Cargando…

Secondary analysis of a university‐based weight loss program in on‐campus versus off‐campus employees

INTRODUCTION: Many barriers prevent individuals from regularly engaging in physical activity (PA), including lack of time and access to facilities. Providing free gym membership close to one's work may alleviate both time and financial barriers, increase PA, and result in greater weight loss. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clina, Julianne G., Pan, Zhaoxing, Wyatt, Holly R., Peters, John C., Hill, James O., Sayer, R. Drew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.618
_version_ 1784843980184223744
author Clina, Julianne G.
Pan, Zhaoxing
Wyatt, Holly R.
Peters, John C.
Hill, James O.
Sayer, R. Drew
author_facet Clina, Julianne G.
Pan, Zhaoxing
Wyatt, Holly R.
Peters, John C.
Hill, James O.
Sayer, R. Drew
author_sort Clina, Julianne G.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many barriers prevent individuals from regularly engaging in physical activity (PA), including lack of time and access to facilities. Providing free gym membership close to one's work may alleviate both time and financial barriers, increase PA, and result in greater weight loss. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine if gym usage, self‐reported leisure PA, and weight loss differed between participants working on the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (ON) versus working off‐campus (OFF) during a 6‐month weight loss trial. METHODS: 117 adults (ON, n = 62; OFF, n = 55) with overweight or obesity received free gym memberships for the duration of trial. Average gym check ins/week, self‐report leisure PA, weight, and fat and lean mass were compared between groups. RESULTS: ON reported more check‐ins than OFF (ON, 0.93 ± 0.16 times/week; OFF, 0.55 ± 0.10 times/week p = 0.038). Both groups reported increased leisure PA, with ON reporting more leisure PA than OFF at month 4. Both groups had reductions in weight and fat mass, which were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Gym usage in both groups was low, suggesting that convenient and free gym access only marginally promoted use of provided facilities, likely having little additional impact on PA and weight change. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The parent trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02627105.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9722460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97224602022-12-07 Secondary analysis of a university‐based weight loss program in on‐campus versus off‐campus employees Clina, Julianne G. Pan, Zhaoxing Wyatt, Holly R. Peters, John C. Hill, James O. Sayer, R. Drew Obes Sci Pract Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Many barriers prevent individuals from regularly engaging in physical activity (PA), including lack of time and access to facilities. Providing free gym membership close to one's work may alleviate both time and financial barriers, increase PA, and result in greater weight loss. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine if gym usage, self‐reported leisure PA, and weight loss differed between participants working on the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (ON) versus working off‐campus (OFF) during a 6‐month weight loss trial. METHODS: 117 adults (ON, n = 62; OFF, n = 55) with overweight or obesity received free gym memberships for the duration of trial. Average gym check ins/week, self‐report leisure PA, weight, and fat and lean mass were compared between groups. RESULTS: ON reported more check‐ins than OFF (ON, 0.93 ± 0.16 times/week; OFF, 0.55 ± 0.10 times/week p = 0.038). Both groups reported increased leisure PA, with ON reporting more leisure PA than OFF at month 4. Both groups had reductions in weight and fat mass, which were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Gym usage in both groups was low, suggesting that convenient and free gym access only marginally promoted use of provided facilities, likely having little additional impact on PA and weight change. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The parent trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02627105. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9722460/ /pubmed/36483127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.618 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Clina, Julianne G.
Pan, Zhaoxing
Wyatt, Holly R.
Peters, John C.
Hill, James O.
Sayer, R. Drew
Secondary analysis of a university‐based weight loss program in on‐campus versus off‐campus employees
title Secondary analysis of a university‐based weight loss program in on‐campus versus off‐campus employees
title_full Secondary analysis of a university‐based weight loss program in on‐campus versus off‐campus employees
title_fullStr Secondary analysis of a university‐based weight loss program in on‐campus versus off‐campus employees
title_full_unstemmed Secondary analysis of a university‐based weight loss program in on‐campus versus off‐campus employees
title_short Secondary analysis of a university‐based weight loss program in on‐campus versus off‐campus employees
title_sort secondary analysis of a university‐based weight loss program in on‐campus versus off‐campus employees
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.618
work_keys_str_mv AT clinajulianneg secondaryanalysisofauniversitybasedweightlossprograminoncampusversusoffcampusemployees
AT panzhaoxing secondaryanalysisofauniversitybasedweightlossprograminoncampusversusoffcampusemployees
AT wyatthollyr secondaryanalysisofauniversitybasedweightlossprograminoncampusversusoffcampusemployees
AT petersjohnc secondaryanalysisofauniversitybasedweightlossprograminoncampusversusoffcampusemployees
AT hilljameso secondaryanalysisofauniversitybasedweightlossprograminoncampusversusoffcampusemployees
AT sayerrdrew secondaryanalysisofauniversitybasedweightlossprograminoncampusversusoffcampusemployees