Cargando…
Quality criteria in MOOC: Comparative and proposed indicators
The MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) offer revolution requires processes that can define their quality, especially due to the number of courses offered, as well as the high number of students enrolled in them. The objective of this study is to identify the main requirements and indicators of the MO...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9721481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36469511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278519 |
_version_ | 1784843785583198208 |
---|---|
author | Ferreira, Camino Arias, Ana R. Vidal, Javier |
author_facet | Ferreira, Camino Arias, Ana R. Vidal, Javier |
author_sort | Ferreira, Camino |
collection | PubMed |
description | The MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) offer revolution requires processes that can define their quality, especially due to the number of courses offered, as well as the high number of students enrolled in them. The objective of this study is to identify the main requirements and indicators of the MOOC following the ENQA (The European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education) considerations. To establish this system, the study has been carried out through the Delphi method with successive rounds of application from the systematic use of expert judgment. This method has been applied to achieve consensus on a set of requirements and indicators of 20 experts from eight different institutions in the field of application and development of MOOCs that assessed the indicators according to the quality criteria according to three aspects: relevance, feasibility, and comparability. Therefore, the outcome of this study is a system as a mechanism for the university to approve or disapprove a MOOC (checklist) and assess its quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9721481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97214812022-12-06 Quality criteria in MOOC: Comparative and proposed indicators Ferreira, Camino Arias, Ana R. Vidal, Javier PLoS One Research Article The MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) offer revolution requires processes that can define their quality, especially due to the number of courses offered, as well as the high number of students enrolled in them. The objective of this study is to identify the main requirements and indicators of the MOOC following the ENQA (The European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education) considerations. To establish this system, the study has been carried out through the Delphi method with successive rounds of application from the systematic use of expert judgment. This method has been applied to achieve consensus on a set of requirements and indicators of 20 experts from eight different institutions in the field of application and development of MOOCs that assessed the indicators according to the quality criteria according to three aspects: relevance, feasibility, and comparability. Therefore, the outcome of this study is a system as a mechanism for the university to approve or disapprove a MOOC (checklist) and assess its quality. Public Library of Science 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9721481/ /pubmed/36469511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278519 Text en © 2022 Ferreira et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ferreira, Camino Arias, Ana R. Vidal, Javier Quality criteria in MOOC: Comparative and proposed indicators |
title | Quality criteria in MOOC: Comparative and proposed indicators |
title_full | Quality criteria in MOOC: Comparative and proposed indicators |
title_fullStr | Quality criteria in MOOC: Comparative and proposed indicators |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality criteria in MOOC: Comparative and proposed indicators |
title_short | Quality criteria in MOOC: Comparative and proposed indicators |
title_sort | quality criteria in mooc: comparative and proposed indicators |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9721481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36469511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferreiracamino qualitycriteriainmooccomparativeandproposedindicators AT ariasanar qualitycriteriainmooccomparativeandproposedindicators AT vidaljavier qualitycriteriainmooccomparativeandproposedindicators |