLUP). We used 305-day milk, protein, and fat yield data from the DFS (Denmark, Finland, Sweden) Red Dairy cattle population. The pedigree had more than 6 million animals of which 207,475 were genotyped. We constructed the preliminary gamma matrix (Γ ( pre )) with 29 MF which was expanded to 148 MF by a covariance function (Γ (148)). The quality of the extrapolation of the Γ ( pre ) matrix was studied by comparing average off-diagonal elements between breed groups. On average relationships among MF in [Formula: see text] were 1.8% higher than in Γ ( pre ). The use of Γ (148) increased the correlation between the G and A matrices by 0.13 and 0.11 for the diagonal and off-diagonal elements, respectively. [G]EBV were predicted using the ssGTBLUP and Pedigree-BLUP models with the MF and UPG. The prediction reliabilities were slightly higher for the ssGTBLUP model using MF than UPG. The ssGBLUP MF model showed less overprediction compared to other models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9721289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97212892022-12-06 Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders Kudinov, Andrei A. Koivula, Minna Aamand, Gert P. Strandén, Ismo Mäntysaari, Esa A. Front Genet Genetics Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) model for routine genomic prediction of breeding values is developed intensively for many dairy cattle populations. Compatibility between the genomic (G) and the pedigree (A) relationship matrices remains an important challenge required in ssGBLUP. The compatibility relates to the amount of missing pedigree information. There are two prevailing approaches to account for the incomplete pedigree information: unknown parent groups (UPG) and metafounders (MF). unknown parent groups have been used routinely in pedigree-based evaluations to account for the differences in genetic level between groups of animals with missing parents. The MF approach is an extension of the UPG approach. The MF approach defines MF which are related pseudo-individuals. The MF approach needs a Γ matrix of the size number of MF to describe relationships between MF. The UPG and MF can be the same. However, the challenge in the MF approach is the estimation of Γ having many MF, typically needed in dairy cattle. In our study, we present an approach to fit the same amount of MF as UPG in ssGBLUP with Woodbury matrix identity (ssGTBLUP). We used 305-day milk, protein, and fat yield data from the DFS (Denmark, Finland, Sweden) Red Dairy cattle population. The pedigree had more than 6 million animals of which 207,475 were genotyped. We constructed the preliminary gamma matrix (Γ ( pre )) with 29 MF which was expanded to 148 MF by a covariance function (Γ (148)). The quality of the extrapolation of the Γ ( pre ) matrix was studied by comparing average off-diagonal elements between breed groups. On average relationships among MF in [Formula: see text] were 1.8% higher than in Γ ( pre ). The use of Γ (148) increased the correlation between the G and A matrices by 0.13 and 0.11 for the diagonal and off-diagonal elements, respectively. [G]EBV were predicted using the ssGTBLUP and Pedigree-BLUP models with the MF and UPG. The prediction reliabilities were slightly higher for the ssGTBLUP model using MF than UPG. The ssGBLUP MF model showed less overprediction compared to other models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9721289/ /pubmed/36479243 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1012205 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kudinov, Koivula, Aamand, Strandén and Mäntysaari. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Kudinov, Andrei A.
Koivula, Minna
Aamand, Gert P.
Strandén, Ismo
Mäntysaari, Esa A.
Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders
title Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders
title_full Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders
title_fullStr Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders
title_full_unstemmed Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders
title_short Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders
title_sort single-step genomic blup with many metafounders
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9721289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479243
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1012205
work_keys_str_mv AT kudinovandreia singlestepgenomicblupwithmanymetafounders
AT koivulaminna singlestepgenomicblupwithmanymetafounders
AT aamandgertp singlestepgenomicblupwithmanymetafounders
AT strandenismo singlestepgenomicblupwithmanymetafounders
AT mantysaariesaa singlestepgenomicblupwithmanymetafounders